中国安全科学学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (S2): 73-79.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2025.S2.0016

• 安全工程技术 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于G1-CV-TOPSIS的复合岩体质量评价模型及应用

向平1,2(), 吴攀志1,2, 雍超源3,**(), 覃陆均1, 王科1, 袁云星3   

  1. 1 攀钢集团矿业有限公司, 四川 攀枝花 617000
    2 攀钢集团 攀枝花新白马矿业有限责任公司, 四川 攀枝花 617000
    3 中安国泰(北京)科技发展有限公司, 北京 102209
  • 收稿日期:2025-08-14 出版日期:2026-02-04
  • 通信作者:
    **雍超源(1997—),男,四川遂宁人,硕士,主要从事矿山安全等方面的工作。E-mail:
  • 作者简介:

    向 平 (1971—),男,四川达州人,本科,工程师,主要从事露天矿山生产规划、矿山安全等方面的工作。E-mail:

    吴攀志 工程师

    覃陆均 工程师

    王科 工程师

    袁云星 工程师

A composite rock mass quality evaluation model based on G1-CV-TOPSIS and its application

XIANG Ping1,2(), WU Panzhi1,2, YONG Chaoyuan3,**(), QIN Lujun1, WANG Ke1, YUAN Yunxing3   

  1. 1 Pangang Group Mining Co., Ltd., Panzhihua Sichuan 617000, China
    2 Panzhihua New White Horse Mining Co., Ltd., Panzhihua Group, Panzhihua Sichuan 617000, China
    3 Cathay Safety Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 102209, China
  • Received:2025-08-14 Published:2026-02-04

摘要:

为解决传统评价方法中指标权重分配主观性强、单一赋权局限性强等问题,构建一种以序关系分析法(G1)、变异系数法(CV)、逼近理想解排序法(TOPSIS)为核心的复合型岩体质量评价模型。首先,使用G1法对评价指标根据重要程度排序进行主观赋权,同时采用CV法根据数据的离散程度计算客观权重;其次,通过欧氏距离优化整合主、客观权重指数,确定综合权重指数;然后,基于综合权重指数,应用TOPSIS法计算各样本数据与正负理想解的距离,根据相对贴近度实现岩体质量的量化排序与等级划分;最后,将该模型运用于四川省某露天矿山,并与其他4种评价方法进行对比分析。结果表明:该模型计算得出测算区域的岩体质量等级主要为Ⅱ级,局部为Ⅲ级和Ⅴ级,较其他4种评价方法而言,G1-CV-TOPSIS岩体质量评价模型能够有效融合主观经验和客观数据,显著提高岩体质量评价的准确性和科学性。

关键词: 序关系分析法(G1), 变异系数法(CV), 逼近理想解排序法(TOPSIS), 岩体质量评价, 组合权重

Abstract:

To address the issues of strong subjectivity in weight allocation and the limitations of single-weighting methods in traditional rock mass evaluation, a composite rock mass quality assessment model was developed. This model integrated the G1 method, the CV method, and the TOPSIS. In this framework, subjective weights were assigned to evaluation indicators using the G1 method based on their importance ranking. Concurrently, objective weights were calculated by the CV method according to the dispersion of the data. The Euclidean distance was then applied to optimize and integrate these subjective and objective weights, resulting in a comprehensive weight index. Based on this integrated index, the TOPSIS method was used to calculate the distance between each sample and the positive/negative ideal solutions. The quantitative ranking and classification of rock mass quality were achieved by assessing the relative proximity. When applied to an open-pit mine in Sichuan Province and compared with four other evaluation methods, the rock mass quality in the surveyed area was primarily classified as Grade Ⅱ by the G1-CV-TOPSIS model, with localized areas identified as Grade Ⅲ and Grade Ⅴ. It is demonstrated through comparison that the proposed G1-CV-TOPSIS model effectively integrates subjective experience with objective data, thereby significantly improving the accuracy and scientific rigor of rock mass quality assessment.

Key words: method of order relation (G1), coefficient of variation (CV), technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS), rock mass evaluation, combined weighting

中图分类号: