地铁车辆故障模式危害度评估方法研究

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2018.05.008

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (5): 43-48.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2018.05.008

地铁车辆故障模式危害度评估方法研究

李磊¹ 讲师, 施继忠¹ 讲师, 张小强² 高级工程师

1浙江师范大学工学院,浙江金华 321004;
2中国铁路总公司调度部,北京100844

收稿日期:2018-02-04 修回日期:2018-04-01 出版日期:2018-05-28 发布日期:2020-11-25
作者简介:李磊(1980—),男,河南鹤壁人,博士,讲师,主要从事风险评估、故障诊断、决策分析等方面的研究。E-mail:chnlilei2003@163.com。
基金资助:
浙江省公益技术应用研究计划(2015C33015);浙江省教育厅项目(Y201432259)。

Research on method of evaluating harmfulness of metro vehicle failure mode

LI Lei¹, SHI Jizhong¹, ZHANG Xiaoqiang²

1 College of Engineering,Zhejiang Normal University,Jinhua Zhejiang 321004,China;
2 Dispatch Department,China Railway Corporation,Beijing 100844,China

Received:2018-02-04 Revised:2018-04-01 Online:2018-05-28 Published:2020-11-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为提高地铁车辆故障模式危害度评估的准确性,开发基于信息公理和区间二元语义的故障模式危害度评估方法。评估过程中,将语言值作为风险因子的评估值,并考虑存在评估值为区间语言值以及评估值缺失的情况,同时为避免转换过程中信息丢失,利用区间二元语义转换语言评估信息;提出基于区间二元语义的风险因子主客观权重求解方法;结合信息公理,提出基于区间二元语义的信息量计算方法,并根据信息量,评估故障模式危害度;最后,将该方法应用于实例并与其他方法进行对比分析,验证方法的可行性和有效性。结果表明:用该方法得到故障模式的危害度符合实际情况,其结果较用对比方法得到的更加客观、准确。

关键词: 信息公理, 区间二元语义, 综合权重, 故障模式, 危害度评估

Abstract: To improve the accuracy of evaluation of failure modes criticality of metro vehicle,a method based on information axiom and interval 2-tuple linguistic was worked out.In this paper,firstly,the evaluation value of risk factors adopted linguistic value,and the interval two tuple linguistic was used to deal with the linguistic value.Secondly,the subjective and objective weight of risk factors were considered simultaneously.Thirdly,the calculating method of information was presented based on information axiom and the interval two tuple linguistic,and according to the size of the information,the failure mode criticality was evaluated.Finally,the method was applied to an example and compared with other methods to verify its feasibility and effectiveness.The results show that failure mode criticality got by using the method conforms with the reality,and that the results are more objective and accurate than those obtained by using other methods.

Key words: information axiom, interval 2-tuple linguistic, comprehensive weight, failure mode, criticality evaluation

中图分类号:

X913.4

李磊, 施继忠, 张小强. 地铁车辆故障模式危害度评估方法研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(5): 43-48.

LI Lei, SHI Jizhong, ZHANG Xiaoqiang. Research on method of evaluating harmfulness of metro vehicle failure mode[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2018, 28(5): 43-48.

参考文献

[1] DAVIDSON G G,LABIB A W.Learning from failures:design improvements using a multiple criteria decision-making process[J].Journal of Aerospace Engineering,2003,217(4):207-216.
[2] ABDELGAWAD M,FAYEK A R.Risk management in the construction industry using combined fuzzy FMEA and fuzzy AHP[J].Journal of Construction Engineering & Management,2010,136(9):1028-1036.
[3] CHEN Jihkuang,LEE Yucheng.Risk priority evaluated by ANP in failure mode and effects analysis[J].Quality Tools & Techniques,2007,11(4):1-6.
[4] CHANG Changliang,LIU Pinghung,WEI Chiuchi.Failure mode and effects analysis using grey theory[J].Integrated Manufacturing Systems,2001,12(3):211-216.
[5] 吕干云,程浩忠,翟海保,等.基于改进灰色关联分析的变压器故障识别[J].中国电机工程学报,2004,24(10):121-126.
LYU Ganyun,CHENG Haozhong,ZHAI Haibao,etc.Fault diagnosis of power transformer based on improved grey relation analysis[J].Proceedings of the Chinese Society for Electrical Engineering,2004,24(10):121-126.
[6] LIU Huchen,YOU Jian Xin,CHEN Shouming,et al.An integrated failure mode and effect analysis approach for accurate risk assessment under uncertainty[J].IIE Transactions,2016,48(11):1027-1042.
[7] KUTLU Ahmet Can,EKMEKIOGLU Mehmet.Fuzzy failure modes and effects analysis by using fuzzy TOPSIS-based fuzzy AHP[J].Expert Systems with Applications,2012,39(1):61-67.
[8] LIU Huchen,LIU Long,LIU Nan,et al.Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis with extended VIKOR method under fuzzy environment[J].Expert Systems with Applications,2012,39(17):12 926-12 934.
[9] LIU Huchen,YOU Jianxin,You Xiaoyue,et al.A novel approach for failure mode and effects analysis using combination weighting and fuzzy VIKOR method[J].Applied Soft Computing,2015,28:579-588.
[10] TOORANLOO H S,AYATOLLAH A S.A model for failure mode and effects analysis based on intuitionistic fuzzy approach[J].Applied Soft Computing,2016,49:238-247.
[11] BOZDAG Erhan,ASAN Umut,SOYER Ayberk,et al.Risk prioritization in failure mode and effects analysis using interval type-2 fuzzy sets[J].Expert Systems with Applications,2015,42(8):4 000-4 015.
[12] ZHANG Huiming.The multi-attribute group decision making method based on aggregation operators with interval-valued2-tuple linguistic information[J].Applied Mathematical Modelling,2012,56(1/2):27–35.
[13] SUH Nam Pyo.Axiomatic design:advances and applications[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press,2001:39-40.
[14] KANNAN Devika,GOVINDAN Kannan,RAJENDRAN Sivakumar.Fuzzy axiomatic design approach based green supplier selection:a case study from Singapore[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2014,96:194-208.
[15] 李磊,王富章.基于改进多准则妥协解排序(VIKOR)法的铁路应急预案评估研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2012,22(8):29-36.
LI Lei,WANG Fuzhang.Research on evaluation of railway emergency plan based on improved VIKOR method[J].China Safety Science Journal,2012,22(8):29-36.
[16] BURILLO P,BUSTINCE H.Entropy on intuitionistic fuzzy sets and interval-valued fuzzy sets[J].IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems,1996,78(3):305-316.
[17] HERRERA F,MARTINEZ L.A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with word[J].IEEE Trans Fuzzy System,2000,8(6):746-52.

地铁车辆故障模式危害度评估方法研究

Research on method of evaluating harmfulness of metro vehicle failure mode

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	胡建华, 黄鹏莅, 周坦, 温观平, 杨东杰. 岩爆倾向性的改进有限云评价模型与工程应用^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(2): 90-98.
[2]	崔铁军, 李莎莎. 基于特征函数和联系数的系统故障模式识别[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(6): 1-6.
[3]	吴耀男, 林雷, 任新温, 王龙庭, 刘志慧, 刘增凯. 一种基于逻辑结构数的改进型FMEA方法^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(10): 97-104.
[4]	任乐峰, 孟祥坤, 陈国明. 滩海油气管道泄漏风险演化与评估[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(1): 159-164.
[5]	王睿, 朱江洪, 李延来. 基于共识模型与IN-TODIM的FMEA风险评估方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(9): 125-131.
[6]	宋志红, 耿秀丽. 基于HFACS的民机总装过程人为失误风险分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(6): 146-151.
[7]	韩放, 余建星, 陈海成, 吴朝晖, 雷云, 刘俊雄. FPSO模块吊装风险分析方法及应用研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(12): 123-128.
[8]	汪伟, 贾宝山, 祁云. 改进CRITIC修正G2-TOPSIS的钻孔自燃预测模型及应用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(11): 26-31.
[9]	苏晓倩, 庄越, 代华明. 新能源汽车燃爆风险与防控研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(5): 92-98.
[10]	张兆宁, 李文雅. 终端区管制系统风险因素分析的DEMATEL-ISM模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(10): 86-91.
[11]	舒畅, 姚安林, 刘帅峰, 徐涛龙, 王惠. 集对分析在海底管道失效可能性评价中的应用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(1): 82-87.
[12]	晋民杰，李辰，范英，杨井云. 基于损失费用的风险优先数分析方法研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2013, 23(9): 45-.
[13]	程敏，曹义敏. 基于模糊FMEA的长距离输水管线顶管施工风险分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2013, 23(9): 76-.
[14]	游波，吴超，石东平. 深井环境物理模拟系统的可靠性分析及其应用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2013, 23(9): 101-.
[15]	王安琪，胡瑾秋，张来斌，李文强. 地下储气库压缩机变工况下动态故障模式研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2013, 23(8): 139-.