融合模糊控制理论的煤矿粉尘防护设施量化评价

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2017.05.024

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (5): 134-139.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2017.05.024

融合模糊控制理论的煤矿粉尘防护设施量化评价

魏勇副教授

平顶山工业职业技术学院机械工程学院,河南平顶山 467001

收稿日期:2017-01-04 修回日期:2017-03-20 出版日期:2017-05-20 发布日期:2020-10-30
作者简介:魏勇 (1974—),男,河南平顶山人,硕士,副教授,主要从事职业危害防控技术研究。E-mail:subtway@126.com。
基金资助:
河南省科技攻关项目(142102310184)。

Fuzzy control theory based quantitative evaluation of dust protection facilities in coal mine

WEI Yong

School of Mechanical Engineering, Pingdingshan Industrial College of Technology, Pingdingshan Henan 467001,China

Received:2017-01-04 Revised:2017-03-20 Online:2017-05-20 Published:2020-10-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为改进对煤矿粉尘防护设施降尘效果的评价,建立一种融合模糊控制理论的量化评价方法。首先,针对粉尘防护设施建立多层次评价指标体系,并以逻辑斯蒂方程为主体,构建评价因子的隶属度函数;其次,基于模糊控制理论,研究构造评价论域模糊器和解模糊器,并利用层次分析法(AHP)确定评价因子权重,建立模糊控制量化评价(FCQE)数学模型;最后在某矿掘进工作面实施量化评价。结果表明:FCQE法改进了AHP法获取评价论域的方式,无需依赖专家的评判,但在评价因子权重中又融入专家知识,这样直接采集数据后即可快速实现量化评价。对比该矿粉尘检测数据,评价结果与实际情况比较吻合。

关键词: 模糊控制量化评价(FCQE), 煤矿, 粉尘防护, 逻辑斯蒂方程, 层次分析法(AHP)

Abstract: In order to improve the evaluation of the dust removal effect of coal mine dust protection facilities, a quantitative evaluation method with fuzzy control theory was developed. Firstly, a multi-level assessment index system was established for the dust protection facilities, and membership functions of the evaluation factors were constructed with Logistic equation as the main body. Secondly, based on the fuzzy control theory, a fuzzifier and a defuzzifier of evaluation universe were studied and established, and the weights of the evaluation factors were determined by using AHP. A mathematical model of FCQE was built. Finally, a quantitative evaluation was carried out at a certain mine heading face. The results show that the FCQE method improves the way to obtain the evaluation universe in AHP, which means there is no longer the need to rely on the experts' judgment (the expert knowledge is integrated into the weight of the evaluation factors), so that the quantitative evaluation can be achieved quickly after collecting the data directly, and that the evaluation results conform to the actual situation.

Key words: fuzzy control quantitative evaluation(FCQE), coal mine, dust protection, Logistic equation, analytic hierarchy process(AHP)

中图分类号:

X964
TD714

魏勇. 融合模糊控制理论的煤矿粉尘防护设施量化评价[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(5): 134-139.

WEI Yong. Fuzzy control theory based quantitative evaluation of dust protection facilities in coal mine[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2017, 27(5): 134-139.

参考文献

[1] 齐继阳,任丽娜,高健,等.基于模糊层次分析法的海洋平台健康评估[J].机械设计与制造,2016(6):218-221.
QI Jiyang,REN Lina,GAO Jian,et al.Research on evaluation of health status of offshore platforms structure in service [J].Machinery Design & Manufacture,2016(6):218-221.
[2] 柯小玲,冯敏,刁凤琴.改进模糊综合评价法在煤矿区生态安全评价中的应用[J].矿业安全与环保,2016,43(6):32-36.
KE Xiaoling,FENG Min,DIAO Fengqin.Application of improved fuzzy comprehensive evaluation in ecological safety evaluation in coal mining areas[J].Mining Safety & Environmental Protection,2016,43(6):32-36.
[3] 徐杨,周延,孙鑫,等.基于模糊层次分析法的矿井安全综合评价[J].中国安全科学学报,2009,19(5):147-152.
XU Yang,ZHOU Yan,SUN Xin.et al.Synthesized assessment method for coal mine safety based on fuzzy analytic hierarchy process[J].China Safety Science Journal,2009,19(5):147-152.
[4] PADILLO-RUIZ Alejandro, TORIJA Antonio J, RAMOS-RIDAO A F, et al.Application of the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process in multi-criteria decision in noise action plans: prioritizing road stretches[J]. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2016, 81: 45-55.
[5] SUTADIAN Arief Dhany,MUTTIL Nitin,YILMAZ Abdullah Gokhan,et al.Using the analytic hierarchy process to identify parameter weights for developing a water quality index[J].Ecological Indicators, 2017,75:220-233.
[6] WANG Lixin.A course in fuzzy systems and control[M]. New York:Prentice-Hall International Inc.,1997:1-116.
[7] AQ1020—2006,煤矿井下粉尘综合防治技术规范[S].
AQ1020-2006,Technical specification for prevention and control of coal mine dust[S].
[8] 魏勇.炮掘工作面粉尘防护评价因子及隶属度函数的确定[J].矿业安全与环保,2016,43(3):103-106.
WEI Yong.Determination of evaluation factors and its membership for dust protection in heading face by blasting[J]. Mining Safety & Environmental Protection,2016,43(3):103-106.
[9] 魏勇,白晓.机掘工作面粉尘防护设施影响因子及其隶属度函数的确定[J].工业安全与环保,2016,42(10):88-90.
WEI Yong,BAI Xiao.The determination of evaluation factors and its membership function of the dust protection facilities on coal tunneling face[J]. Industrial Safety and Environmental Protection,2016,42(10):88-90.
[10] 马素平,寇子明.喷雾降尘机理的研究[J].煤炭学报,2005,30(3):297-300.
MA Suping,KOU Ziming. Study on mechanism of reducing dust by spray[J].Journal of China Coal Society, 2005,30(3):297-300.
[11] 魏勇.煤矿采掘装备喷雾降尘效率曲线拟合[J].矿山机械,2015,43(11):130-133.
WEI Yong. Curve fitting of spraying and dust suppression efficiency of mining equipment in colliery[J]. Mining & Processing Equipment,2015,43(11):130-133.
[12] 贺仲雄.模糊数学及其应用[M].天津:天津科学技术出版社,1983:188-215.
HE Zhongxiong.Fuzzy mathematics and its application[M].Tianjin:Tianjin Science and Technology Press, 1983:188-215.
[13] SAATY T L. How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process[J].European Journal of Operation Research, 1990,48(1): 9-26.
[14] 李洪兴,汪群,段钦治,等.工程模糊数学[M].天津:天津科学技术出版社,1993:137-274.
LI Hongxing,WANG Qun,DUAN Qinzhi,et al. Engineering fuzzy mathematics[M]. Tianjin:Tianjin Science and Technology Press, 1993:137-274.
[15] GBZ2.1—2007,工作场所有害因素职业接触限值第1部分:化学有害因素[S].
GBZ2.1-2007,Occupational exposure limits for hazardous agents in the workplace part1:chemical hazardous agents[S].

融合模糊控制理论的煤矿粉尘防护设施量化评价

Fuzzy control theory based quantitative evaluation of dust protection facilities in coal mine

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	杨明, 贾改妮, 刘毛毛, 全星苑. 我国煤矿噪声研究进展科学知识图谱分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(5): 177-184.
[2]	唐飞, 王云刚, 杜炳成, 孔祥岩. 基于优化马尔可夫模型的煤矿事故死亡人数预测[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(4): 122-128.
[3]	熊钰, 孔德中, 杨胜利, 吴桂义, 左宇军, 程占博. 大倾角工作面煤壁稳定性的云模型综合辨识[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(3): 144-151.
[4]	黄杰, 张显峰. 以南疆为例的区域暴恐袭击风险评估^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(2): 192-199.
[5]	贺琦, 张金锁, 王萍. 煤矿高层管理者工作压力与安全绩效关系研究^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(9): 29-35.
[6]	白春, 王来贵, 刘书贤, 路沙沙, 聂伟. 煤矿采动对RC框架结构抗震性能影响试验研究^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(9): 174-183.
[7]	姜福川, 周师, 吴增彤, 钟基超, 张书豪, 张雪芳. 基于熵权-TOPSIS法的煤矿安全投入决策分析^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(7): 24-29.
[8]	成连华, 周瑞雪, 严瑾, 郭慧敏. 煤矿应急救援能力成熟度评价模型构建及应用^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(7): 180-186.
[9]	王刚, 商荦真, 刘学麟, 唐礼, 程前. 采用AHP-熵权法的巷道启封中毒窒息致因研究^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(7): 187-192.
[10]	宿国瑞, 贾宝山, 王鹏, 申琢. 基于多源异构数据的煤矿安全管理效果评估^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(6): 64-69.
[11]	刘大山, 陈晓春, 多英全, 师立晨. 化工园区地震Na-Tech事件快速风险评估方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(2): 127-134.
[12]	栗婧, 王真, 秦亚茹, 汪振, 罗江昊. 不同噪声强度对煤矿工人作业失误率的影响研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(2): 179-184.
[13]	杨天姿, 王铁骊, 彭恒明, 段海林. 小微企业生产安全事故应急脆弱性评价^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(12): 176-183.
[14]	吴耀男, 林雷, 任新温, 王龙庭, 刘志慧, 刘增凯. 一种基于逻辑结构数的改进型FMEA方法^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(10): 97-104.
[15]	吴仁彪, 何宇翔, 贾云飞. 基于改进层次分析法的重点人员风险评价方法^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(10): 112-118.