Construction and validation of conceptual model of influencing factors of miners' unsafe behaviors

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2026.08.1906

Abstract

Abstract:

To effectively prevent UB among miners caused by occupational burnout and enhance mine safety production levels, this study employed a mixed-methods approach based on SOR theoretical framework to systematically analyze the causes and prevention strategies of miners' UB. First, integrating in-depth interviews and questionnaire survey data, the mechanisms through which occupational burnout and risk perception influenced UBs were examined from four dimensions: individual, equipment, work environment, and organizational management. Subsequently, a theoretical model was constructed incorporating these four dimensions, occupational burnout, risk perception, and UB. Finally, structural equation modeling was conducted using Smart PLS 4.0 software, and targeted prevention recommendations were proposed for regulatory agencies, mining enterprises, and miners based on the empirical results. The findings indicate that occupational burnout acts as a critical mediating channel through which risk perception affects UB, and all four dimensions of job burnout exert their impacts on UB entirely via this mediator. Individual factors, equipment, work environment and organizational management not only directly predict job burnout, but also indirectly affect UB through the mediating path of job burnout. Meanwhile, equipment, work environment and organizational management can directly affect risk perception and further exert indirect effects on UB through the mediating effect of risk perception (p < 0.05).

Key words: miner, unsafe behavior (UB), occupational burnout, risk perception, stimulus-organism-response (SOR) theory

CLC Number:

X936

Liu Jiao, Meng Yuhui, Hao Limin, Wang Lulu, Tong Ruipeng. Construction and validation of conceptual model of influencing factors of miners' unsafe behaviors[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2026, 36(8): 37-45.

Figures/Tables 8

Fig.1

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Fig.2

Fig.3

Table 4

Table 5

References 20

[1]	王大龙, 王冰山, 曹睿, 等. 煤矿安全管理行为交互机制与模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2025, 35(5):32-38. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2025.05.1094
	Wang Dalong, Wang Bingshan, Cao Rui, et al. Interaction mechanism and model of coal mine safety management behaviors[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(5): 32-38. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2025.05.1094
[2]	刘卫东. 高温环境对煤矿井下作业人员影响的调查研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2007, 3(3):43-45.
	Liu Weidong. Survey of effect for coal mine workers in heat stress[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2007, 3(3): 43-45.
[3]	陈子涵, 李磊, 欧阳有鹏, 等. 非正式组织视角下煤矿工人群体动力对不安全行为驱动因素分析[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2024, 20(3):126-133.
	Chen Zihan, Li Lei, Ouyang Youpeng, et al. Analysis on driving factors of group dynamics on unsafe behavior of coal miners from perspective of informal organization[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2024, 20(3): 126-133.
[4]	陈伟珂, 刘国义. SOR理论框架下施工人员安全行为研究:情绪智力与具身认知视角[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2021, 21(5):2139-2148.
	Chen Weike, Liu Guoyi. On the safety behaviors of the building workers from the perspective of the emotional intelligence and embodied recognition under the framework of the SOR theory[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2021, 21(5): 2139-2148.
[5]	李琰, 毛钰, 张燕. 建筑工人应急行为影响机制[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(10):1-7. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2021.10.001
	Li Yan, Mao Yu, Zhang Yan. Influence mechanism of construction workers' emergency behavior[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(10): 1-7. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2021.10.001
[6]	许加明, 田萍, 闵兢, 等. 养老护理员工作倦怠现状及影响因素研究[J]. 护理管理杂志, 2023, 23(7):579-582.
	Xu Jiaming, Tian Ping, Min Jing, et al. Research on the current situation and influencing factors of job burnout of nursing assistants for the elderly[J]. Journal of Nursing Administration, 2023, 23(7): 579-582.
[7]	许红军, 王楠, 袁子晴. 民航飞行员工作倦怠影响因素研究[J]. 经营与管理, 2024(6):144-152.
[8]	周建亮, 胡飞翔, 邢艳冬, 等. 工作压力、职业倦怠对建筑工人不安全行为的影响[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(11):14-22. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.11.2539
	Zhou Jianliang, Hu Feixiang, Xing Yandong, et al. Influence of job stress and burnout on unsafe behaviors of construction workers[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(11): 14-22. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.11.2539
[9]	Basahel A M. Safety leadership, safety attitudes, safety knowledge and motivation toward safety-related behaviors in electrical substation construction projects[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2021, 18(8): DOI:10.3390/ijerph18084196.
[10]	叶贵, 越宏哲, 叶鑫. 建筑工人内隐和外显安全态度对安全行为的影响[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34(12):2-7. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2024.12.0222
	Ye Gui, Yue Hongzhe, Ye Xin. Impact of implicit and explicit safety attitudes on safety behavior among construction workers[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(12): 2-7. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2024.12.0222
[11]	Liang Qi, Zhou Zhiyuan, Ye Gui, et al. Unveiling the mechanism of construction workers' unsafe behaviors from an occupational stress perspective: a qualitative and quantitative examination of a stress-cognition-safety model[J]. Safety Science, 2022, 145: DOI:10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105486.
[12]	孙剑, 黄倩倩, 章伯阳, 等. 事故体验对建筑工人不安全行为意向的影响机理研究[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2025, 25(4):1424-1433.
	Sun Jian, Huang Qianqian, Zhang Boyang, et al. Investigating the influence mechanism of accident experience on construction workers'intentions to engage in unsafe behaviors[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2025, 25(4): 1424-1433.
[13]	贺宜, 孙昌鑫, 彭建华, 等. 电动载货三轮车风险行为及影响因素分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2023, 53(2):413-420.
	He Yi, Sun Changxin, Peng Jianhua, et al. Risk behaviors and influencing factors of cargo electric tricycles[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Engineering and Technology Edition), 2023, 53(2): 413-420.
[14]	张芷璐, 卢国斌, 姜福川. 基于自我控制和职业倦怠中介作用的矿工心理韧性对安全绩效的影响[J]. 煤矿安全, 2022, 53(2):246-251.
	Zhang Zhilu, Lu Guobin, Jiang Fuchuan. Influence of mental toughness of miners on safety performance based on mediating effect of self-control and job burnout[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2022, 53(2): 246-251.
[15]	Peker M, Doğru O C, Meᶊe G. Role of supervisor behavioral integrity for safety in the relationship between top-management safety climate, safety motivation, and safety performance[J]. Safety and Health at Work, 2022, 13(2): 192-200. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2022.03.006 pmid: 35664909
[16]	付汉良, 曹文娜, 王萌萌, 等. 建筑工人工作倦怠对不安全行为的影响:正念的调节作用[J]. 工程管理学报, 2025, 39 (1):128-133.
	Fu Hanliang, Cao Wenna, Wang Mengmeng, et al. The effect of job burnout on unsafe behavior among construction workers: the moderating role of mindfulness[J]. Journal of Engineering Management, 2025, 39(1): 128-133.
[17]	禹敏, 栗继祖, 秦文静. 心理社会安全氛围对矿井工人不安全行为的影响[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(7):34-40. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.07.1357
	Yu Min, Li Jizu, Qin Wenjing. Influence of PSC on miners' unsafe behaviors[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(7): 34-40. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.07.1357
[18]	田方圆, 田水承, 李红霞, 等. 新冠疫情下民众心理特征与应急管理体系完善[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(11):30-36. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2020.11.005
	Tian Fangyuan, Tian Shuicheng, Li Hongxia, et al. Psychological symptoms of public under COVID-19 outbreak and improvement of emergency management system[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(11): 30-36. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2020.11.005
[19]	Maslach C, Jackson S E. The measurement of experienced burnout[J]. Journal of Occupational Behavior, 1981, 2: 99-113. doi: 10.1002/job.v2:2
[20]	李超平, 时勘. 分配公平与程序公平对工作倦怠的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2003, 35(5):677-684.
	Li Chaoping, Shi Kan. The influence of distributive justice and procedural justice on job burnout[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2003, 35(5): 677-684.

变量名称	变量维度	Cronbach's α系数	项目个数
职业倦怠	情绪耗竭	0.956	5
	去个性化	0.945	4
	低成就感	0.934	6

维度	情绪耗竭	去个性化	低成就感	个体因素	设备因素	作业环境	组织管理	风险敏感性	风险应对倾向	UB
情绪耗竭	1	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
去个性化	0.887^**	1	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
低成就感	0.342^**	0.328^**	1	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
个体因素	-0.358^**	-0.362^**	-0.824^**	1	—	—	—	—	—	—
设备因素	-0.192^**	-0.208^**	-0.836^**	0.782^**	1	—	—	—	—	—
作业环境	-0.324^**	-0.338^**	-0.865^**	0.808^**	0.821^**	1	—	—	—	—
组织管理	-0.298^**	-0.312^**	-0.876^**	0.839^**	0.855^**	0.861^**	1	—	—	—
风险敏感性	0.682^**	0.695^**	-0.368^**	0.342^**	0.428^**	0.392^**	0.385^**	1	—	—
风险认知评估	0.124	0.126	-0.806^**	0.709^**	0.783^**	0.761^**	0.786^**	0.603^**	—	—
风险应对倾向	-0.286^**	-0.304^**	-0.883^**	0.806^**	0.858^**	0.854^**	0.870^**	0.388^**	1	—
UB	0.918^**	0.916^**	0.284^**	-0.291^**	-0.158	-0.270^**	-0.252^**	0.689^**	-0.256^**	1

维度	Cronbach's α	rho_A	CR	AVE	项目个数
个体因素	0.836	0.837	0.884	0.657	5
设备因素	0.845	0.846	0.891	0.623	4
作业环境	0.872	0.873	0.905	0.612	6
组织管理	0.913	0.914	0.928	0.588	7
职业倦怠	0.785	0.849	0.875	0.634	12
风险感知	0.823	0.892	0.894	0.568	18
UB	0.942	0.943	0.951	0.698	9

影响路径	初始样本	样本均值	标准差	t统计量	p值	假设	接受/拒绝
个体因素→风险感知	0.018	0.016	0.058	0.310	0.757	H₆	拒绝
个体因素→职业倦怠	-0.342	-0.345	0.098	3.490	0.002^**	H₁	接受
设备因素→风险感知	0.428	0.430	0.055	7.782	0.000^**	H₇	接受
设备因素→职业倦怠	0.438	0.443	0.115	3.809	0.000^**	H₂	接受
作业环境→风险感知	0.262	0.260	0.057	4.596	0.000^**	H₈	接受
作业环境→职业倦怠	-0.412	-0.412	0.105	3.924	0.000^**	H₃	接受
组织管理→风险感知	0.251	0.253	0.063	3.384	0.001^**	H₉	接受
组织管理→职业倦怠	-0.281	-0.277	0.128	2.195	0.048^*	H₄	接受
职业倦怠→UB	0.928	0.930	0.025	37.120	0.000^**	H₅	接受
风险感知→UB	0.312	0.308	0.025	12.480	0.000^**	H₁₀	接受

影响路径	初始样本	样本均值	标准差	t统计量	p值	假设	接受/拒绝
个体因素→职业倦怠→UB	-0.317	-0.312	0.091	3.484	0.001^**	H_11a	接受
个体因素→风险感知→UB	0.006	0.005	0.018	0.333	0.739	H_12a	拒绝
设备因素→职业倦怠→UB	0.406	0.412	0.107	3.794	0.000^**	H_11b	接受
设备因素→风险感知→UB	0.134	0.132	0.017	7.794	0.000^**	H_12b	接受
作业环境→职业倦怠→UB	-0.382	-0.383	0.097	3.938	0.000^**	H_11c	接受
作业环境→风险感知→UB	0.082	0.080	0.018	4.556	0.000^**	H_12c	接受
组织管理→职业倦怠→UB	-0.261	-0.258	0.119	2.193	0.028^*	H_11d	接受
组织管理→风险感知→UB	0.078	0.078	0.020	3.900	0.000^**	H_12d	接受