国内外建筑工程安全管理主要成就:基于安全事故、安全管理制度及相关文献的研究

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.10.1932

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为提高建筑工程安全管理水平,分析世界范围建筑工程安全事故特征,探究典型的国家制度安排,总结学术研究的成果和不足。结果表明:世界范围的建筑工程安全事故的整体趋势是从事故数量较多但致死率较低,转变为事故数量较少但致死率较高;我国事故数量和致死率呈现先上升后下降的趋势,并维持在较低水平。美国更关注制度底层(企业及市场)的安全管理,中国和越南更重视制度的顶层(律法与组织)设计,新加坡则对二者均有严格把控。学术研究在确定安全评价指标体系,探究事故发生和应对机制,测算安全管理投入,分析安全氛围作用机制等4个方面,取得丰硕成果。

关键词: 建筑工程安全管理, 安全事故, 安全管理制度, 国内外, 事故数量

Abstract:

In order to improve the safety management level of construction engineering, the characteristics of construction engineering safety accidents in the world were analyzed, the typical national institutional arrangements were explored, and the achievements and shortcomings of academic research were summarized. The results show that the overall trend of construction engineering safety accidents in the world changed from a large number of accidents with a low fatality rate to a small number of accidents with a high fatality rate, and the number of accidents and fatality rate in China increased first and then decreased, and remained at a low level. More attention has been paid to safety management at the bottom of the system (enterprise and market) in the United States, and design at the top of institutions (laws and organizations) has been more important in China and Vietnam, and both have been tightly controlled in Singapore. Fruitful results in four aspects have been achieved of literature research, safety evaluation indicators have been determined, safety accident occurrence and response mechanism have been explored, safety management investment has been calculated, and safety atmosphere measurement and mechanism have also been analyzed.

Key words: construction engineering safety management, safety accident, safety management system, domestic and overseas, number of accidents

郑文博. 国内外建筑工程安全管理主要成就:基于安全事故、安全管理制度及相关文献的研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(10): 8-17.

ZHENG Wenbo. Main achievements of construction engineering safety management: review of safety accidents, safety management system, and relevant literature[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(10): 8-17.

图/表 8

图1

图2

表1

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

参考文献 31

[1]	LI Heng, LU Miaojia, HSU S C, et al. Proactive behavior-based safety management for construction safety improvement[J]. Safety Science, 2015, 75:107-117. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.01.013
[2]	WILSON J M, KOEHN E. Safety management: problems encountered and recommended solutions[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering & Management, 2000, 126(1): 77-79.
[3]	叶贵, 付媛, 王玉合, 等. 行为视角下基于CiteSpace的建筑安全研究综述[J]. 安全与环境工程, 2019, 26(4):127-134.
	YE Gui, FU Yuan, WANG Yuhe, et al. Overview of construction safety research based on CiteSpace from a behavioral perspective[J]. Safety and Evironmental Engineering, 2019, 26(4):127-134.
[4]	王玉合, 叶贵, 汪红霞, 等. 人因视角下建筑安全研究现状及发展趋势分析[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2019, 15(8):58-63.
	WANG Yuhe, YE Gui, WANG Hongxia, et al. Analysis on status and development trend of construction safety research from perspective of human factors[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2019, 15(8):58-63.
[5]	ALRUQI W M, HALLOWELL M R, TECHERA U. Safety climate dimensions and their relationship to construction safety performance: a meta-analytic review[J]. Safety Science, 2018, 109:165-173. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2018.05.019
[6]	ZHANG R P, LINGARD H, OSWALD D. Impact of supervisory safety communication on safety climate and behavior in construction workgroups[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2020, 146(8):1-11.
[7]	孙龙龙, 王其宽, 施凯, 等. 基于知识图谱的建筑安全领域计算机视觉研究综述[J]. 安全与环境工程, 2021, 28(2):44-49.
	SUN Longlong, WANG Qikuan, SHI Kai, et al. Overview of computer vision research in construction safety field based on knowledge graph[J]. Safety and Evironmental Engineering, 2021, 28(2):44-49.
[8]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 中国建筑业年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国建筑业协会, 2009-2019.
[9]	The Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America. Occupational safety and health act[L]. Public Law 91-596, 1970.
[10]	卢锡雷, 陈细辉, 张晗辉, 等. 基于熵权-AHP的建筑工程施工安全评价研究[J]. 建筑经济, 2020, 41(增2):225-229.
	LU Xilei, CHEN Xihui, ZHANG Hanhui, et al. Research on construction safety evaluation of building engineering based on entropy weight-AHP[J]. Construction Economy, 2020, 41(S2):225-229.
[11]	李晓娟, 丰繁, 徐乐. 基于ACO算法的地铁工程施工安全风险评价[J]. 哈尔滨商业大学学报:自然科学版, 2019, 35(4):482-488.
	LI Xiaojuan, FENG Fan, XU Le. Security risk evaluation of subway construction based on ACO[J]. Journal of Harbin University of Commerce :Natural Sciences Edition, 2019, 35(4):482-488.
[12]	李书全, 窦艳杰. 基于RS-SVM模型的建筑安全事故预测模型[J]. 统计与决策, 2008(19):56-58.
[13]	张仕廉, 许海鸿. 建筑施工现场组织及员工安全行为评价[J]. 建筑经济, 2017, 38(1):53-57.
	ZHANG Shilian, XU Haihong. Research on organization and workers' safety behaviors evaluation for construction site[J]. Construction Economy, 2017, 38(1):53-57.
[14]	石硕, 王梦龙. 建筑工程项目施工阶段安全综合评价[J]. 建筑安全, 2018, 33(7):11-14.
[15]	KARAKHAN A, RAJENDRAN S, GAMBATESE J. Measuring and evaluating safety maturity of construction contractors: multicriteria decision-making approach[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2018, 44(7):1-13.
[16]	VERSTEEG K, BIGELOW P, DALE A M, et al. Utilizing construction safety leading and lagging indicators to measure project safety performance: a case study[J]. Safety Science, 2019, 120:411-421. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.06.035
[17]	MITROPOULOS P, ABDELHAMID T S, HOWELL G A. Systems model of construction accident causation[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2005, 131(7): 816-825. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:7(816)
[18]	叶贵, 李静, 段帅亮. 建筑工人不安全行为发生机理研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2016, 12(3):181-186.
	YE Gui, LI Jing, DUAN Shuailiang. Study on occurrence mechanism of unsafe behaviors for construction workers[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2016, 12(3):181-186.
[19]	CHEN Yuting, MCCABE B, HYATT D. A resilience safety climate model predicting construction safety performance[J]. Safety Science, 2018, 109:434-445. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2018.07.003
[20]	NEMETH C P, HERRERA I. Building change: resilience engineering sfter ten years[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2015, 141:1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2015.04.006
[21]	GUO Qingjun, AMIN S, HAO Qianwen, et al. Resilience assessment of safety system at subway construction sites applying analytic network process and extension cloud models[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2020, 201:1-14.
[22]	张仕廉, 赵隽. 建筑企业隐性安全成本分析及管理效率评价[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2014, 24(4):130-135.
	ZHANG Shilian, ZHAO Jun. Hidden safety costs analysis and management efficiency evaluation for construction enterprises[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2014, 24(4):130-135.
[23]	PELLICER E, CARVAJAL G I, RUBIO M C, et al. A method to estimate occupational health and safety costs in construction projects[J]. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2014, 18(7):1955-1965. doi: 10.1007/s12205-014-0591-2
[24]	陈伟, 周曼, 叶家军, 等. 建筑工程安全施工费费率测算的PSO-BP模型研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2016, 26(5):146-151.
	CHEN Wei, ZHOU Man, YE Jiajun, et al. PSO-BP modeling research on fee rate measurement of construction project safe construction cost[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2016, 26(5):146-151.
[25]	方东平, 黄新宇, 李晓东, 等. 建筑业安全事故经济损失研究[J]. 建筑经济, 2000, 121(3):13-16.
	FANG Dongping, HUANG Xinyu, LI Xiaodong, er al. Research on economic loss of construction safety accidents[J]. Construction Economy, 2000, 121(3):13-16.
[26]	LÓPEZ-ALONSO M, IBARRONDO-DÁVILA M P, RUBIO-GÁMEZ M C, et al. The impact of health and safety investment on construction company costs[J]. Safety Science, 2013, 60:151-159. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2013.06.013
[27]	叶贵, 任宏, 汪红霞. 基于模糊因子分析法的建筑企业安全成本因素分析[J]. 土木工程学报, 2011, 44(4):136-141.
	YE Gui, REN Hong, WANG Hongxia. A fuzzy factor analysis model for factors affecting the safety cost of construction enterprises[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2011, 44(4):136-141.
[28]	NAHANGI M, CHEN Yuting, MCCABE B. Safety-based efficiency evaluation of construction sites using data envelopment analysis (DEA)[J]. Safety Science, 2019, 113:382-388. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2018.12.005
[29]	FANG Dongping, CHEN Yang, WONG Louisa. Safety climate in construction industry: a case study in Hong Kong[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2006, 132(6):573-584. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2006)132:6(573)
[30]	董小刚, 王顺洪. 建筑企业安全文化对安全服从行为的影响:以过度自信的中介作用为视角[J]. 西南交通大学学报:社会科学版, 2015, 16(3):107-111.
	DONG Xiaogang, WANG Shunhong. Impact of safety culture on safety compliance behaviors in construction enterprises:from the perspective of mediating role of overconfidence[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University:Social Sciences, 2015, 16(3):107-111.
[31]	周彪, 吴春林, 汪涛, 等. 建设项目员工责任心对安全行为的影响[J]. 土木工程学报, 2018, 51(8):89-95.
	ZHOU Biao, WU Chunlin, WANG Tao, et al. The influence of conscientiousness to safety behavior in construction projects[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2018, 51(8):89-95.

分类	欧洲及大洋洲	亚洲	美洲	非洲
发达国家	葡萄牙 173;爱沙尼亚 138; 斯洛文尼亚 126;立陶宛 109; 冰岛 92;法国 91;意大利 91; 捷克 82;爱尔兰 80;奥地利 72; 希腊 61;匈牙利 58;波兰 57; 西班牙 51;卢森堡 49;比利时 43; 斯洛伐克40;瑞士 38;德国 38; 丹麦 36;澳大利亚;33; 拉脱维亚 33;瑞典 30;挪威 26; 英国 21;芬兰 19;荷兰 16(均值为61)	韩国 166^; 以色列 127^; 日本 66^; 新加坡 22^ (均值为95)	美国160^*	—
发展中国家	摩尔多瓦 447^;乌克兰 310^; 塞浦路斯 240^;保加利亚 136; 罗马尼亚 118;克罗地亚 116; 白俄罗斯 76^(均值为206)	斯里兰卡417^;土耳其 224; 泰国 182^;哈萨克斯坦144; 吉尔吉斯斯坦 144; 阿塞拜疆130^;蒙古国 129^; 马来西亚104;菲律宾 88; 越南 71;中国 17^; 巴勒斯坦 10^(均值为144)	巴拿马7^*; 哥伦比亚 0 (均值为4)	埃及 373; 塞舌尔 0^* (均值为187)