社会心理风险因素对工人行为安全影响机制研究

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.08.003

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (8): 18-24.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.08.003

• 安全社会科学与安全管理 • 上一篇下一篇

社会心理风险因素对工人行为安全影响机制研究

佟瑞鹏教授, 王露露, 杨校毅^**, 郭子萌, 安宇研究员

中国矿业大学(北京) 应急管理与安全工程学院,北京 100083

收稿日期:2020-05-09 修回日期:2020-07-10 出版日期:2020-08-28 发布日期:2021-07-15
通讯作者: ** 杨校毅 (1990—),男,河南洛阳人,博士研究生,研究方向为职业心理健康。E-mail: yangxyi6@126.com。
作者简介:佟瑞鹏 (1977—),男,黑龙江穆棱人,博士,教授,主要从事行为安全管理、职业心理健康、环境风险评估等方面的研究。E-mail: tongrp@cumtb.edu.cn。王露露 (1998—),女,山东菏泽人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为职业心理健康。E-mail: wanglulu1027@126.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助(51674268)。

Research on influence mechanism of PR on behavior based safety of workers

TONG Ruipeng, WANG Lulu, YANG Xiaoyi, GUO Zimeng, AN Yu

School of Emergency Management and Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology(Beijing), Beijing 100083, China

Received:2020-05-09 Revised:2020-07-10 Online:2020-08-28 Published:2021-07-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探究不同社会心理风险(PR)因素与工人行为安全间的相互作用关系,从个体和组织层面,选取8个典型的PR因素,提出路径关系假设并构建影响机制模型;以建筑行业为例,采用Meta分析检验假设并验证该模型的正确性。结果表明:PR通过影响工人的职业心理状态间接对行为安全产生积极和消极2方面的作用;工人的职业心理因素一般划分为工作倦怠和工作投入,个体层面的工作压力、角色冲突导致工作倦怠,削弱工作投入,角色模糊削弱工作投入,自主性促进工作投入,组织层面的社会支持削弱工作倦怠,促进工作投入,人际冲突导致工作倦怠,削弱工作投入;工作倦怠不利于工人的行为安全,工作投入能帮助工人维持安全行为。

关键词: 社会心理风险(PR), 行为安全, 工作倦怠, 工作投入, Meta分析

Abstract: In order to explore relationship between different PR and workers' behavior based safety, eight typical risk factors were selected from individual and organizational levels, path relationship hypotheses were proposed and an impact mechanism model was put forward. Then, these hypotheses were tested and the model was verified with construction industry as an example. The results show that PR exert positive and negative influence on workers' behavior based safety indirectly by affecting their occupational psychology which generally includes work burnout and work engagement. At individual level, work stress and role conflicts lead to work burnout, and weakens work engagement which is also weakened by role ambiguity but promoted by self motivation. At organizational level, social support reduces work burnout and enhances work engagement while interpersonal conflict does the opposite by causing work burnout and reducing work engagement. Work burnout goes against workers' behavior based safety while work engagement contributes to maintaining their safe behaviors.

Key words: psychosocial risk(PR), behavior based safety, work burnout, work engagement, Meta-analysis

中图分类号:

X911

佟瑞鹏, 王露露, 杨校毅, 郭子萌, 安宇. 社会心理风险因素对工人行为安全影响机制研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(8): 18-24.

TONG Ruipeng, WANG Lulu, YANG Xiaoyi, GUO Zimeng, AN Yu. Research on influence mechanism of PR on behavior based safety of workers[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(8): 18-24.

参考文献

[1] TOM C, AMANDA G. Commentary III: monitoring the changing organization of work: a commentary[J]. Sozial-und Pr Ventivmedizin, 2003, 48(6):354-355.
[2] PIKHART H, PIKHARTOVA J. The relationship between psychosocial risk factors and health outcomes of chronic diseases: a review of the evidence for cancer and cardiovascular diseases[M]. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2015: 156-162.
[3] 姜兰, 刘雅琴, 孙佳. 机场安检员工作压力与不安全行为关系研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(4): 13-18.
JIANG Lan, LIU Yaqin, SUN Jia. Research on relationship between work stress and unsafe behaviors of airport security staff[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019, 29(4): 13-18.
[4] 杨校毅, 佟瑞鹏. 基于Meta分析的矿工不安全行为JD-R模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(12): 71-76.
YANG Xiaoyi, TONG Ruipeng. Research on JD-R model of miners' unsafe behavior based on Meta-analysis[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2018, 28(12): 71-76.
[5] MICHELLE K T, NERINA L J, JANE E J. Role stressors in Australian transport and logistics workers: psychosocial implications[J]. Safety Science, 2018, 109: 12-19.
[6] MIRZA M Z, ISHA A S N, MEMON M A, et al. Psychosocial safety climate, safety compliance and safety participation: the mediating role of psychological distress[J]. Journal of Management & Organization, 2019,35: 1-16.
[7] SCHMIDT F L, HUNTER J E. Methods of Meta-analysis: correcting error and bias in research findings[J]. Evaluation & Program Planning, 2006, 29(3): 236-237.
[8] JOHNSON J V, HALL E M. Dialectic between conceptual and causal inquiry in psychosocial work-environment research[J]. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 1996, 1(4):362-374.
[9] BERNAL D, CAMPOS-SEMA J, TOBIAS A, et al. Work-related psychosocial risk factors and musculoskeletal disorders in hospital nurses and nursing aides: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 2015, 52(2): 635-648.
[10] 余善法.关注工作场所社会心理危险因素及其预防控制[J].环境与职业医学, 2020, 37(3): 218-224.
YU Shanfa. Focus on psychosocial hazards in the workplace and relevant prevention and control[J]. Journal of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, 2020, 37(3): 218-224.
[11] STAMATOGIANNI E, ANYFANTIS I D, DIMOPOULOS C, et al. Validating the accuracy of ESENER-II in assessing psychosocial risks for the case of micro firms in Cyprus[J]. Safety Science, 2019, 120: 783-797.
[12] LEUNG M Y, S. THOMAS N G, SKITMORE M, et al. Critical stressors influencing construction estimators in Hong Kong[J]. Construction Management & Economics, 2005, 23(1): 33-44.
[13] CARNES A M. Bringing work stress home: the impact of role conflict and role overload on spousal marital satisfaction[J]. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 2017, 90(2): 153-176.
[14] KAHN R L, WOLFE D M, QUINN R P, et al. Organizational stress: studies in role conflict and ambiguity[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1965, 10(1):DOI:10.2307/2091375.
[15] CHEN Yuting. Factors affecting safety performance of construction workers: safety climate, interpersonal conflicts at work, and resilience[D]. Toronto: University of Toronto, 2017.
[16] NAHRGANG J D, MORGESON F P, HOFMANN D A. Safety at work: a meta-analytic investigation of the link between job demands, job resources, burnout, engagement, and safety outcomes[J]. Journal of applied psychology, 2011, 96(1): 71-94.
[17] LEUNG M, ZHANG Hong, SKITMORE M. Effects of organizational supports on the stress of construction estimation participants[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2008, 134(2): 84-93.
[18] KALLIATH T, KALLIATH P, ALBRECHT S L. The influence of job, team and organizational level resources on employee well-being, engagement, commitment and extra-role performance[J]. International Journal of Manpower, 2012, 33(7): 840-853.
[19] SCHMIDT F L, HUNTER J E. Methods of meta-analysis: correcting error and bias in research findings[M]. California: Sage Publications, 2014: 3-32.

社会心理风险因素对工人行为安全影响机制研究

Research on influence mechanism of PR on behavior based safety of workers

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	贺琦, 张金锁, 王萍. 煤矿高层管理者工作压力与安全绩效关系研究^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(9): 29-35.
[2]	张鸿莹, 王袆, 孙宁昊. 基于Meta分析的高校教师职业压力失范行为JD-R模型^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(5): 174-180.
[3]	马跃, 刘严萍. 安全价值观契合对矿工安全行为的影响:一个链式中介模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(2): 9-15.
[4]	龙丹冰, 魏君豪, 杨成. 知识图谱改进的施工行为安全风险与危险位置识别算法^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(12): 10-16.
[5]	孙世梅, 高小迪, 孙赫, 傅贵. 天然气管道施工事故行为原因研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(6): 8-13.
[6]	安宇, 王袆, 李子琪, 张姜博南, 佟瑞鹏. 基于TPB的矿工不安全行为形成机制[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(10): 20-26.
[7]	黄浪, 吴超, 马剑. 行为流视域下的个体不安全行为分类及责任认定[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(9): 20-26.
[8]	孙世梅, 赵金坤, 傅贵. 基于“2-4”模型的高处坠落事故行为原因研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(8): 23-28.
[9]	牛莉霞, 刘勇, 李乃文. 辱虐型领导对员工工作偏离行为的影响:有链式中介调节模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(7): 12-19.
[10]	杨校毅, 佟瑞鹏. 基于Meta分析的矿工不安全行为JD-R模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(12): 71-76.
[11]	佟瑞鹏, 杨校毅. JD-R模型、理论在行为安全研究中的应用及述评[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(11): 42-47.
[12]	韩豫, 刘嘉伦, 张泾杰, 冯志达. 建筑工人危险认知结果的差异特性[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(9): 20-26.
[13]	佟瑞鹏, 崔鹏程. 基于深度学习的不安全因素识别和交互分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(4): 49-54.
[14]	傅贵，张苏，董继业，高上飞. 行为安全的理论实质与效果讨论[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2013, 23(3): 150-.
[15]	李乃文，牛莉霞，马跃. 高危岗位矿工工作倦怠影响因素的结构方程模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2012, 22(6): 27-.