China Safety Science Journal ›› 2023, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (5): 128-133.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.05.1865
• Safety engineering technology • Previous Articles Next Articles
LIU Quanlong(), ZHANG Xiaolin, ZHANG Yueqian, QIU Zunxiang
Received:
2022-12-21
Revised:
2023-03-09
Online:
2023-05-28
Published:
2023-11-28
LIU Quanlong, ZHANG Xiaolin, ZHANG Yueqian, QIU Zunxiang. Construction of a database of standardized coal mine building regulation based on accident causation[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(5): 128-133.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.cssjj.com.cn/EN/10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.05.1865
Tab.1
Key coal mine building elements and similarity
检索事故 | 重点煤矿建筑要素及相似度 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
顶板事故 | 工作面(0.978 8) | 收作面(0.977 8) | 煤岩柱(0.977 1) | 回风巷(0.968 0) | 巷修巷(0.945 0) |
透水事故 | 煤岩柱(0.985 9) | 探水点(0.974 4) | 排水系统(0.969 9) | 内水仓(0.946 5) | 涌水量(0.937 2) |
瓦斯事故 | 回风巷(0.972 3) | 通风系统(0.970 9) | 煤岩柱(0.969 0) | 工作面(0.965 5) | 收作面(0.948 0) |
运输事故 | 输送机(0.977 8) | 缓冲器(0.977 3) | 供电系统(0.975 4) | 钢绞线(0.965 9) | 临点柱(0.963 1) |
机电事故 | 供电系统(0.972 8) | 过滤器(0.970 1) | 输送机(0.968 3) | 传感器(0.962 4) | 通风机(0.959 8) |
其他事故 | 架空线(0.578 2) | 通风机(0.569 5) | 带式输送机(0.568 8) | 进风巷(0.565 6) | 钢绞线(0.565 2) |
Tab.2
Judgmental regulation type
序号 | 类型名称 | 示例 |
---|---|---|
1 | 无前提条件构件属性一对一约束 | 检查孔取心率不宜小于75% |
2 | 有前提条件构件属性一对一约束 | 现浇混凝土支护,混凝土塌落度不应小于150 mm |
3 | 无前提条件构件属性一对多约束 | 工作面预注浆的段高宜为30~50 m |
4 | 有前提条件构件属性一对多约束 | Ⅱ类岩层中锚喷临时支护的段高宜为50~80 m |
5 | 无前提条件由多种构件进行的单一属性约束 | 检查孔终深宜大于井筒设计深度10 m |
6 | 有前提条件由多种构件进行的单一属性约束 | 灌筑混凝土下料导管,下料导管距离槽孔端面宜为1.5 m |
7 | 无前提条件由多种构件进行的多属性约束 | 轨枕埋入道渣的深度,应为轨枕厚度的1/2~2/3 |
8 | 有前提条件由多种构件进行的多属性约束 | 光面爆破时,周边眼的眼距应控制在0.4~0.6 m |
Tab.3
Standardized framework for building regulations
规范来源 | 前提 条件 | 构件 名称 | 相关 构件 | 构建 属性 | 程度 词 | 比较 词 | 属性值 | 具体描述 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GB50511—2010 | 空 | 检查孔 | 空 | 取心率 | 不宜 | < | 75% | 检查孔取心率不宜小于75% |
现浇混凝 土支护 | 混凝土 | 空 | 塌落度 | 不应 | < | 150 mm | 现浇混凝土支护,混凝土塌落度不应小于150 mm | |
空 | 预注浆 | 空 | 段高 | 宜 | ≥ | 30 m | 工作面预注浆的段高宜为30~50 m | |
空 | 预注浆 | 空 | 段高 | 宜 | ≤ | 50 m | 工作面预注浆的段高宜为30~50 m | |
Ⅱ类岩 层中 | 锚喷临时 支护 | 空 | 段高 | 宜 | ≥ | 50 m | Ⅱ类岩层中锚喷临时支护的段高宜为50~80 m | |
Ⅱ类岩 层中 | 锚喷临时 支护 | 空 | 段高 | 宜 | ≤ | 80 m | Ⅱ类岩层中锚喷临时支护的段高宜为50~80 m | |
空 | 检查孔 终深 | 井筒设计 深度 | 距离 | 宜 | > | 10 m | 检查孔终深宜大于井筒设计深度10 m | |
空 | 轨枕 | 为轨枕 厚度 | 埋入 深度 | 应 | > | 1/2 | 轨枕埋入道渣的深度,应为轨枕厚度的1/2~2/3 | |
空 | 轨枕 | 轨枕 厚度 | 埋入 深度 | 应 | ≤ | 2/3 | 轨枕埋入道渣的深度,应为轨枕厚度的1/2~2/3 | |
GB50215—2015 | 光面爆 破时 | 周边眼 | 其他周 边眼 | 距离 | 宜 | ≥ | 0.4 m | 光面爆破时,周边眼的眼距应控制在0.4~0.6 m |
光面爆 破时 | 周边眼 | 其他周 边眼 | 距离 | 宜 | ≥ | 0.6 m | 光面爆破时,周边眼的眼距应控制在0.4~0.6 m |
[1] |
孙宝东, 张军, 韩一杰, 等. “双碳”目标下统筹能源安全与低碳转型的我国能源系统演化趋势与路径研究[J]. 中国煤炭, 2022, 48(10):1-15.
|
|
|
[2] |
王国法, 杜毅博, 任怀伟, 等. 智能化煤矿顶层设计研究与实践[J]. 煤炭学报, 2020, 45(6):1909-1924.
|
|
|
[3] |
doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102157 |
[4] |
张经阳, 王松江. 煤矿建设项目安全生产系统集成模型研究[J]. 生产力研究, 2011(11):89-92.
|
|
|
[5] |
刘力源, 纪洪广, 王涛, 等. 高渗透压和不对称围压作用下深竖井围岩损伤破裂机理[J]. 工程科学学报, 2020, 42(6):715-722.
|
|
|
[6] |
doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2021.07.032 |
[7] |
肖时瑞. 建筑信息模型技术在土木工程中的运用[J]. 建筑科学, 2021, 37(1):148.
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
doi: 10.1007/BF01276414 |
[10] |
doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(1988)2:3(255) |
[11] |
doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(1998)12:4(181) |
[12] |
doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2010.11.017 |
[13] |
doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2017.10.005 |
[14] |
韩天园, 田顺, 吕凯光, 等. 基于文本挖掘的重特大交通事故成因网络分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(9):150-156.
doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2021.09.021 |
doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2021.09.021 |
|
[15] |
doi: 10.1109/TITS.2015.2472580 |
[16] |
doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104747 |
[17] |
doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.05.044 |
[18] |
谭章禄, 陈孝慈. 基于文本挖掘的煤矿安全隐患管理研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2020, 16(2): 43-48.
|
|
|
[19] |
doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2017.08.021 |
[20] |
doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2021.12.038 |
[21] |
陈丹华, 王艳娜, 周子力, 等. 基于Word2Vec的WordNet词语相似度计算研究[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2022, 58(3):222-229.
doi: 10.3778/j.issn.1002-8331.2009-0090 |
doi: 10.3778/j.issn.1002-8331.2009-0090 |
|
[22] |
doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2015.03.003 |
[23] |
陈远, 张雨, 康虹. 基于知识管理的BIM模型建筑设计合规性自动检查系统研究[J]. 图学学报, 2020, 41(3):490-499.
|
|
[1] | YU Xirui, HE Xu, KONG Depeng. Apriori algorithm-based statistical analysis of hydrogen accidents [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(4): 128-134. |
[2] | YUAN Chenhui, FU Gui, WU Zhirong, ZHAO Jinkun. Comparative study on definition of cause factors between 24Model and LCM [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(1): 27-34. |
[3] | SONG Wei, FU Gui. Comparative analysis study of STPA and 24Model [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(6): 1-10. |
[4] | CHEN Shu, SUN Mengwen, CHEN Yun, NIE Benwu, LI Zhi, LIU Wenzhuo. Causal analysis of construction safety accidents in hydropower projects based on unsupervised LDA [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(10): 79-85. |
[5] | LI Jie, YI Hongyan, LI Naiwen. Investigation on research team and hot topics of accident causation in China [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(7): 20-27. |
[6] | SUN Zhichun, GONG Guangzheng, ZHANG Yanliang, XIAO Haiping, BAI Ling, YAN Weidong. Framework development of power enterprises' accident analysis system based on failure mode [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(S1): 1-7. |
[7] | FU Gui, WU Yali, ZHANG Shijie, YANG Yaodang. Analysis on essential content of hazard [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(11): 1-5. |
[8] | AN Yu, WANG Hui, LI Ziqi, ZHANG Jiangbonan, TONG Ruipeng. Research on formation mechanism of miners' unsafe behaviors based on TPB [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(10): 20-26. |
[9] | GUO Wenya, ZHOU Zhipeng. Subway construction accident causation network modeling and analysis [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(1): 155-161. |
[10] | LI Mo, YAN Fei, NIU Ru, SONG Hanwei, WANG Yanmei, XIANG Nannan. Study on accident causation analysis method based on safety indicator monitoring [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019, 29(S2): 35-40. |
[11] | SUN Shimei, ZHAO Jinkun, FU Gui. Study on behavioral causes of falling accidents based on "2-4" model [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019, 29(8): 23-28. |
[12] | CHENG Lianhua, ZHENG Qing, GUO Huimin, YAN Jin, ZHOU Ruixue. Research on accident process based on cumulative effect [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019, 29(12): 35-39. |
[13] | FU Gui, LI Ya. Research on definition, content and classification of hazards in seven standards [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2017, 27(6): 157-162. |
[14] | LUO Tongyuan, WU Chao. Construction and empirical analysis of accident cause model under SIC thinking [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2017, 27(10): 1-6. |
[15] | FU Gui, XUE Yujingyang, TONG Ruipeng, LI Jizu. A comparison of HFACS and 24Model in categories of unsafe acts [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2017, 27(1): 7-12. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||