多级安全信息不对称所致事故模式研究

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2017.07.004

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为给事故预防与调查提供有效方法和依据,运用信息科学与安全科学方法,开展多级安全信息不对称所致事故模式研究。基于信息流动的一般模型,构建安全系统中安全信息流动的一般模型;分析安全系统中引发安全信息不对称的因素,并构建“信源-预测-决策-执行”多级安全信息不对称的事故致因模式;根据事故案例,分析验证多级安全信息不对称的事故致因模式的可行性和可靠性。结果表明:多级安全信息不对称的事故致因模式主要包括“真信源—安全信源”信息不对称、“安全信源—安全信宿”信息不对称和“安全信宿—安全信宿”信息不对称等3种事故致因模式,且具有充分的实用性与可行性。

关键词: 安全模型, 安全信息, 信息不对称, 事故致因, 模式

Abstract: To provide an effective basis and method for accident prevention and accident investigation, the model for accident resulting from multilevel safety information asymmetry was studied by using both the information science method and the safety science method. Firstly, based on the general model of information flow, a general model of safety information flow in safety system was constructed. Secondly, the factors causing safety information asymmetry were analyzed, and an accident-causing model of multilevel safety information asymmetry was built. Finally, according to the accident case, the feasibility and reliability of the accident-causing model of multilevel safety information asymmetry were analyzed and verified. The results show that there are three models of accident-causing model of multilevel safety information asymmetry, they are real information source-safety information source information asymmetry model, safety information source-safety information home information asymmetry model, and safety information home-safety information home information asymmetry model, and the accident-causing model of multilevel safety information asymmetry has sufficient practicability and feasibility.

Key words: safety model, safety information, information asymmetry, accident-causing, mode

中图分类号:

X913

李思贤, 吴超, 王秉. 多级安全信息不对称所致事故模式研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(7): 18-23.

LI Sixian, WU Chao, WANG Bing. Study on model for accident resulting from multilevel safety information asymmetry[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2017, 27(7): 18-23.

参考文献

[1] HUGHES B P, NEWSTEAD S, ANUND A, et al. A review of models relevant to road safety[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2015, 74(1):250-270.
[2] SWUSTE P, GULIJK C V, ZWAARD W. Safety metaphors and theories, a review of the occupational safety literature of the US, UK and The Netherlands, till the first part of the 20th century[J]. Safety Science, 2010, 48(8):1 000-1 018.
[3] SWUSTE P, GULIJK C V, ZWAARD W, et al. Occupational safety theories, models and metaphors in the three decades since World War II, in the United States, Britain and the Netherlands: A literature review[J]. Safety Science, 2014, 62(1):16-27.
[4] SURRY J. Industrial Accident research: a human engineering approach[J]. Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine, 1969,11(9):492-493.
[5] 覃容, 彭冬芝. 事故致因理论探讨[J]. 华北科技学院学报, 2005, 2(3):1-10.
QIN Rong, PENG Dongzhi. Discuss of the accident-causing theory[J]. Journal of North China Institute of Science and Technology, 2005, 2(3):1-10.
[6] LAWRENCE A C. Human error as a cause of accidents in gold mining[J]. Journal of Safety Research, 1974, 6(2):78-88.
[7] 吴超. 安全信息认知通用模型及其启示[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2017,13(3):1-7.
WU Chao. Construction of a general safety information cognitive model and its implications[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2017,13(3):1-7.
[8] SMIDTS C, SHEN S H, MOSLEH A. The IDA cognitive model for the analysis of nuclear power plant operator response under accident conditions. part I: problem solving and decision making model[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 1997, 55(1):51-71.
[9] MOSLEH A, CHANG Y H. Model-based human reliability analysis: prospects and requirements[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2004, 83(2):241-253.
[10] 钟义信. 信息科学原理[M]. 北京:北京邮电大学出版社,1996:3-21.
[11] 赵潮锋, 周西华. 安全信息缺失事故致因理论的初步研究[J]. 世界科技研究与发展,2012,34(1):6-9.
ZHAO Chaofeng, ZHOU Xihua. Preliminary study on theory ofaccident-causing based on safety information missing[J]. World Sci-Tech R & D,2012,34(1):6-9.
[12] 王知津, 王茉瑶. 信息的属性和特性:基于Shannon通信模型的理解[J]. 情报探索,2011,31(11):1-6.
WANG Zhijin, WANG Moyao. Attributes and characteristics of information:understanding based on the communication model of Shannon[J]. Information Research,2011,31(11):1-6.
[13] 国家安全生产监督管理总局. “7·23”甬温线特别重大铁路交通事故调查报告[EB/OL].(2011-12-28).http://www.chinasafety.gov.cn/newpage/Contents/Channel_5498/2011/1228/160577/content_160577.htm.
[14] 黄浪, 吴超, 贾楠. 安全理论模型构建的方法论研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2016,26(12):1-6.
HUANG Lang, WU Chao, JIA Nan. Study on methodology of safety theoretical model construction[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2016,26(12):1-6.
[15] 吴超. 安全科学方法论[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2016:160-165.
[16] 杜学胜, 王恩元, 何学秋,等. 安全信息有效沟通在增强企业安全文化中的作用[J]. 中国安全科学学报,2009,19(2):78-84.
DU Xuesheng, WANG Enyuan, HE Xueqiu,et al. The role of effective communication of safety information in enhancing safety culture[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2009,19(2):78-84.