中国安全科学学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (10): 112-118.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2021.10.016

• 公共安全 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于改进层次分析法的重点人员风险评价方法*

吴仁彪 教授, 何宇翔, 贾云飞 副教授   

  1. 中国民航大学 天津市智能信号与图像处理实验室,天津 300300
  • 收稿日期:2021-07-03 修回日期:2021-09-09 出版日期:2021-10-28 发布日期:2022-04-28
  • 作者简介:吴仁彪 (1966—),男,湖北武汉人,博士,教授,主要从事自适应信号处理,现代谱分析及其在雷达、卫星导航和空管中的应用等工作。E-mail:rbwu@vip.163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划项目(2018YFC0823701)。

Key personnel risk assessment method based on improved AHP

WU Renbiao, HE Yuxiang, JIA Yunfei   

  1. Tianjin Key Lab for Advanced Signal Processing, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China
  • Received:2021-07-03 Revised:2021-09-09 Online:2021-10-28 Published:2022-04-28

摘要: 为解决未来民航旅客安检分级缺乏科学定量评价的问题,利用层次分析法(AHP)构建评价体系,实现旅客背景分析和风险预警。针对传统AHP法通过人为经验方式选取评价指标具有较高主观性的缺点,提出一种改进的AHP法;通过恐怖主义数据库(JJATT)建立描述个人特征的样本数据集,采用随机森林(RF)筛选样本数据集特征,将最优的特征组合作为评价指标,建立人员风险评价体系;采用AHP法确定指标权重,结合评价指标打分表提出重点人员风险评估方法;应用评估方法评估大样本实例和真实个例的人员风险等级。研究结果表明:所提方法在多个样本数下的评估准确率均达92%以上,可评估验证样本的人员风险等级;经验证,作为所提方法核心的改进AHP法具备一定的合理性。

关键词: 层次分析法(AHP), 重点人员, 风险评价, 跨国恐怖主义数据库(JJATT), 随机森林(RF)

Abstract: In order to address the lack of scientific quantitative evaluation on passenger security screening classification of civil aviation in the future, an evaluation system was established by using AHP to realize passenger background analysis and risk warning. Considering the shortcoming of traditional AHP method, namely its high subjectivity as evaluation indicators were selected through artificial experience, an improved AHP was proposed. A sample database describing personal characteristics was created through JJATT, and RF was applied to screen characteristics of the database before a personnel risk evaluation system was developed with optimal combination of characteristics as evaluation indicators. Then, index weights were determined through AHP method, and a risk assessment method for key personnel was put forward based on evaluation index scoring table. Finally, the method was applied to evaluate risk levels of personnel in large sample cases and real cases. The results show that the evaluation accuracy rate of proposed method for multiple sample sizes is above 92%, and it can evaluate personnel risk level of samples. And improved AHP, as the core of the proposed method, is verified to have certain rationality.

Key words: analytic hierarchy process (AHP), key personnel, risk evaluation, John Jay & ARTIS transnational terrorism database (JJATT), random forest (RF)

中图分类号: