Detailed explanations of 24Model and development of its 6th version

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.01.002

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to make 24Model achieve better application effect in tracing the cause of accident and formulating accident prevention countermeasures, the detailed scientific explanations of 24Model are critically important. By means of systematic literature review and comparative studies, the logical structure, causation modules and main features of 24Model were deeply examined. The research results show that: the primary theoretical foundations of 24Model are the series of Domino Theory proposed by HEINRICH and improved by BIRD etc., and the series of Swiss Cheese Model proposed by REASON and clarified by SHAPPELL & WIEGMANN, and another one is the Model of Managing for Outstanding Safety proposed by STEWART. The logical structure of the static form of 24Model is established by cause-effect relationship and falls into the sequential category of accident causation models. The specific meaning of the immediate, indirect, root, and radical accident causes in static 24Model can be found from the above three types of accident causation models, management system standards by ISO and the safety culture defined by the authors of this paper. The dynamic form of 24Model takes the process of behavioral conversion to establish its logical structure, and it fully expresses its systemic, dynamic, and non-linear features, and it forms a behavioral conversion system by linking organizational behaviors, namely influence behaviors, and individual behaviors, namely operative behaviors.

Key words: 24Model, logical structure, detailed explanation, systemic, behavior conversion

FU Gui, CHEN Yiran, XU Surui, CHEN Ping, YUAN Chenhui, WU Yali. Detailed explanations of 24Model and development of its 6^th version[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(1): 12-19.

Figures/Tables 6

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

References 35

[1]	傅贵, 郭孝臣. 事故致因理论的研究与应用简评[J]. 安全, 2019, 40(9): 1-4.
	FU Gui, GUO Xiaochen. A brief review on the study and application of accident causation theory[J]. Safety & Security, 2019, 40(9): 1-4.
[2]	SALVENDY G, LEHTO M. Models of accident causation and their application review and reappraisal[J]. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 1991, 8(2): 173-205. doi: 10.1016/0923-4748(91)90028-P
[3]	傅贵, 张兰, 孙世梅, 等, 事故致因理论对安全实务的支持作用[C]. 第28届全国高校安全工程专业学术年会论文集, 2016: 343-346.
[4]	陈萍, 李亚. 事故致因“2-4”模型的形成及其版本演变[J]. 工业安全与环保, 2017, 43(7):51-54.
	CHEN Ping, LI Ya. Research on the formation and the version evolution of 24Model[J]. Industrial Safety and Environmental Protection, 2017, 43(7):51-54.
[5]	傅贵. 安全科学学及其应用探讨[J]. 安全, 2019, 40(2):1-9.
	FU Gui. The science of safety science and its practical implications[J]. Safety & Security, 2019, 40(2):1-9.
[6]	QIAO Wanguan, LI Xinchun, LIU Quanlong. Systemic approaches to incident analysis in coal mines: comparison of the STAMP, FRAM and "2-4 " models[J]. Resources Policy, 2019, 63: DOI:10.1016/j. resourpol.2019.101453.
[7]	HUANG Wencheng, SHUAI Bin, ZUO Borui, et al. A systematic railway dangerous goods transportation system risk analysis approach: the 24model[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2019, 61: 94-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2019.05.021
[8]	ZHANG Zhenyu, PAN Xing.Accident cause analysis and prevention of commercial flight based on the "2-4 " Model[C]. 12^th International Conference on Reliability, Maintainability, and Safety (ICRMS 2018), 2018:363-369.
[9]	TACGIN E, SAGIR Z. Development of an intelligent knowledge base for identification of accident causes based on Fu et al. 's model[J]. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 2020:DOI:10.1080/10803548.2020.1831786.
[10]	傅贵. A sketch of thinking[EB/OL]. [2019-03-21].
[11]	隋鹏程. 伤亡事故分析与预防原理[J]. 冶金安全, 1982(5):1-8.
[12]	陈宝智, 隋鹏程. 安全原理与事故预测[M]. 北京: 冶金工业出版社, 1988:58-93.
[13]	ISO. Online browsing platform[EB/OL]. (2021-09-13). www.iso.org/obp.
[14]	GREENWOOD M, WOODS H M. The incidence of industrial accidents upon individuals with special reference to multiple accidents[M]. London:Industrial Fatigue Research Board, Medical Research Committee, 1919:2-28.
[15]	HEINRICH H W. Industrial accident prevention[M]. NewYork and McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1941:72-111.
[16]	HEINRICH H W, PETERSEN D, ROOS N. Industrial accident prevention(5^th Editor)[M]. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1980:28-32.
[17]	北川彻三日. 爆炸事故的分析[M]. 黄九华, 刘培德, 译. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 1984:304.
[18]	REASON J. Human error[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990:214-215.
[19]	STEWART J M. Managing for world class safety[M]. Toronto: John Wiley & Sons, 2002:6-26.
[20]	傅贵, 李宣东, 李军. 事故的共性原因及其行为科学预防策略[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2005, 5(1): 80-83.
	FU Gui, LI Xuandong, LI Jun. Common factors leading to accidents and behavior type research based on prevention[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2005, 5(1): 80-83.
[21]	傅贵, 陆柏, 陈秀珍. 基于行为科学的组织安全管理方案模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2005, 15(9): 21-27.
	FU Gui, LU Bai, CHEN Xiuzhen. Behavior based model for organization safety management[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2005, 15(9): 21-27.
[22]	傅贵. Act, Habit, Behavior的区别·knowledge, attitudes的含义[EB/OL].[2021-09-13].
[23]	中华人民共和国应急管理部. 江苏响水天嘉宜化工有限公司“3·21”特别重大爆炸事故调查报告[EB/OL].[2019-11-18].
[24]	中国政府网. 天津港“8·12”瑞海公司危险品仓库特别重大火灾爆炸事故调查报告[EB/OL].[2019-11-18].
[25]	ISO 45001-2018, Occupational health and safety management systems-requirements with guidance for use[S].
[26]	傅贵. 事故的定义及其重要性[J]. 现代职业安全, 2019(7):67-68.
[27]	GB 6442—1986, 企业职工伤亡事故调查分析规则[S].
	GB 6442-1986, The rules for the investigation and analysis of casualty accidents of enterprise staff and workers[S].
[28]	REASON J. Managing the risk of organizational accidents[M]. England: Ashgate Publishing Limited Gower House, 1997:17.
[29]	ISO. What is a management system? [EB/OL]. [2021-09-13]. https://www.iso.org/management-system-standards.html.
[30]	傅贵, 李长修, 邢国军, 等. 企业安全文化的作用及其定量测量探讨[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2009, 19(1): 86-92.
	FU Gui, LI Changxiu, XING Guojun, et al. Investigations into the impacts of enterprise safety culture and its quantitative measuring[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2009, 19(1): 86-92.
[31]	谭凌波, 田秋丽. 组织内影响行为研究评述及理论模型构建[J]. 生产力研究, 2014(7): 133-136.
[32]	STAVE K, HOPPER M.What constitutes systems thinking? a proposed taxonomy[C]. 25^th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, 2007:10-27.
[33]	傅贵, 殷文韬, 董继业, 等. 行为安全“2-4”模型及其在煤矿安全管理中的应用[J]. 煤炭学报, 2013, 38(7):1123-1129.
	FU Gui, YIN Wentao, DONG Jiye, et al. Behavior-based accident causation: the "2-4 " model and its safety implications in coal mines[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2013, 38(7):1123-1129.
[34]	傅贵. 安全学科结构的研究[M]. 墨尔本: 安全科学出版社, 2015:29-34.
	FU Gui. Studies on the structure of safety science[M]. Melbourne: Safety Science Publishing, 2015:29-34.
[35]	傅贵, 樊运晓, 佟瑞鹏, 等. 通用事故原因分析方法(第4版)[J]. 事故预防学报, 2016, 2(1): 7-12.
	FU Gui, FAN Yunxiao, TONG Ruipeng, et al. A universal methodology for the causation analysis of accidents (4^th Edition)[J]. Journal of Accident Prevention, 2016, 2(1): 7-12.