包容型领导对员工安全绩效的影响:一个有调节的链式中介模型

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.01.0362

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为探索包容型领导对员工安全绩效的影响机制和边界条件,提高员工安全绩效,引入自我效能感、工作幸福感和正念,构建一个有调节的链式中介模型;采用随机抽样法对辽宁、河北、山东等地600名高危企业员工进行问卷调查与数据分析,通过构建结构方程模型验证假设模型。结果表明: 包容型领导、自我效能感、工作幸福感和安全绩效两两之间显著正相关。包容型领导不仅直接影响员工的安全绩效,还可以通过自我效能感的独立中介作用、工作幸福感的独立中介作用以及自我效能感与工作幸福感的链式中介作用3条路径,间接影响员工安全绩效;正念正向调节工作幸福感与员工安全绩效之间的关系,并可进一步调节自我效能感和工作幸福感在包容型领导与员工安全绩效之间的链式中介作用。

关键词: 包容型领导, 安全绩效, 链式中介, 自我效能感, 工作幸福感, 正念

Abstract:

In order to explore the influence mechanism and boundary conditions of inclusive leadership on employees' safety performance so as to improve it, self-efficacy, job well-being and mindfulness were introduced to build a moderated chain mediation model. A questionnaire survey and data analysis were conducted on 600 employees of high-risk enterprises in Liaoning, Hebei, Shandong and other places by random sampling method, and the hypothesis model was verified by constructing a structural equation model. The results show that there is a significant positive correlation between every two factors of inclusive leadership, self-efficacy, job well-being and safety performance. Inclusive leadership not only directly affects employees' safety performance, but also indirectly affects employees' safety performance through the independent mediating role of self-efficacy, the independent mediating role of job well-being, and the chain mediating role of self-efficacy and job well-being. Mindfulness positively regulates the relationship between job well-being and employees'safety performance, and then further regulates the chain mediating effect of self-efficacy and job well-being on the relationship between inclusive leadership and employees' safety performance.

Key words: inclusive leadership, safety performance, chain mediation, self-efficacy, job well-being, mindfulness

王丹, 董冉. 包容型领导对员工安全绩效的影响:一个有调节的链式中介模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(1): 18-23.

WANG Dan, DONG Ran. Influence of inclusive leadership on employees' safety performance: a moderated chain mediation model[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(1): 18-23.

图/表 5

图1

表1

图2

图3

表2

参考文献 23

[1]	国家统计局. 中华人民共和国2021年国民经济和社会发展统计公报[N]. 中国信息报,2022-03-01(1).
[2]	丁天维, 沈玉志. 基于优势的心理氛围对员工安全绩效的影响机制[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(8):38-46. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2021.08.006
	DING Tianwei, SHEN Yuzhi. Impact mechanism of strengths-based psychological climate on employees' safety performance[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(8):38-46. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2021.08.006
[3]	STAW B M, SUTTON R I, PELLED L H. Employee positive emotion and favorable outcomes at the workplace[J]. Organization Science, 1994, 5(1): 51-71. doi: 10.1287/orsc.5.1.51
[4]	薛丁铭, 唐娅婷, 李永鑫. 包容型领导与中学教师的工作绩效:效能感的中介作用[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2019, 7(7):396-402,408.
	XUE Dingming, TANG Yating, LI Yongxin. The inclusive leadership and teachers' job performance in secondary school:the mediating of efficacy[J]. Psychology:Techniques and Applications, 2019, 7(7):396-402,408.
[5]	HANTULA D A. The essential leader-follower relationship[J]. The Psychological Record, 2009, 59(4): 701-704. doi: 10.1007/BF03395688
[6]	IVERS N N, JOHNSON D A, CLARKE P B, et al. The relationship between mindfulness and multicultural counseling competence[J]. Journal of Counseling & Development, 2016, 94(1): 72-82. doi: 10.1002/jcad.12063
[7]	NEMBHARD I M, EDMONDSON A C. Making it safe: the effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2006, 27(7): 941-966. doi: 10.1002/job.413
[8]	WU Joshua B, HOM P W, TETRICK L E, et al. The norm of reciprocity: scale development and validation in the chinese context[J]. Management and Organization Review, 2006, 2(3): 377-402. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8784.2006.00047.x
[9]	辛杰, 刘淑君, 孙卫敏. 谦卑型领导影响员工建言行为机制研究[J]. 中央财经大学学报, 2021(1):109-118.
	XIN Jie, LIU Shujun, SUN Weimin. Study on the mechanism of how humble leadership style can influence employee input behaviors[J]. Journal of Central University of Finance & Economics, 2021(1):109-118.
[10]	方阳春. 包容型领导风格对团队绩效的影响:基于员工自我效能感的中介作用[J]. 科研管理, 2014, 35(5):152-160.
	FANG Yangchun. The effect of inclusive leadership on team performance: based on the mediating effect of self-efficacy[J]. Science Research Management, 2014, 35(5):152-160.
[11]	王德胜, 韩杰, 李婷婷. 真实型领导如何抑制员工反生产行为? 领导-成员交换的中介作用与自我效能感的调节作用[J]. 经济与管理研究, 2020, 41(7):134-144.
	WANG Desheng, HAN Jie, LI Tingting. How does the authentic leadership restrain the employees' CWB? mediated by leader-member exchange and moderated by self-efficacy[J]. Research on Economics and Management, 2020, 41(7):134-144.
[12]	冯亚娟, 邢仲超. 破坏性领导对安全绩效影响的条件过程分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(8):14-21. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2021.08.003
	FENG Yajuan, XING Zhongchao. Research on impacts of destructive leadership on safety performance based on conditional process analysis[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(8) : 14-21. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2021.08.003
[13]	RYFF C D, KEYES C L M. The structure of psychological well-being revisited[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1995, 69(4): 719. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.69.4.719 pmid: 7473027
[14]	张征, 古银华. 包容型领导对下属工作幸福感的影响研究:互动公平与传统性的作用[J]. 软科学, 2017, 31(7):84-88.
	ZHANG Zheng, GU Yinhua. The influence research of inclusive leadership on subordinates' work well- being: the role of interactional justice and traditionality[J]. Soft Science, 2017, 31(7):84-88.
[15]	ADNAN B K. Impact of work-life balance, happiness at work, on employee performance[J]. International Business Research, 2019, 12(2): 99-112.
[16]	SIU Oiling, LU Changqin, SPECTOR P E. Employees'well-being in greater china: the direct and moderating effects of general self-efficacy[J]. Applied Psychology, 2007, 56(2): 288-301. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2006.00255.x
[17]	陈建安, 陈明艳, 金晶. 支持性人力资源管理与员工工作幸福感:基于中介机制的实证研究[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2018, 40(1):79-92.
	CHEN Jian'an, CHEN Mingyan, JIN Jing. supportive human resource management and employee work-related well-being: an empirical study based on mediating mechanism[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2018, 40(1):79-92.
[18]	牛莉霞, 刘勇, 李乃文. 正念对安全绩效影响的链式中介机制分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(6):14-22. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.06.003
	NIU Lixia, LIU Yong, LI Naiwen. Analysis on chain intermediary mechanism of mindfulness's influence on safety performance[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(6): 14-22. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.06.003
[19]	CARMELI A, REITER-PALMON R, ZIV E. Inclusive leadership and employee involvement in creative tasks in the workplace: the mediating role of psychological safety[J]. Creativity Research Journal, 2010, 22(3): 250-260. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2010.504654
[20]	PARKER S K. That is my job' how employees' role orientation affects their job performance[J]. Human Relations, 2007, 60(3): 403-434. doi: 10.1177/0018726707076684
[21]	ZHENG Xiaoming, ZHU Weichun, ZHAO Haixia, et al. Employee well-being in organizations: theoretical model, scale development, and cross-cultural validation[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2015, 36(5): 621-644. doi: 10.1002/job.1990
[22]	刘素霞. 基于安全生产绩效提升的中小企业安全生产行为研究[D]. 镇江: 江苏大学, 2012.
	LIU Suxia. Study on SMEs' production safety behavior for improving safety performance[D]. Zhenjiang: Jiangsu University, 2012-848.
[23]	BROWN K W, RYAN R M. The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2003, 84(4): 822-848. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822 pmid: 12703651

变量	1	2	3	4
包容型领导	1	—	—	—
自我效能感	0.45^**	1	—	—
工作幸福感	0.36^**	0.56^**	1	—
安全绩效	0.52^**	0.29^**	0.44^**	1
均值	2.63	2.47	3.05	2.81
标准差	0.86	0.93	0.74	0.97

调节变量	间接效应值	Boot 标准误	95%置信区间
调节变量	间接效应值	Boot 标准误	下限	上限
低正念	0.165	0.071	0.022	0.194
高正念	0.235	0.058	0.092	0.328