隧道火灾集中排烟系统排热效率预测方法

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.07.2276

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (7): 113-120.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.07.2276

隧道火灾集中排烟系统排热效率预测方法

何路¹(), 张晓锦¹, 王东伟², 朱国庆¹, 袁狄平³, 徐志胜⁴

¹ 中国矿业大学安全工程学院,江苏徐州 221116
² 中铁第六勘察设计院集团有限公司,天津 300308
³ 中国矿业大学深圳研究院,广东深圳 518057
⁴ 中南大学土木工程学院,湖南长沙 410075

收稿日期:2023-02-20 修回日期:2023-05-11 出版日期:2023-07-28
作者简介:
何路 (1991—),男,安徽铜陵人,博士,讲师,硕士生导师,从事长大隧道火灾防治方面研究。E-mail:helu119@outlook.com。
王东伟,正高级工程师
朱国庆,教授
袁狄平,教授
徐志胜,教授
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(52204252); 国家消防救援局科技计划(2023XFCX16); “双一流”建设提升自主创新能力课题(2022ZZCX05K02)

Prediction method of heat exhaust efficiency of centralized smoke exhaust system during tunnel fire

HE Lu¹(), ZHANG Xiaojin¹, WANG Dongwei², ZHU Guoqing¹, YUAN Diping³, XU Zhisheng⁴

¹ School of Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou Jiangsu 221116, China
² China Railway Liuyuan Group Co., Ltd., Tianjin 300308, China
³ Shenzhen Research Institute of China University of Mining and Technology, Shenzhen Guangzhou 518057, China
⁴ School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha Hunan 410075, China

Received:2023-02-20 Revised:2023-05-11 Published:2023-07-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为探究排热效率对火灾时隧道排烟系统排烟性能的影响,提出一种火灾情况下隧道集中排烟系统排热效率理论预测方法,分析各系统参数对排热效率的影响,开展1:20缩尺寸隧道模型火灾试验,并验证理论预测结果的准确性。研究表明:增加集中排烟系统排烟量是提高系统排热效率最有效的手段;随着火源功率的增加,排烟系统排热效率逐渐下降;系统总排热效率受排烟阀间距、尺寸、排烟道截面积、沿程阻力等参数影响较小,但在实际设计施工时需要考虑降阻密封的问题,避免系统阻力过大,排烟量降低。

关键词: 隧道火灾, 集中排烟, 排热效率, 通风网络, 排烟流速

Abstract:

In order to explore the impact of heat removal efficiency on the smoke exhaust performance of tunnel smoke exhaust systems during fires, this paper proposed a theoretical prediction method for the heat exhaust efficiency of tunnel centralized smoke exhaust system under fire conditions. The influences of various parameters on heat exhaust efficiency were analyzed. A series of experiments were carried out in a 1:20 scale model tunnel to verify the accuracy of the theoretical prediction results. Research shows that increasing the smoke exhaust volume of the centralized smoke exhaust system is the most effective means to improve the smoke exhaust capacity of the system. As the increase of the ignition sources power, the heat removal efficiency of the smoke exhaust system gradually decreases. The total heat removal efficiency of the system is less affected by parameters such as the spacing and size of smoke exhaust valves, cross-sectional area of smoke exhaust ducts and frictional resistance. However, in actual design and construction, it is necessary to consider the issue of reducing resistance and sealing to avoid excessive system resistance and reduce the smoke exhaust volume.

Key words: tunnel fire, centralized smoke, heat exhaust efficiency, ventilation network, smoke exhaust velocity

何路, 张晓锦, 王东伟, 朱国庆, 袁狄平, 徐志胜. 隧道火灾集中排烟系统排热效率预测方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(7): 113-120.

HE Lu, ZHANG Xiaojin, WANG Dongwei, ZHU Guoqing, YUAN Diping, XU Zhisheng. Prediction method of heat exhaust efficiency of centralized smoke exhaust system during tunnel fire[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(7): 113-120.

图/表 9

图1

图2

图3

图4

表1

表2

图5

表3

图6

参考文献 20

[1]	吴和俊, 崔海浩, 黄益良, 等. 侧向集中排烟应用于海底隧道的分析优化[J]. 消防科学与技术, 2017, 36(10): 1364-1368.
	WU Hejun, CUI Haihao, HUANG Yiliang, et al. Analysis and optimization on application of lateral centralized smoke extraction on seabed tunnel[J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2017, 36(10): 1364-1368.
[2]	YI Liang, WEI Ran, PENG Jinzhi, et al. Experimental study on heat exhaust coefficient of transversal smoke extraction system in tunnel under fire[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2015, 49: 268-278. doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2015.05.002
[3]	YUAN Jianping, FANG Zheng, TANG Zhi, et al. Influence of smoke damper configuration on point extraction ventilation system of an urban tunnel[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2016, 135: 99-106. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.01.085
[4]	GAO Yuan, YI Liang. Theoretical and experimental study on velocity of gas through exhaust inlet in transversal smoke extraction system of tunnel[C]. Seventh International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation, 2015: 1333-1336.
[5]	JIANG Xuepeng, LIU Meijia, WANG Jie, et al. Study on air entrainment coefficient of one-dimensional horizontal movement stage of tunnel fire smoke in top central exhaust[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2016, 60: 1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2016.07.010
[6]	JIANG Xuepeng, LIU Meijia, WANG Jie, et al. Study on induced airflow velocity of point smoke extraction in road tunnel fires[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2018, 71: 637-643. doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2017.09.020
[7]	洪瑶, 康建宏, 符策基. 基于PID方法的倾斜隧道中火灾烟气控制数值模拟[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2021, 50(4): 701-708.
	HONG Yao, KANG Jianhong, FU Ceji. Numerical simulation on control of fire smoke in inclined tunnels based on the PID method[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2021, 50(4): 701-708.
[8]	郝海清, 王凯, 张春玉, 等. 矿井皮带巷火灾风烟流场-区-网演化与调控规律[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2021, 50(4): 716-724.
	HAO Haiqing, WANG Kai, ZHANG Chunyu, et al. Evolution and regulation law of wind and smoke flow field area network in mine belt roadway fire[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2021, 50(4): 716-724.
[9]	曹更任, 蒋树屏, 周健, 等. 沉管隧道侧向集中排烟模式烟雾流动规律研究[J]. 中国公路学报, 2018, 31(1): 82-90.
	CAO Gengren, JIANG Shuping, ZHOU Jian, et al. Research on flow behavior of fumes by lateral concentrated smoke exhaust of immersed tunnel[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2018, 31(1): 82-90.
[10]	李彪. 城市地下交通联系隧道火灾烟气扩散特性及控制方法研究[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2019.
	LI Biao. Study on smoke diffusion characteristics and control methods methods of fire in urban underground traffic link tunnel[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2019.
[11]	阳东, 张众杰, 刘英利. 城市环廊隧道多种排烟方式组合排烟效果试验[J]. 中国公路学报, 2018, 31(11): 113-120.
	YANG Dong, ZHANG Zhongjie, LIU Yingli. Experiment of smoke control performance of hybrid ventilation strategy in urban traffic link tunnel[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2018, 31(11): 113-120.
[12]	徐浩倬, 李耀庄, 徐志胜, 等. 基于正交试验法的隧道集中排烟部分影响因素模拟试验研究[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2018, 15(10): 2590-2596.
	XU Haozhuo, LI Yaozhuang, XU Zhisheng, et al. Simulation experimental study on some influences factors of central exhaust in tunnels based on orthogonal test[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2018, 15(10): 2590-2596.
[13]	康建宏, 李晴, 周福宝, 等. 水蒸气模拟巷道火灾烟气的相似理论与数值计算[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2021, 50(4):691-700.
	KANG Jianhong, LI Qing, ZHOU Fubao, et al. Similarity theory and numerical modeling of fire smoke in tunnels simulated by water steam flows[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2021, 50(4):691-700.
[14]	ALPERT R L. SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering[M]. New York: Springer, 2016: 429-454.
[15]	王德明. 矿井通风与安全[M]. 徐州: 中国矿业大学出版社, 2007:45-47.
[16]	TAKEUCHI S, AOKI T, TANAKA F, et al. Modeling for predicting the temperature distribution of smoke during a fire in an underground road tunnel with vertical shafts[J]. Fire Safety Journal, 2017, 91: 312-319. doi: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2017.03.063
[17]	JI Jie, GAO Zenghan, FAN Chuangang, et al. A study of the effect of plug-holing and boundary layer separation on natural ventilation with vertical shaft in urban road tunnel fires[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2012, 55(21/22): 6032-6041. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2012.06.014
[18]	EPSTEIN M. Buoyancy driven exchange flow through small openings in horizontal partitions[J]. Journal of Heat Transfer, 1988, 110(4a): 885-893. doi: 10.1115/1.3250589
[19]	HE Lu, XU Zhisheng, MARKERT F, et al. Experimental study of heat exhaust efficiency with natural ventilation in tunnel fire: impact of shaft height and heat release rate[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2020, 201:DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104173. doi: 10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104173
[20]	JTG/T D70/2-02—2014, 公路隧道通风设计细则[S].
	JTG/T D70/2-02-2014, Guidelines for design of ventilation of highway tunnels[S].

隧道火灾集中排烟系统排热效率预测方法

Prediction method of heat exhaust efficiency of centralized smoke exhaust system during tunnel fire

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 9

参考文献 20

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

排烟阀尺寸/m²	排烟阀间距/m	排烟道沿程阻力系数^[20]	排烟道截面积/m²	火源功率/ MW	总排烟量/ ( kg·s^-1)
2	20	0.02	5	10	60
4	40	0.07	10	20	120
6	60	0.12	15	30	180
8	80	0.17	20	40	240
10	100	0.22	25	50	300

[1]	杜涛, 李萍, 王雨, 薛宪凯. 隧道火灾烟气温度及蔓延速度衰减特性[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(2): 140-145.
[2]	唐飞, 刘紫玮, 孙协鹏, 刘帅, 徐童. 沉管隧道内车厢火羽流的临界风速研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(2): 75-81.
[3]	魏连江, 周福宝, 夏同强, 王凯, 蒋合国, 王健. 矿井智能通风与灾变应急决策平台[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(9): 158-167.
[4]	徐童, 唐飞, 何清. 隧道内贴壁火顶棚射流温度及火焰特性研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(7): 93-97.
[5]	阳东, 李萍. 抑制倾斜隧道烟气流动热压主导模式的临界风压[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(5): 41-47.
[6]	杨宇轩, 程辉航, 龙增, 陈俊沣, 刘畅, 钟茂华. 阻塞效应对隧道火灾烟气温度影响试验研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(10): 135-141.
[7]	陶亮亮, 曾艳华, 刘振撼, 彭俊钦, 周小涵. 空气幕对地铁隧道火灾温度及流场的影响研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(7): 157-163.
[8]	姜学鹏, 陈欣格, 郭昆. 侧部点式排烟隧道火灾临界风速研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(3): 105-111.
[9]	陶亮亮, 王浩然, 刘振撼, 周小涵, 曾艳华. 水幕排烟系统对烟气控制及排烟效率的影响研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(2): 120-126.
[10]	王钟宽, 粟萌萌, 黄欣, 郑静如, 李子豪, 王国元. 不同坡度隧道火灾自熄现象试验研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(1): 186-191.
[11]	杨小龙, 张玉春, 高云骥, 靳开颜, 李智胜, 李涛. 公路隧道火灾烟气层高度判定方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(4): 147-153.
[12]	马砺, 李超华, 张鹏宇, 邱贤宗, 赵鑫. 封堵比例对隧道火灾顶棚温度分布的影响[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(2): 79-85.
[13]	姜学鹏, 谢智云, 于思维, 廖湘娟. 水下V形坡隧道烟气温度纵向衰减研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(9): 70-76.
[14]	孙少华, 程家骥, 丛北华, 杨万宝. 强制通风对隧道起火影响的全尺寸试验研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(10): 56-61.
[15]	李涛, 谢玮, 张玉春, 肖晗. 水雾强化隧道火灾火焰现象试验研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(3): 37-41.