Study on influence of informal group cohesion on miners' unsafe behavior

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.07.2031

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to analyze the mechanism of informal group cohesion on miners' unsafe behaviors, safety psychological capital and inner safety impetus were introduced to construct a chain mediation model. Based on the four hypotheses proposed in the literature review, a structured questionnaire was made using four scales of informal group cohesion, safety psychological capital, inner safety impetus and unsafe behavior. 516 valid samples of miners were retained and quantitatively studied after screening. The chain mediation model was validated by sample data analysis and mediating effect test. The results show that informal group cohesion can not only directly affect miners' unsafe behavior, but also indirectly affect miners' unsafe behavior through the independent mediating role of safety psychological capital and inner safety impetus and the chain mediating role of safety psychological capital and inner safety impetus. Enhancing informal group cohesion and improving safety psychological capital and inner safety impetus can effectively reduce the frequency of miners' unsafe behavior and prevent accidents.

Key words: informal group cohesion, unsafe behavior, safety psychological capital, inner safety impetus, chain mediation

LI Naiwen, FANG Xiaokai, NIU Lixia. Study on influence of informal group cohesion on miners' unsafe behavior[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(7): 9-15.

Figures/Tables 5

Fig.1

Tab.1

Tab.2

Fig.2

Tab.3

References 21

[1]	李琰, 赵梓焱, 田水承, 等. 矿工不安全行为研究综述[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2016, 12(8):47-54.
	LI Yan, ZHAO Ziyan, TIAN Shuicheng, et al. Review of research on unsafe behavior of miners[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2016, 12(8):47-54.
[2]	张江石, 吴悠, 郭金山, 等. 煤矿环境对矿工个体行为的影响机制研究[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2021, 21(2):649-655.
	ZHANG Jiangshi, WU You, GUO Jinshan, et al. Influence mechanism of the coal mine environment on the miners' individual behaviors[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2021, 21(2):649-655.
[3]	那赟, 栗继祖, 冯国瑞. 群体认知对个体不安全行为意向的跨层次影响[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(2):13-19.
	NA Yun, LI Jizu, FENG Guorui. A cross-level influence of group cognition on individual unsafe behavior intention[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019, 29(2):13-19.
[4]	MOSCHIS G P. Social comparison and informal group influence[J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 1976, 13(3): 237-244. doi: 10.1177/002224377601300304
[5]	BERG P. Representing worker interests: past, present, and future[J]. Social Service Review, 2015, 89(2): 393-406. doi: 10.1086/681629
[6]	陈晓宽, 栗继祖. 行为传播视角下群体压力对矿工不安全行为意向的影响[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2023, 19(1):79-84.
	CHEN Xiaokuan, LI Jizu. Influence of group pressure on unsafe behavior intention of miners from perspective of behavior propagation[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2023, 19(1):79-84.
[7]	李妙慧, 栗继祖. 群体动力对矿工不安全行为意向的影响研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(7):48-55. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2021.07.007
	LI Miaohui, LI Jizu. Study on influence of group dynamics on miners' unsafe behavior intention[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(7):48-55. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2021.07.007
[8]	GHOSH S, DHALL A, SEBE N, et al. Automatic prediction of group cohesiveness in images[J]. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 2020, 13(3):1677-1690. doi: 10.1109/TAFFC.2020.3026095
[9]	DOBBINS G H, ZACCARO S J. The effects of group cohesion and leader behavior on subordinate satisfaction[J]. Group & Organization Studies, 1986, 11(3): 203-219.
[10]	ALBERT V, CARRON, et al. The development of an instrument to assess cohesion in sport teams: the group environment questionnaire[J]. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 1985, 7(3):244-266.
[11]	徐碧琳, 宋爱玲. 非正式组织成因的实证研究[J]. 现代财经-天津财经学院学报, 2005, 25(4):56-61.
	XU Bilin, SONG Ailing. The empirical research on formational factors of informal group[J]. Modern Finance and Economics-Journal of Tianjin University of Finance and Economics, 2005, 25(4):56-61.
[12]	李乃文, 刘孟潇, 牛莉霞. 矿工心智游移特点的思维取样研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(10):6-11. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2019.10.002
	LI Naiwen, LIU Mengxiao, NIU Lixia. A thought sampling study of characteristics of miners' mind wandering[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019, 29(10):6-11. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2019.10.002
[13]	RIASUDEEN S, SINGH P, KANNADHASAN M. The role of job satisfaction behind the link between group cohesion, collective efficacy, and life satisfaction[J]. Psychological Studies, 2019, 64(4):401-410. doi: 10.1007/s12646-019-00501-6
[14]	王璟. 矿工安全心理资本与不安全行为的关系研究[D]. 西安: 西安科技大学, 2016.
	WANG Jing. The relationship between miner safety psychological capital and unsafe behavior[D]. Xi'an: Xi'an University of Science and Technology, 2016.
[15]	段锦云, 杨静, 朱月龙. 资源保存理论:内容、理论比较及研究展望[J]. 心理研究, 2020, 13(1):49-57.
	DUAN Jinyun, YANG Jing, ZHU Yuelong. Conservation of resources theory: Content, theoretical comparisons and prospects[J]. Psychological Research, 2020, 13(1):49-57.
[16]	李乃文. 高危岗位员工安全内驱力缺失分析与对策[J]. 安全, 2020, 41(12):1-6.
	LI Naiwen. Analysis and countermeasures on lacking of inner safety impetus of employee in high-risk post[J]. Safety & Security, 2020, 41(12):1-6.
[17]	DECI E L, RYAN R M. The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior[J]. Psychological Inquiry, 2000, 11(4):227-268. doi: 10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
[18]	余涛. 中远佐敦公司合作型冲突管理方式对员工工作内驱力影响研究[D]. 青岛: 山东科技大学, 2019.
	YU Tao. Research on the influence of cooperative conflict management approach on staff internal driving force of Jotun COSCO[D]. Qingdao: Shandong University of Science and Technology, 2019.
[19]	HOBFOLL S E. Conservation of resource caravans and engaged settings[J]. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 2011, 84(1): 116-122. doi: 10.1111/joop.2011.84.issue-1
[20]	CARRON A V. Cohesiveness in sport groups: interpretations and considerations[J]. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 1982, 4(2): 123-138.
[21]	王丹. 辱虐管理对矿工不安全行为的影响研究[J]. 经济与管理, 2012, 26(10):65-70.
	WANG Dan. Abusive supervision on the miners' unsafe behavior influence research[J]. Economy and Management, 2012, 26(10):65-70.

变量	M	S	1	2	3	4
1非正式群体凝聚力	4.00	0.68	1	—	—	—
2安全心理资本	3.72	0.54	0.372^**	1	—	—
3安全内驱力	4.20	0.67	0.635^**	0.568^**	1	—
4不安全行为	1.62	0.63	-0.788^**	-0.496^**	-0.703^**	1

模型	χ²/df	CFI	RMSEA	NNFI	SRMR
假设模型	1.674	0.987	0.037	0.983	0.032
完全中介模型	6.374	0.892	0.102	0.869	0.140
部分中介模型Ⅰ	3.546	0.949	0.070	0.938	0.106
部分中介模型Ⅱ	1.743	0.985	0.083	0.982	0.033
部分中介模型Ⅲ	3.587	0.939	0.071	0.927	0.107

作用路径	效应值	Boot 标准误	Boot CI 下限	Boot CI 上限	相对中介效应/%
总间接效应	-0.21	0.03	-0.27	-0.13	27.67
间接效应1	-0.05	0.02	-0.08	-0.02	6.28
间接效应2	-0.12	0.02	-0.17	-0.09	16.56
间接效应3	-0.04	0.01	-0.06	-0.02	4.83