China Safety Science Journal ›› 2022, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (11): 200-207.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.11.1392
• Emergency technology and management • Previous Articles Next Articles
GAO Pengfei1(), LIU Fangxiang2, HUANG Jianhua2, WANG Yang1
Received:
2022-05-05
Revised:
2022-09-02
Online:
2022-11-28
Published:
2023-05-28
GAO Pengfei, LIU Fangxiang, HUANG Jianhua, WANG Yang. Research on post-earthquake emergency material allocation considering psychological pain of victims[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(11): 200-207.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.cssjj.com.cn/EN/10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.11.1392
Tab.2
Alternative emergency material distribution center transfer capability
备选物资 配送中心 | 所属 灾区 | 转运 量/t | 备选物资 配送中心 | 所属 灾区 | 转运 量/t | 备选物资 配送中心 | 所属 灾区 | 转运 量/t |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S1都江堰 | R1 | 700 | S7大邑 | R1 | 500 | S13绵阳 | R2 | 2 820 |
S2茂县 | R1 | 1 650 | S8什邡 | R2 | 2700 | S14广汉 | R2 | 2 750 |
S3彭州 | R1 | 700 | S9北川 | R2 | 6000 | S15广元 | R3 | 1 350 |
S4汶川 | R1 | 1 600 | S10平武 | R2 | 2750 | S16青川 | R3 | 1 380 |
S5九寨沟 | R1 | 2 200 | S11江油 | R2 | 2800 | S17旺苍 | R3 | 1 400 |
S6崇州 | R1 | 600 | S12德阳 | R2 | 2760 | S18剑阁 | R3 | 1 450 |
Tab.3
Material requirements at disaster sites
受灾点 | 灾区 | 食品/ 份 | 生活用 品/份 | 受灾点 | 灾区 | 食品/ 份 | 生活用 品/份 | 受灾点 | 灾区 | 食品/ 份 | 生活用 品/份 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J1都江堰 | R1 | 280 000 | 28 000 | J20三江 | R1 | 30 800 | 3 080 | J39开坪 | R2 | 38 000 | 3 800 |
J2灌口镇 | R1 | 53 000 | 5 300 | J21小金 | R1 | 25 000 | 3 400 | J40罗江县 | R2 | 87 000 | 8 470 |
J3青城山 | R1 | 48 600 | 4 860 | J22黑水 | R1 | 62 000 | 6 200 | J41中江县 | R2 | 106 000 | 9 600 |
J4紫平铺 | R1 | 44 000 | 4 400 | J23松潘 | R1 | 24 000 | 2 300 | J42三台县 | R2 | 137 000 | 13 700 |
J5虹口乡 | R1 | 48 000 | 4 800 | J24安县 | R2 | 239 500 | 23 950 | J43盐亭县 | R2 | 137 500 | 13 750 |
J6茂县 | R1 | 216 500 | 21 650 | J25秀水 | R2 | 35 600 | 3 560 | J44梓潼县 | R2 | 156 500 | 15 650 |
J7富顺 | R1 | 36 000 | 3 600 | J26宝林 | R2 | 42 000 | 4 200 | J45德阳 | R2 | 217 200 | 21 720 |
J8飞虹 | R1 | 38 000 | 3 800 | J27高川 | R2 | 22 800 | 2 280 | J46绵阳 | R2 | 230 000 | 23 000 |
J9黑虎 | R1 | 40 000 | 4 000 | J28什邡 | R2 | 240 000 | 24 000 | J47广元 | R3 | 93 800 | 9 380 |
J10太平 | R1 | 32 000 | 3 200 | J29洛水 | R2 | 38 000 | 3 800 | J48青川 | R3 | 270 500 | 27 050 |
J11理县 | R1 | 214 000 | 21 400 | J30双盛镇 | R2 | 52 000 | 5 200 | J49瓦砾乡 | R3 | 41 200 | 4 120 |
J12朴头 | R1 | 32 000 | 3 200 | J31蓥华镇 | R2 | 48 000 | 4 800 | J50板桥乡 | R3 | 48 800 | 4 880 |
13木卡乡 | R1 | 20 000 | 2 000 | J32绵竹 | R2 | 290 500 | 29 050 | J51骑马乡 | R3 | 45 000 | 4 500 |
14通化乡 | R1 | 48 000 | 4 800 | J33剑南 | R2 | 35 200 | 3 520 | J52营盘乡 | R3 | 41 000 | 4 100 |
J15汶川 | R1 | 308 500 | 30 850 | J34绵远镇 | R2 | 31 200 | 3 120 | J53利州区 | R3 | 89 000 | 8 900 |
J16映秀 | R1 | 40 000 | 4 000 | J35汉王镇 | R2 | 27 200 | 2 720 | J54朝天区 | R3 | 83 000 | 8 020 |
J17水磨 | R1 | 36 000 | 3 600 | J36北川 | R2 | 303 500 | 30 350 | J55苍溪 | R3 | 156 500 | 15 650 |
J18卧龙 | R1 | 34 000 | 3 400 | J37永安 | R2 | 38 800 | 3 880 | J56剑阁 | R3 | 77 500 | 7 750 |
J19雁门 | R1 | 34 800 | 3 480 | J38永昌 | R2 | 42 000 | 4 200 | J57元坝区 | R3 | 89 000 | 8 900 |
Tab.4
Comparison of objective function values under different distribution center opening schemes
配送中 心数量 | 所选配送中心 | 平均痛苦 成本Z1/元 | 物流成 本Z2/元 |
---|---|---|---|
5 | S1,S4,S9,S12,S18 | 38 906 000 | 111 510 |
6 | S1,S4,S9, S12,S15,S16 | 38 744 000 | 111 560 |
7 | S1,S4,S9,S12, S13,S15,S16 | 38 732 000 | 112 420 |
8 | S1,S4,S8,S9,S12, S13,S15,S18 | 38 308 000 | 114 480 |
9 | S1,S4,S8,S9,S12, S13,S15,S16,S18 | 38 271 000 | 114 570 |
Tab.5
Material distribution scheme from material distribution point to emergency material distribution center
集散点 | 服务配送中心 | 食品/份 | 运输方式 | 集散点 | 服务配送中心 | 生活用品/份 | 运输方式 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I1 | S1 | 385 684 | H | I1 | S1 | 44 623 | H |
S9 | 324 975 | H | S9 | 18 999 | H | ||
S12 | 89 838 | H | S12 | 17 902 | H | ||
I2 | S12 | 225 813 | H | I2 | S8 | 32 884 | H |
S13 | 794 227 | H | S13 | 46 435 | H | ||
S16 | 282 190 | H | S15 | 16 999 | H | ||
S18 | 98 775 | H | S16 | 21 563 | H | ||
I3 | S4 | 964 286 | R | S18 | 11 301 | H | |
S8 | 562 450 | H | I2 | S4 | 109 498 | R | |
S15 | 224 238 | H | |||||
S18 | 49 125 | H |
Tab.6
Material transportation scheme fromemergency material distribution center to the disaster site
配送 中心 | 受灾 点 | 分配 车辆数 | 物资调配量/份 | 物资到达时刻/h | 配送 中心 | 受灾点 | 分配 车辆 数 | 物资调配量/份 | 物资到达时刻/h | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
食品 | 生活 用品 | 食品 | 生活 用品 | 食品 | 生活 用品 | 食品 | 生活 用品 | ||||||
S1 | J1 | 9 | 216 590 | 24 615 | 2 | 2 | S9 | J36 | 7 | 233 554 | 13 655 | 26.5 | 26.5 |
J2 | 2 | 40 998 | 4 660 | 2.4 | 2.4 | J37 | 2 | 29 858 | 1 745 | 25.66 | 25.66 | ||
J3 | 2 | 37 594 | 4 273 | 2.88 | 2.88 | J38 | 2 | 32 321 | 1 890 | 26.44 | 26.44 | ||
J4 | 2 | 34 036 | 3 868 | 3.2 | 3.2 | J39 | 2 | 29 243 | 1 710 | 27.04 | 27.04 | ||
J5 | 2 | 37 130 | 4 220 | 3.76 | 3.76 | S12 | J40 | 3 | 66 940 | 3 811 | 3.6 | 3.6 | |
J21 | 2 | 19 339 | 2 989 | 15 | 15 | J41 | 3 | 81 571 | 4 320 | 4.98 | 4.98 | ||
S4 | J6 | 6 | 167 470 | 19 033 | 6.76 | 6.76 | J45 | 5 | 167 143 | 9 772 | 2.44 | 2.44 | |
J7 | 2 | 27 848 | 3 165 | 16.76 | 16.76 | S13 | J24 | 6 | 184 304 | 10 776 | 4.64 | 4.64 | |
J8 | 2 | 29 395 | 3 341 | 8.7 | 8.7 | J25 | 2 | 27 396 | 1 602 | 5.34 | 5.34 | ||
J9 | 2 | 30 942 | 3 517 | 9.16 | 9.16 | J26 | 2 | 32 321 | 1 890 | 5.06 | 5.06 | ||
J10 | 2 | 24 754 | 2 814 | 8.94 | 8.94 | J27 | 2 | 17 536 | 1 026 | 7.04 | 7.04 | ||
J11 | 6 | 165 537 | 18 813 | 9.8 | 9.8 | J34 | 2 | 24 010 | 1 404 | 5.7 | 5.7 | ||
J12 | 2 | 24 754 | 2 814 | 10 | 10 | J42 | 3 | 105 427 | 6 164 | 6.4 | 6.4 | ||
J13 | 2 | 15 471 | 1 759 | 8 | 8 | J43 | 3 | 105 811 | 6 187 | 8.56 | 8.56 | ||
J14 | 2 | 37 130 | 4 220 | 8.2 | 8.2 | J44 | 4 | 120 433 | 7 042 | 7 | 7 | ||
J15 | 9 | 238 635 | 27 120 | 3.5 | 3.5 | J46 | 6 | 176 993 | 10 348 | 3.8 | 3.8 | ||
J16 | 2 | 30 942 | 3 517 | 8.8 | 8.8 | S15 | J47 | 3 | 59 284 | 4 530 | 8.16 | 8.86 | |
J17 | 2 | 27 848 | 3 165 | 9.9 | 9.9 | J53 | 2 | 56 250 | 4 298 | 8.26 | 8.96 | ||
J18 | 2 | 26 301 | 2 989 | 10.1 | 10.1 | J54 | 2 | 52 458 | 3 873 | 10.46 | 11.16 | ||
J19 | 2 | 26 919 | 3 058 | 3.9 | 3.9 | J57 | 2 | 56 250 | 4 298 | 9.62 | 10.32 | ||
J20 | 2 | 23 825 | 2 708 | 10.7 | 10.7 | S16 | J48 | 6 | 170 962 | 13 063 | 12.8 | 12.8 | |
J22 | 2 | 47 960 | 5 451 | 15.8 | 15.8 | J49 | 2 | 26 040 | 1 990 | 13.9 | 13.9 | ||
J23 | 2 | 18 565 | 2 022 | 15.5 | 15.5 | J50 | 2 | 30 843 | 2 357 | 13.7 | 13.7 | ||
S8 | J28 | 6 | 184 689 | 10 798 | 2.14 | 2.84 | J51 | 2 | 28 441 | 2 174 | 14.06 | 14.06 | |
J29 | 2 | 29 243 | 1 710 | 3.18 | 3.88 | J52 | 2 | 25 906 | 1 980 | 14.8 | 14.8 | ||
J30 | 2 | 40 016 | 2 340 | 2.74 | 3.44 | S18 | J55 | 3 | 98 912 | 7 558 | 11.92 | 11.92 | |
J31 | 2 | 36 938 | 2 160 | 3.64 | 4.34 | J56 | 2 | 48 982 | 3 743 | 8.56 | 8.56 | ||
J32 | 6 | 223 550 | 13 070 | 3.4 | 4.1 | ||||||||
J33 | 2 | 27 088 | 1 584 | 3.6 | 4.3 | ||||||||
J35 | 2 | 20 932 | 1 224 | 3.9 | 4.6 |
[1] |
吕伟, 李志红, 冯满满, 等. 考虑资源和时间窗约束的应急物资调配模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(12):137-143.
doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2019.12.022 |
doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2019.12.022 |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
张聆晔, 吕靖, 梁孝, 等. 考虑多事故点的海上重大事故应急物资优化调度[J]. 系统工程, 2021, 39(4):103-114.
|
|
|
[4] |
doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.069 |
[5] |
doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.102 |
[6] |
曲冲冲, 王晶, 黄钧, 等. 考虑时效与公平性的震后应急物资动态配送优化研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(6): 178-187.
|
|
|
[7] |
宋英华, 苏贝贝, 霍非舟, 等. 考虑动态需求的应急物资配送中心快速选址研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(8):172-177.
doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2019.08.027 |
|
|
[8] |
doi: 10.1007/s10479-015-2097-9 |
[9] |
郑斌, 马祖军, 周愉峰. 震后应急物流动态选址-联运问题的双层规划模型[J]. 系统管理学报, 2017, 26(2):326-337.
|
|
|
[10] |
林勇, 肖骅, 张立, 等. 震灾应急物资分配-运输优化模型及算法研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(10):171-178.
doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2020.10.024 |
doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2020.10.024 |
|
[11] |
doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2013.06.002 |
[12] |
doi: 10.1287/trsc.2014.0565 |
[13] |
陈刚, 付江月. 兼顾公平与效率的多目标应急物资分配问题研究[J]. 管理学报, 2018, 15(3):459-466.
|
|
|
[14] |
宋英华, 葛艳, 杜丽敬, 等. 考虑灾民心理的应急设施选址配送问题研究[J]. 灾害学, 2019, 34(1):187-193.
|
|
|
[15] |
朱莉, 曹杰, 顾珺, 等. 公平缓解灾民创伤下的应急物资动态调配研究[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2020, 40(9):2427-2437.
doi: 10.12011/1000-6788-2019-0805-11 |
|
[1] | SONG Yinghua, HAN Baoshuai, GUO Chen. Location selection model of emergency shelter considering risk of flood disaster in county [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(4): 191-198. |
[2] | MA Tianming, HUANG Chuyuan, CHEN Xianfeng. Heterogeneous vehicle routing problem of hazardous materials transportation considering carbon emissions [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(1): 193-199. |
[3] | LIN Qing, YAO Junming, LIANG Wei, YANG Fang, LIAO Chunyan, WANG Youchun. Residual life prediction of gas generator set based on deep learning [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(9): 113-121. |
[4] | CHAI Huo, HE Ruichun, JIA Xiaoyan, DAI Cunjie. Vehicle scheduling for hazardous materials transportation based on dissimilar paths [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(9): 181-188. |
[5] | CHEN Wei, TIAN Yishuai, ZENG Weihua, GUO Daoyuan, ZHAO Zhuoya. HC-GC human factors analysis model for construction engineering safety accidents caused by heavy rainfall [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(8): 15-23. |
[6] | CHEN Huaqun, YANG Weichao. Hierarchy location optimization of low-altitude flight service station based on risk constraints [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(5): 57-65. |
[7] | XIA Chenhong, ZHAI Guofang. RAGA-PP model for comprehensive disaster-bearing capacity evaluation of urban agglomerations [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(4): 187-193. |
[8] | JIANG Xiaoyi, HE Ketai, JING Haosheng. Warehouse site selection of emergency epidemic prevention materials based on metapopulation SIR model [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(4): 194-201. |
[9] | QIE Yanhui, GUO Tao, ZHOU Lingzhi, WANG Yu. Prediction of burst pressure of 20 steel elbow with defects based on SVM [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(2): 89-95. |
[10] | ZHANG Minbo, ZHONG Ziyi, YAN Jin, WANG Cuiling, WANG Zichao, LI Chunxin. Model of emergency supplies allocation in epidemic areas considering spread of biohazard diffusion [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(11): 206-213. |
[11] | WU Xianguo, FENG Zongbao, LIU Jun, WANG Lei, CHEN Hongyu, LI Xinyi. Multi-objective optimization of surface settlement safety control during shield construction based on RF-NSGA-II [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(8): 45-51. |
[12] | LI Shanmei, XU Wei. Flight rerouting planning considering travel time reliability [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(8): 98-103. |
[13] | SONG Yinghua, BAI Mingxuan, MA Yaping, LYU Wei, HUO Feizhou. Optimal model for fair dispatch of emergency materials considering regional disaster classification [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(1): 172-179. |
[14] | BAI Peng, CHEN Linfeng, WANG Xi, GONG Yu, JIANG Songrong, ZHOU Qiongqi. Research on arrival procedure optimization and aircraft sequencing based on point merging [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(12): 45-52. |
[15] | ZOU Rongwei, YANG Qiliang, XING Jianchun, LI Suliang, CHEN Wenjie, KONG Linlin. False alarm judgment method based on dynamic and static mixed data analysis: for building BIM operation and maintenance platforms [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(11): 163-170. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||