安全违规行为的人际传染效应研究*

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2021.08.004

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (8): 22-29.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2021.08.004

• 安全社会科学与安全管理 • 上一篇下一篇

安全违规行为的人际传染效应研究^*

刘林^1,2 副教授, 吴金南³ 教授, 常志朋³ 教授

1 安徽工业大学复杂系统多学科管理与控制安徽普通高校重点实验室,安徽马鞍山 243032;
2 江苏大学管理学院,江苏镇江 212013;
3 安徽工业大学商学院,安徽马鞍山 243032

收稿日期:2021-05-14 修回日期:2021-07-19 出版日期:2021-08-28 发布日期:2022-02-28
作者简介:刘林 (1983—),女,安徽池州人,博士研究生,副教授,主要研究方向为中小企业安全管理。E-mail:liulinahut@aliyun.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助(71874072);教育部人文社会科学青年基金资助(18YJCZH102);安徽省哲学社会科学规划项目(AHSKQ2019D015);安徽普通高校重点实验室开放基金重点项目资助(CS2020-ZD01)。

Study on interpersonal contagion effect of safety violation behaviors

LIU Lin^1,2, WU Jinnan³, CHANG Zhipeng³

1 Key Laboratory of Multidisciplinary Management and Control of Complex Systems of Anhui Higher Education Institutes, Anhui University of Technology, Ma'anshan Anhui 243032, China;
2 School of Management, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang Jiangsu 212013, China;
3 School of Business, Anhui University of Technology, Ma'anshan Anhui 243032, China

Received:2021-05-14 Revised:2021-07-19 Online:2021-08-28 Published:2022-02-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为预防群体安全违规行为的发生,应用社会学习理论和社会信息加工理论,采用倾向值匹配(PSM)方法分析来自全国25个省和直辖市的1 294个企业员工样本数据,检验安全违规行为是否存在人际传染效应,并探讨这种传染效应在不同类型企业和员工之间是否存在异质性。结果表明:安全违规行为的人际传染效应具有普适性,广泛存在于不同危险程度、员工规模和产权性质的企业,以及不同用工形式和性别的员工中;中小企业、非正式员工和女性员工更容易受到同事安全违规行为的影响,表现出更强的人际传染效应。

关键词: 安全违规行为, 人际传染, 社会学习, 社会信息加工, 倾向值匹配(PSM), 稳健性检验

Abstract: In order to prevent occurrence of group safety violations, using social learning theory and social information processing theory,PSM method was used to analyze data of 1 294 employees from 25 provinces and municipalities in China. To examine whether there was human-to-human contagion effect of safety violations, and to explore whether there was heterogeneity among different types of enterprises and employees. The results show that interpersonal contagion effect widely exists in enterprises with different risk levels, staff size and ownership, as well as employees with different employment forms and gender. Specifically, a stronger interpersonal contagion effect was found in middle and small-sized enterprises, informal employees and female employees.

Key words: safety violation behaviors, interpersonal contagion, social learning, social information processing, propensity score matching(PSM), robust testing

中图分类号:

X915.2

刘林, 吴金南, 常志朋. 安全违规行为的人际传染效应研究^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(8): 22-29.

LIU Lin, WU Jinnan, CHANG Zhipeng. Study on interpersonal contagion effect of safety violation behaviors[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(8): 22-29.

参考文献

[1] 中华人民共和国应急管理部重特大事故调查报告(2003—2020)[EB/OL].(2021-02-04).https://www.mem.gov.cn/gk/sgcc/tbzdsgdcbg/.
[2] 高恩新. 特大生产安全事故的归因与行政问责:基于65份调查报告的分析[J]. 公共管理学报, 2015, 12(4): 58-70.
GAO Enxin. The attribution,blame game of mass serious industrial accidents in contemporary China: based on analysis of 65 investigation reports[J]. Journal of Public Management, 2015, 12(4): 58-70.
[3] 陈洋, 李爽, 张宇航, 等. 基于演化博弈的不安全行为的羊群效应研究[J]. 技术经济, 2020, 39(2): 146-157.
CHEN Yang, LI Shuang, ZHANG Yuhang,et al. Research on herding effect in unsafe behavior based on evolutionary game[J]. Technology Economics, 2020,39(2):144-155.
[4] GUO B H W, YIU T W, GONZALEZ V A. Predicting safety behavior in the construction industry: development and test of an integrative model[J]. Safety Science, 2016, 84: 1-11.
[5] CHRISTIAN M S, BRADLEYJ C, WALLACE J C, et al. Workplace safety: a meta-analysis of the roles of person and situation factors[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2009, 94(5): 1 103-1 127.
[6] 高伟明, 曹庆仁. 心理资本、安全知识与安全行为:基于煤矿企业新生代员工的实证研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(11): 72-76.
GAO Weiming, CAO Qingren. Psychological capital, safety knowledges and safety behavior: based on new generation employees of coal mining enterprises[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2015, 23(11): 72-76.
[7] 孙世梅, 高小迪, 孙赫, 等. 天然气管道施工事故行为原因研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(6): 8-13.
SUN Shimei ,GAO Xiaodi,SUN He ,et al. Study on causes of accidents in construction of natural gas pipelines [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(6): 8-13.
[8] 牛莉霞, 刘勇, 李乃文. 正念对安全绩效影响的链式中介机制分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(6): 14-22.
NIU Lixia,LIU Yong,LI Naiwen. Analysis on chain intermediary mechanism of mindfulness's influence on safety performance[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(6): 14-22.
[9] NEAL A, GRIFFIN M A. A study of the lagged relationships among safety climate, safety motivation, safety behavior, and accidents at the individual and group levels[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2006, 91(4): 946-953.
[10] DAHL O, KONGSVIK T. Safety climate and mindful safety practices in the oil and gas industry[J]. Journal of Safety Research, 2018, 64(2): 29-36.
[11] 陈华仲, 刘素霞, 梅强. 安全领导力对员工安全行为影响的元分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(5): 7-13.
CHEN Huazhong, LIU Suxia, MEI Qiang. Meta-analysis on impact of safety leadership on employees' safety behavior [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(5): 7-13.
[12] 曹庆仁, 李凯, 李静林. 管理者行为对矿工不安全行为的影响关系研究[J]. 管理科学, 2011, 24(6): 69-78.
CAO Qingren, LI Kai, LI Jinglin. Impact of manager's behavior on coalminer's unsafe behavior[J]. Journal of Management Science, 2011, 24(6): 69-78.
[13] 邓宏斌, 李乃文. 基层管理者辱虐管理和员工安全参与关系研究[J]. 管理学报, 2013, 10(12): 1 778-1 784.
DENG Hongbin, LI Naiwen. The study on the relationship of basic level administrators' abusive supervision and employees' safety participation [J]. Chinese Journal of Management, 2013, 10(12): 1 778-1 784.
[14] 程恋军, 仲维清. 群体规范对矿工不安全行为意向影响研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2015, 25(6): 15-21.
CHENG Lianjun,ZHONG Weiqing. Research on effect of group norms on unsafe behavior intentions of miners [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2015, 25(6): 15-21.
[15] 王世龙, 谢光明. 社会网络中的行为传染研究述评[J]. 人民论坛, 2016(8): 164-166.
[16] VEDADI A, WARKENTIN M. Can secure behaviors be contagious? a two-stage investigation of the influence of herd behavior on security decisions[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 2020, 21(2): 428-459.
[17] 焦媛媛, 李智慧. 同侪影响的内涵、产生机理及其在管理学中的研究展望:基于社交网络情境 [J]. 南开管理评论, 2020, 23(1): 213-224.
JIAO Yuanyuan, LI Zhihui. A research on the connotation and formation mechanism of peer influence and its prospects in the field of management: based on the online social networking context [J]. Nankai Business Review,2020, 23(1): 213-224.
[18] ZHANG R P, LINGARDI H, NEVIN S. Development and validation of a multilevel safety climate measurement tool in the construction industry[J]. Construction Management & Economics, 2015, 33(10): 818-839.
[19] 王丹, 关莹, 贾倩. 基于社会网络分析的建筑工人不安全行为传播路径研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2018, 14(9): 182-188.
WANG Dan, GUAN Ying, JIA Qian. Research on propagation path of construction workers' unsafe behavior based on social network analysis[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2018, 14(9): 182-188.
[20] CHEN Z, TAKEUCHI R, SHUM C. A social information processing perspective of coworker influence on a focal employee[J]. Organization Science, 2013, 24(6): 1 618-1 639.
[21] LIANG Huakang, ZHANG Shoujian. Impact of supervisors' safety violations on an individual worker within a construction crew[J]. Safety Science, 2019, 120: 679-691.
[22] LIANG Huakang, LIN Kenyu , ZHANG Shoujian, et al. The impact of coworkers' safety violations on an individual worker: a social contagion effect within the construction crew[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research & Public Health, 2018, 15(4): 773-793.
[23] 李超平, 徐世勇. 管理与组织研究常用的60个理论[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2019:411-419.
[24] MCLAIN, DAVID L. Sensitivity to social information, social referencing, and safety attitudes in a hazardous occupation[J]. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 2014, 19(4): 425-436.
[25] GAO Ran, CHAN A P, UTAMA W P, et al. Multilevel safety climate and safety performance in the construction industry: Development and validation of a top-down mechanism[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2016, 13:DOI:10.3390/ijerph13111100.
[26] SALANCIK G R, PFEFFER J. A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1978, 23(2): 224-253.
[27] CHIABURU D S, HARRISON D A. Do peers make the place? Conceptual synthesis and meta-analysis of coworker effects on perceptions, attitudes, OCBs, and performance[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2008, 93(5): 1 082-1 103.
[28] MAN S S, CHAN A H S, WONG H M. Risk-taking behaviors of Hong Kong construction workers:a thematic study[J]. Safety Science, 2017, 98: 25-36.
[29] REASON J, PARKER D, LAWTON R. Organizational controls and safety: the varieties of rule-related behavior[J]. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 1998, 71(4): 289-304.
[30] ROSENBAUM P R, RUBIN D B. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects[J]. Biometrika, 1983, 70(1): 41-55.
[31] HECKMAN J J, ICHIMURA H, TODD P. Matching as an econometric estimator[J]. Review of Economic Studies, 1998, 65: 261-294.
[32] CALIENDO M, KOPEINIG S. Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching[J]. Journal of Economic Surveys, 2005, 22(1): 31-72.

安全违规行为的人际传染效应研究^*

Study on interpersonal contagion effect of safety violation behaviors

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李琼, 汪勇杰, 陈文强, 白鹏霞, 薛晨蕾. 公交驾驶员组织认同感对驾驶愤怒的影响:职业倦怠的中介作用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(5): 8-13.
[2]	陈巧, 刘素霞, 梅强, 张菁菁. 角色压力对员工安全行为影响的元分析:主管支持的调节作用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(5): 21-27.
[3]	凤四海, 王志杰, 邓捷, 辛耀娇, 贺元骅. 引入恐慌因素的元胞自动机应急疏散模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(4): 148-154.
[4]	曹淑超, 席鑫, 倪璟煜, 姚明. 考虑群组行为的楼梯瓶颈处行人流模拟^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(2): 28-33.
[5]	桑利斌, 栗继祖. 团队关系冲突对矿工安全绩效影响的跨层次研究^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(2): 51-58.
[6]	黄杰, 张显峰. 以南疆为例的区域暴恐袭击风险评估^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(2): 192-199.
[7]	陈述, 任亚萍, 席炎, 向蕾, 崔洁. 动态惩罚机制下企业安全生产行为演化分析^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(1): 51-57.
[8]	张明媛, 徐琴. 施工工人不安全行为传播模型与干预效果分析^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(12): 1-9.
[9]	晋良海, 刘硕, 殷双萍, 邵波, 陈述, 彭爽. 商业综合体导向标志空间秩序标定研究^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(12): 121-128.
[10]	冯亚娟, 邢仲超. 辱虐管理对安全绩效的曲线效应:领导信任的调节作用^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(11): 1-8.
[11]	王秉, 王渊洁, 章雅蕾, 吴超. 安全认同机制研究^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(10): 16-22.
[12]	冯亚娟, 邢仲超. 破坏性领导对安全绩效影响的条件过程分析^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(8): 14-21.
[13]	耿琦, 王维莉. 考虑小群体行为的建筑疏散试验研究^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(8): 172-179.
[14]	张羽, 谯丽, 岑康. 死亡悖论视角下群体性主观概率偏差仿真研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(6): 37-43.
[15]	何昌原, 张鹏, 李驰原, 王乙程, 刘昶. 中国安全文化学研究热点与演进:基于2010—2019年中国知网数据库的知识图谱分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(5): 152-159.