个体死亡对施工安全事故学习的影响路径分析

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2018.04.026

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (4): 151-156.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2018.04.026

个体死亡对施工安全事故学习的影响路径分析

张羽讲师, 卞晓莉, 刘红勇教授

西南石油大学土木工程与建筑学院,四川成都 610500

收稿日期:2018-01-26 修回日期:2018-03-18 出版日期:2018-04-28 发布日期:2020-09-28
作者简介:张羽(1986—),男,江西新余人,博士,讲师,硕士生导师,主要从事安全知识与行为、安全监管博弈等方面的研究。E-mail:307871884@qq.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助(71401026);教育部人文社科基金资助(14XJCZH004); 西南石油大学“学术关”基金资助(201331010045)。

Path analysis of impact of individual death on construction safety accident learning

ZHANG Yu, BIAN Xiaoli, LIU Hongyong

School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu Sichuan 610500, China

Received:2018-01-26 Revised:2018-03-18 Online:2018-04-28 Published:2020-09-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为提高事故知识获取的效率,考虑安全事故中个体可能死亡的固有特点,将幸存者拥的有信息和调查组层级纳入事故学习模型中,同时引入事故特征和其他信息来源作为调节变量,构建个体死亡对事故学习影响机制概念模型,并通过78份施工事故调查报告采集数据,运用路径分析法进行验证。研究表明:幸存者拥有的信息对还原事故过程和确定事故直接原因有显著的正向影响,但同时存在“死亡悖论”;调查组层级的影响总体不显著;持续时间短和作业空间开阔的事故特征及其他信息来源会对上述关系产生调节作用;应细化见证者访谈手册,在隐蔽空间推广使用监控设备,公开全部事故资料及建立调查组层级动态调整机制。

关键词: 个体死亡, 施工安全, 事故学习, 路径分析法, 死亡悖论

Abstract: For the sake of improving the accident learning efficiency, a model was built for impact of individual death on construction safety accident learning, after considering the individual death as the inherent characteristics of safety accidents, the information the survivors and the survey group have, and taking the accident characteristics and other sources of information as regulation variables. On the basis of the data collected from 78 investigation reports on construction accidents, the model was verified by using path analysis. The results show that the information from the survivors is helpful in understanding accident and identifying the direct cause, but the "death paradox" exists; the overall impact of the survey group is not significant; the data from other sources as well as the short duration and the open space of the accident have a regulating effect on the relationship above; the witness interview manual should be refined; use of monitoring equipment in the closed spaces should be promoted; all the accident data should be made public; and a adjustment mechanism of the investigation unit should be established.

Key words: individual death, construction safety, accident learning, path analysis, death paradox

中图分类号:

X928.01

张羽, 卞晓莉, 刘红勇. 个体死亡对施工安全事故学习的影响路径分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(4): 151-156.

ZHANG Yu, BIAN Xiaoli, LIU Hongyong. Path analysis of impact of individual death on construction safety accident learning[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2018, 28(4): 151-156.

参考文献

[1] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 2017年前三季度房屋市政工程生产安全事故情况通报[EB/OL].(2017-10-25).http://www.mohurd.gov.cn/wjfb/201710/t20171031_233782.html.
[2] 张涛, 王大洲. 从工程事故中学习的过程及其制度安排[J]. 工程研究—跨学科视野中的工程, 2013, 5(3): 309-317.
ZHANG Tao, WANG Dazhou. On the learning process from the engineering accidents and the relevant institutional arrangements[J]. Journal of Engineering Studies, 2013, 5(3): 309-317.
[3] 薛澜, 沈华, 王郅强. “7.23重大事故”的警示:中国安全事故调查机制的完善与改进[J].国家行政学院学报, 2012(2): 23-28.
XUE Lan, SHEN Hua, WANG Zhiqiang. The warning of the 7.23 major accident-the improvement of China's safety accident investigation mechanism[J]. Journal of China National School of Administration, 2012(2): 23-28.
[4] 高恩新. 特大生产安全事故的归因与行政问责:基于65份调查报告的分析[J]. 公共管理学报, 2015, 12(4): 58-70.
GAO Enxin. The attribution and administrative accountability of mass serious industrial accidents in contemporary China: based on analysis of 65 investigation reports[J]. Journal of Public Management, 2015, 12(4): 58-70.
[5] 曾辉, 陈国华. 对建立第三方事故调查机制的探讨[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2011, 7(6): 81-86.
ZENG Hui, CHEN Guohua. Analysis of mechanism for establishment of third party accident investigation[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2011, 7(6): 81-86.
[6] SMITH D, ELLIOTT D. Exploring the barriers to learning from crisis: organizational learning and crisis[J]. Management Learning, 2007, 38(5): 519-538.
[7] LINDBERG A K, HANSSON S O, ROLLENHAGEN C. Learning from accidents-what more do we need to know?[J]. Safety Science, 2010, 48 (6): 714-721.
[8] 曾明荣, 王兴. 中欧事故报告与调查处理比较研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2015, 11(5): 148-153.
ZENG Mingrong, WANG Xing. Comparative research on reporting, investigation and disposal of work safety accidents in China and EU[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2015, 11(5): 148-153.
[9] ROED-LARSEN S, STOOP J. Modern accident investigation-four major challenges[J]. Safety Science, 2012, 50(6): 1 392-1 397.
[10] SVEDUNG I, RASMUSSEN J. Graphic representation of accident scenarios: mapping system structure and the causation of accidents[J]. Safety Science, 2002, 40(5): 397-417.
[11] SKLET S. Comparison of some selected methods for accident investigation[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2004,111(1/2/3): 29-37.
[12] FAHLBRUCH B, SCHBEL M. SOL-Safety through organizational learning: a method for event analysis[J]. Safety Science, 2011, 49(1): 27-31.
[13] 张玲, 陈国华. 事故调查分析方法与技术述评[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2009, 19(4): 169-176.
ZHANG Ling, CHEN Guohua. Review on accident investigation and analysis methods[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2009, 19(4): 169-176.
[14] LUNDBERG J, ROLLENHAGEN C, HOLLNAGEL E. What you find is not always what you fix: how other aspects than causes of accidents decide recommendations for remedial actions[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2010, 42(6), 2 132-2 139.
[15] COZE J C L. Disasters and organisations: from lessons learnt to theorising[J]. Safety Science, 2008, 46(1): 132-149.
[16] JIANG Li, YU Guangtao, LI Yongjuan, et al. Perceived colleagues’ safety knowledge/behavior and safety performance: safety climate as a moderator in a multilevel study[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2010, 42(2): 1 468-1 476.
[17] 梁振东, 刘海滨. 个体特征因素对不安全行为影响的SEM研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2013, 23(2): 27-33.
LIANG Zhendong, LIU Haibin. SEM-based study on effects of individual characteristics factors on unsafe behavior[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2013, 23(2): 27-33.
[18] 高伟明, 曹庆仁, 许正权. 新生代员工心理资本对安全行为的影响: 基于安全动机和安全知识的中介作用[J].科学决策, 2016(1): 21-41.
GAO Weiming, CAO Qingren, XU Zhengquan. Impact of millennial employees psychological capital on safety behavior: the mediating effect of safety motivation and safety knowledge[J]. Scientific Decision Making, 2016(1): 21-41.
[19] 马振鹏, 俞秀宝, 吴宗法, 等. 安全知识对安全绩效的影响机制研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2016, 26(7): 141-146.
MA Zhenpeng, YU Xiubao, WU Zongfa, et al. Research on influence mechanism of safety knowledge on safety performance[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2016, 26(7): 141-146.
[20] ASHBY N J, KONSTANTINIDIS E, YECHIAM E. Choice in experiential learning: true preferences or experimental artifacts?[J]. Acta Psychologica, 2017, 174(3): 59-67.
[21] 吴明隆. 结构方程模型: AMOS的操作与应用[M]. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2010: 4-5.

个体死亡对施工安全事故学习的影响路径分析

Path analysis of impact of individual death on construction safety accident learning

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	胡韫频, 李超, 李宗亮, 杨道合. 大跨度钢结构施工安全风险评价IHFACS-BN模型及应用^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(8): 147-154.
[2]	于光玉, 李慧民. 旧工业建筑改造施工安全影响机制研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(7): 120-129.
[3]	张羽, 谯丽, 岑康. 死亡悖论视角下群体性主观概率偏差仿真研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(6): 37-43.
[4]	梁娜. 铁路营业线施工安全风险分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(S1): 27-31.
[5]	王军武, 胡蝶, 吴寒, 王梦雨, 刘登辉. 小直径深层排水隧道盾构施工安全风险评价[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(6): 113-120.
[6]	熊若鑫, 宋元斌, 王宇轩, 段彦娟. 基于CNN的3D姿势估计在建筑工人行为分析中的应用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(7): 64-69.
[7]	申玲, 唐晔文, 牟月. 基于Cloud-BN的装配式住宅构件吊装安全评价[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(10): 147-153.
[8]	陈伟, 乔治, 熊付刚, 牛力, 杨道合. 装配式建筑施工安全事故预防SD-MOP模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(1): 19-24.
[9]	李伟, 阳富强. 基于SLP的地铁施工场地安全布局优化方案[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(1): 161-166.
[10]	徐晟, 倪清清. 跨省承包对施工安全状况演变的影响研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(9): 103-108.
[11]	江新, 杜海文, 袁轩, 胡文佳, 郑霞忠, 孙正熙. 神经网络范式下硐室群施工安全风险预警研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(2): 181-186.
[12]	韩豫, 刘嘉伦, 张泾杰, 冯志达. 建筑工人危险认知结果的差异特性[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(9): 20-26.
[13]	白晓平, 蒲涛. 数据驱动的施工安全评价模型研究与应用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(9): 134-139.
[14]	陈伟, 乔治, 王伟震, 张开蓝, 牛力, 邓聪. 暴雨灾害引发施工安全事故应急处置SD模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(6): 169-174.
[15]	刘文, 赵挺生, 张亚静, 陈昱锟, 周炜. 地铁盾构施工安全风险规律分析与对策^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(10): 130-136.