中国安全科学学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (S1): 6-13.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2026.S1.0002

• 安全科学理论与方法 • 上一篇    下一篇

面向火电企业安全生产管理的综合评估体系研究

唐茂林1(), 孙志春2,**(), 范思萌3, 鞠洪晋4, 肖海平4   

  1. 1 国家能源集团, 北京 100009
    2 国电电力发展股份有限公司, 北京 100101
    3 中国安全生产科学研究院, 北京 100012
    4 华北电力大学 能源动力与机械工程学院, 北京 102206
  • 收稿日期:2026-02-14 修回日期:2026-04-12 出版日期:2026-06-30
  • 通信作者:
    ** 孙志春(1974—),男,山东金乡人,博士,教授级高级工程师,主要从事发电企业安全生产管理方面的工作。E-mail:。
  • 作者简介:

    唐茂林 (1984—),男,山东青岛人,本科,高级工程师,主要从事企业安全生产监督管理与安全生产管理体系建设等方面的工作。E-mail:。

    范思萌 工程师

    肖海平 副教授

Research on a comprehensive evaluation system for occupational safety management in thermal power plants

Tang Maolin1(), Sun Zhichun2,**(), Fan Simeng3, Ju Hongjin4, Xiao Haiping4   

  1. 1 China Energy Investment Co., Ltd., Beijing 100009, China
    2 GD Power Development Co., Ltd., Beijing 100101, China
    3 China Academy of Safety Science and Technology, Beijing 100012, China
    4 Energy Power and Mechanical Engineering Department, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China
  • Received:2026-02-14 Revised:2026-04-12 Published:2026-06-30

摘要:

为提升火电企业安全生产管理水平,以本质安全理念和物、人、环、管(4M)屏障理论为基础,结合安全生产标准化建设内容,构建系统化的安全生产管理评估指标体系。采用层次分析法(AHP)与灰色关联分析法(GRA)相结合,建立火电厂安全生产管理综合评估模型,并以6家火电企业为样本开展实例研究。研究结果表明:样本企业安全生产管理得分均值为63.88分,其中,3家企业低于均值,仅1家较为优秀。二级指标分析表明:风险管理和人员管理是各企业普遍存在问题的模块,得分分别为53.82和58.33分,低于13个模块平均分64.55分;三级指标风险工作计划得分仅49.04分,为主要缺陷元素,该模型可精准识别火电企业安全生产管理的系统性短板。

关键词: 火电企业, 安全生产管理, 指标体系, 层次分析法(AHP), 灰色关联分析法(GRA)

Abstract:

To enhance the safety management level of thermal power enterprises, a systematic evaluation index system was constructed based on the inherent safety concept and the 4M barrier theory, incorporating requirements from safety production standardization. By integrating AHP with GRA, a comprehensive evaluation model was established. An empirical study of six thermal power enterprises was conducted using their primary safety data. The results show that the average safety management score is 63.88 across the samples, with three enterprises below this average and only one performing excellently. Analysis of the secondary indicators reveals that "risk management" and "personnel management" are common weak modules, scoring 53.82 and 58.33 respectively, both below the overall average of 64.55 for all 13 modules. Within "risk management", the tertiary indicator "risk work planning" scores only 49.04, constituting the most significant deficiency. The proposed method can thus accurately pinpoint systemic shortcomings in safety management, providing data-driven support and a decision-making basis for optimizing key areas. This offers valuable insights for enhancing the overall safety performance of power enterprises.

Key words: thermal power enterprise, safety production management, index system, analytic hierarchy process (AHP), grey relational analysis (GRA)

中图分类号: