Game decision model of emergency reserve management of flood control materials

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.05.2184

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to improve the use efficiency of government funds for flood control emergency supplies, combined with the actual flow of flood control supplies reserve and transportation, this paper studies the government-enterprise joint reserve of flood control supplies model of outsourcing or autonomy. Under the condition that the total government and enterprise reserves were fixed, the one-time government subsidy and the proportion of the contracted enterprise's material reserve were taken as decision variables. Respectively, considering the whole supply chain profit optimal, the optimal government cost and supply chain coordination as three objectives, the three flood control and emergency supplies reserves based on option contract models were designed. By deducing the optimal material reserve ratio and the corresponding one-time government subsidy amount under the conditions of different parameters of each model, taking Jiangsu Province as an example, three kinds of flood control materials, namely wood cube, woven bag and block stone, were selected for empirical analysis. The results show that the supply chain coordination model can improve the overall profit of the supply chain effectively, and ensure the optimal government reserve cost and the optimal profit of the contract enterprise to a certain extent. The production cost of entrusted enterprises to reserve materials and the holding cost of government reserve materials have a great impact on the proportion of material reserves.

Key words: flood control supplies, emergency reserve, reserve management, game, decision model, reserve mode, option contract, supply chain coordination

WANG Wei, SONG Yue, CHEN Zhisong, HUANG Li, SHI Yuxin. Game decision model of emergency reserve management of flood control materials[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(5): 191-198.

Figures/Tables 7

Fig.1

Tab.1

Ratio of material reserves in case of the largest profit in supply chain

初始条件	$h v - h g > 0$		$h v - h g < 0$
补充条件	$c v - c g h g - h v > (1 - ρ) + ρ q ∫ 0 q F (x) d x$	$c v - c g h g - h v < (1 - ρ) + ρ q ∫ 0 q F (x) d x$	$c v - c g h g - h v < 1 - ρ$	$c v - c g h g - h v > 1 - ρ + ρ F (q)$	$1 - ρ < c v - c g h g - h v < 1 - ρ + ρ F (q)$
α^* 取值	$α = 1$	$α = 0$	$α = 1$	$α = 0$	$α * = 1 - F - 1 1 + c v - c g (h g - h v) ρ - 1 ρ q$

Tab.1

Tab.2

Proportion of material reserves at lowest cost of government reserves

条件	$α * *$ 取值
$w o < c g + h g - v - ρ (h g + w - v)$	1
$w o > c g + h g - v - ρ (h g - ν + w) {1 - F (q)}$	0
$w o < c g + h g - v - ρ (h g - ν + w) {1 - F (q)} 且 w o > c g + h g - v - ρ (h g + w - v)$	$1 - 1 q F - 1 1 - c g + h g - v - w o ρ (h g - ν + w)$

Tab.2

Tab.3

Ratio of lump-sum subsidy and optimal reserve in case of supply chain coordination

序号	储备模式	参数条件	一次性补贴金额 $w o$	最优储备比例 $α *$
①	混合储备	$1 - ρ < c v - c g h g - h v < 1 - ρ + ρ F (q) 且 h v - h g < 0$	$w o = c g - w + (h g - ν + w) (c v - c g) h g - h v$ 且 $c g + h g - v - ρ (h g + w - v) < w o < c g + h g - v - ρ [1 - F (q)] (h g + w - v)$	$1 - 1 q F - 1 1 + c v - c g (h g - h v) ρ - 1 ρ$
②	协议企业代储	$c v - c g h g - h v > 1 - ρ + ρ q ∫ 0 q F (x) d x 且 h v - h g > 0$	$w o < c g + h g - v - ρ (h g + w - v)$	1
②	协议企业代储	$c v - c g h g - h v < 1 - ρ 且 h v - h g < 0$	$w o < c g + h g - v - ρ (h g + w - v)$	1
③	政府直储	$c v - c g h g - h v < (1 - ρ) + ρ q ∫ 0 q F (x) d x 且 h v - h g > 0$	$w o > c g + h g - v - ρ [1 - F (q)] (h g + w - v)$	0
③	政府直储	$c v - c g h g - h v > 1 - ρ + ρ F (q) 且 h v - h g < 0$	$w o > c g + h g - v - ρ [1 - F (q)] (h g + w - v)$	0

Tab.3

Tab.4

Total supply chain profit, total government cost and profits of agreed enterprise in case of supply chain coordination

序号	供应链总利润	政府总成本	协议企业总利润
①	$E Π s c = χ [c v - c g + (1 - ρ) (h v - h g)] + q [(1 - ρ) (v - h v) - c v] + ρ s q - s U + s ∫ q U F (x) d x + (v - h g) ∫ 0 χ F (x) d x + (v - h v) ∫ χ q F (x) d x$	$E Π g = c g - w + (h g - ν + w) (c v - c g) h g - h v q + (1 - ρ) (h g - v) + w - (h g - ν + w) (c v - c g) h g - h v χ + ρ w α q - s q + s U + (h g - ν) ∫ 0 χ F (x) d x - w ∫ χ q F (x) d x - s ∫ q U F (x) d x$	$E Π s = (1 - ρ) (h v - v) + w - (c v - c g) (h g - ν + w) h g - h v χ + (1 - ρ) (v - h v) - c v + c g - w + (h g - ν + w) (c v - c g) h g - h v q + ρ [(v - h v - w) ∫ χ q F (x) d x + w α q]$
②	$E Π s c = - c v q + (1 - ρ) (v - h v) q + ρ s q - s U + s ∫ q U F (x) d x + (v - h v) ∫ 0 q F (x) d x$	$E Π g = w o q + ρ w q - s q + s U - w ∫ 0 q F (x) d x - s ∫ q U F (x) d x$	$E Π s = q [w o - c v + (1 - ρ) (v - h v)] + ρ {w q + (v - h v - w) ∫ 0 q F (x) d x}$
③	$E Π s c = - c g q + (1 - ρ) (v - h g) q + ρ s q - s U + s ∫ q U F (x) d x + (v - h g) ∫ 0 q F (x) d x$	$E Π g = c g q + (1 - ρ) (h g - v) q + ρ - s q + s U - s ∫ q U F (x) d x + (h g - ν) ∫ 0 q F (x) d x$	$E Π s = 0$

Tab.4

Tab.5

Parameter value

参数符号	参数取值
参数符号	木方		编织袋	块石
q	600		4 600 000	180 000
$ρ$	0.539		0.506	0.493
w	3 906		1.165	29.98
$c g$	2 413		1.675	16.36
$h g$	5 258	0.837		61.43
$c v$	3 565	1.240		74.77
$h v$	3 181	0.433		44.09
$ν$	463	0.050		4.52
s	4 826	3.35		32.73

Tab.5

Tab.6

References 14

[1]	戢晓峰, 杨春丽, 郝京京, 等. 国内外应急物流研究热点对比与展望[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(12):144-152. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2021.12.019
	JI Xiaofeng, YANG Chunli, HAO Jingjing, et al. Research prospects and hotspot comparison for emergency logistics in China and foreign countries[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(12):144-152. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2021.12.019
[2]	陈长坤, 赵冬月. 社会经济视角下新冠肺炎疫情危机推演与防控分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(12):24-29. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2020.12.004
	CHEN Changkun, ZHAO Dongyue. Analysis of crisis deduction and prevention and control during COVID-19 pandemic from asocio-economic perspective[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(12):24-29. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2020.12.004
[3]	ZHANG Yongling, CHEN Lu. Emergency materials reserve of government for natural disasters[J]. Natural Hazards, 2016, 81(1):1-14.
[4]	罗静, 李从东. 基于演化博弈的应急物资生产能力储备策略[J]. 工业工程, 2015, 18(2):15-19.
	LUO Jing, LI Congdong. Capacity Reserve strategy of emergency materials based on evolutionary game[J]. Industrial Engineering Journal, 2015, 18(2):15-19.
[5]	艾云飞, 吕靖, 王军, 等. 应急物资政企联合储备合作机理研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2015, 24(5):126-131. doi: 10.12005/orms.2015.0168
	AI Yunfei, LYU Jing, WANG Jun, et al. The study of cooperation mechanism between government and enterprises in emergency supplies reserve[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2015, 24(5):126-131. doi: 10.12005/orms.2015.0168
[6]	MAHMOUDI R, RASTI-BARZOKI M. Sustainable supply chains under government intervention with a real-world case study: an evolutionary game theoretic approach[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2018, 116(2):130-143. doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2017.12.028
[7]	雷洋, 黄承锋. 基于演化博弈的非耐用型应急物资储备策略分析[J]. 财会月刊, 2017, 21(17):104-108.
	LEI Yang, HUANG Chengfeng. Analysis of non-durable emergency material reserve strategy based on evolutionary game[J]. Finance and Accounting Monthly, 2017, 21(17):104-108.
[8]	张琳, 田军, 党创寅, 等. 企业应急物资轮换更新行为与政府监管博弈分析[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2018, 38(10):2611-2619. doi: 10.12011/1000-6788(2018)10-2611-09
	ZHANG Lin, TIAN Jun, DANG Chuangyin, et al. Game analysis of enterprises' replacement of emergency supplies and government's monitoring[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2018, 38(10):2611-2619.
[9]	NIKKHOO F, BOZORGI-AMIRI A, HEYDARI J. Coordination of relief items procurement in humanitarian logistic based on quantity flexibility contract[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2018, 31: 331-340. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.05.024
[10]	张琳, 田军, 杨瑞娜, 等. 数量柔性契约中的应急物资采购定价策略研究[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2016, 36(10):2590-2600. doi: 10.12011/1000-6788(2016)10-2590-11
	ZHANG Lin, TIAN Jun, YANG Ruina, et al. Emergency supplies procurement pricing strategy under quantity flexible contract[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2016, 36(10):2590-2600.
[11]	张琳, 李孟涛, 田军. 考虑灾后现货市场采购的应急物资供应协议企业实物与原材料储备策略研究[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2022, 42(4):1001-1012. doi: 10.12011/SETP2021-1621
	ZHANG Lin, LI Mengtao, TIAN Jun. Research on physical reserve and raw material reserve strategy of emergency material supply agreement enterprises considering post-disaster spot market procurement[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2022, 42(4):1001-1012.
[12]	刘阳, 田军, 冯耕中, 等. 供应商风险规避下基于期权契约的政企联合储备应急物资模型[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(11):102-111.
	LIU Yang, TIAN Jun, FENG Gengzhong, et al. The model of joint relief supplies reserves of the governmentand a risk-averse supplier based on an option contract[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2020, 29(11):102-111.
[13]	扈衷权, 田军, 冯耕中. 基于期权采购的政企联合储备应急物资模型[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2018, 38(8):2033-2044.
	HU Zhongquan, TIAN Jun, FENG Gengzhong. The model of joint emergency supplies reserves of governments and enterprises based on option procurement[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2018, 38(8):2033-2044.
[14]	扈衷权, 田军, 王鹏, 等. 政企联合储备模式下应急物资储备及采购定价研究[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2020, 40(12):3181-3193. doi: 10.12011/SETP2020-0057
	HU Zhongquan, TIAN Jun, WANG Peng, et al. A research on emergency supplies reserve and purchase pricing under the mode of joint reserve of governments and enterprises[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2020, 40(12):3181-3193.

物资名称	储备模型	委储比例	一次性补贴	政府总成本	供应链总利润
木方	供应链最优	0.32	3.33×10³	2.77×10⁶	-3.00×10⁶
	政府成本最优	0.00	6.46×10³	3.08×10⁶	-3.08×10⁶
		0.20	4.49×10³	2.95×10⁶	-3.01×10⁶
		0.40	2.90×10³	2.68×10⁶	-3.01×10⁶
		0.60	2.54×10³	2.58×10⁶	-3.02×10⁶
		0.80	2.52×10³	2.57×10⁶	-3.05×10⁶
		1.00	2.52×10³	2.57×10⁶	-3.07×10⁶
	供应链协调	0.32	3.33×10³	2.77×10⁶	-3.00×10⁶
编织袋	供应链最优	1.00	1.47	8.55×10⁶	-6.88×10⁶
	政府成本最优	0.00	2.46	1.01×10⁷	-1.01×10⁷
		0.20	2.46	1.01×10⁷	-9.36×10⁶
		0.40	1.59	8.77×10⁶	-8.64×10⁶
		0.60	1.47	8.55×10⁶	-8.05×10⁶
		0.80	1.47	8.55×10⁶	-7.47×10⁶
		1.00	1.47	8.55×10⁶	-6.88×10⁶
	供应链协调	1.00	1.47	8.55×10⁶	-6.88×10⁶
块石	供应链最优	0.00	66.5	9.72×10⁶	-9.70×10⁶
	政府成本最优	0.00	66.5	9.70×10⁶	-9.70×10⁶
		0.20	56.6	9.51×10⁶	-1.13×10⁷
		0.40	44.6	8.87×10⁶	-1.29×10⁷
		0.60	35.7	8.09×10⁶	-1.46×10⁷
		0.80	31.7	7.61×10⁶	-1.64×10⁷
		1.00	30.4	7.41×10⁶	-1.82×10⁷
	供应链协调	0.00	66.5	9.72×10⁶	-9.72×10⁶

[1]	DENG Kailong, XU Ting, CHEN Yixin, LIU Wenyu, LAI Xinhe, ZHANG Zhishun. Optimization of camouflage strategies and Nash equilibrium solution in traffic supervision based on game theory [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2026, 36(3): 212-220.
[2]	HUANG Jicheng, CHEN Wenjing, JIA Nan. Research on security resource allocation optimization of critical infrastructure [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2026, 36(2): 218-226.
[3]	REN Lipeng, TONG Ruipeng. Evolutionary game research on multi-body dynamic governance of intelligent coal mine safety risks [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2026, 36(2): 253-261.
[4]	FENG Bo, LIU Long. Game analysis and improvement of risk bearing mechanism for delivery rider-involved traffic accidents [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(S1): 14-20.
[5]	CHU Hongrui, HUANG Bin. Study on enterprise-led emergency supply reserve system using Bayesian persuasion theory [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(8): 244-252.
[6]	WU Jiani, LIU Zhijing, WANG Ying. Hybrid reserve decision-making for emergency supplies considering social donations under option contract mechanism [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(7): 225-232.
[7]	SHEN Haibin, HU Ling, LI Na, ZHANG Wenyi, XIE Runqi. Evolutionary game analysis of dangerous goods transportation in civil aviation under dynamic penalty mechanism: case of airline and ground service agents [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(5): 23-31.
[8]	LI Zhiqiang, FAN Yanjia, SUN Yu. Research on evolutionary game of emergency management audit [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(4): 233-240.
[9]	WANG Xiaoqing, CHEN Kebing, QIAN Chengjiang, SONG Jian. System dynamics analysis of online public opinion governance for chemical emergencies under evolutionary games [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(2): 95-103.
[10]	FANG Danhui, ZENG Niping, WANG Peipei. Scenario deduction of sudden mountain rainstorm disaster considering psychological factors of emergency subjects [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(12): 221-229.
[11]	LIU Jin'e, JIANG Ming, YUN Ke, XIE Xumeng, LI Yongquan, WANG Banqiao. Safety evaluation of lifting machinery based on game theory-improved cloud model [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(11): 81-91.
[12]	JIANG Fuchuan, YANG Hao, WANG Hao, JIN Fengchun, AN Zewen. Coal mine safety investment decision model based on combination empowerment and SPA-TOPSIS [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(8): 86-92.
[13]	WANG Dongying, CHEN Xiaoping, LIU Quan, ZHAO Tianhao, YAN Xu. Risk ranking of oil and gas pipeline based on improved cloud model-FMEA [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(5): 61-68.
[14]	NIU Lixia, HAN Xixiu, ZHAO Rui. Effect of "rush game" on unsafe driving of take-away riders: a perspective based on evaluation of stress perception [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(4): 17-25.
[15]	CHEN Na, HU Yitong, YUAN Yingfeng, QIN Xiangnan, LIU Jun. Risk assessment of firefighter training injury based on game theory combinatorial weighting and cloud model [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(4): 232-238.