Safety inspection ability model of statutory self-inspection personnel in civil aviation

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.07.2773

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to explore the safety inspection ability of statutory self-inspection personnel in civil aviation and improve their capacity-building, the safety inspection ability model of statutory self-inspection personnel in civil aviation was established through the factor analysis of relevant data. Eighteen indicators were selected according to the literature review, relevant regulations and analysis of the statutory self-inspection personnel working mode. The model includes 3 indicators: work core competence, professional work basic knowledge and personal quality concept, and 18 secondary indicators such as the ability to find and eliminate hidden dangers, familiarity with rules and manuals and safety awareness. SEM was used to verify the effectiveness of the safety inspection ability model and determine the influence degree of each indicator on the model. Finally, the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method was used to analyze the model empirically. The results show that the constructed model can objectively and accurately reflect the safety inspection ability of statutory self-inspection personnel, consistent with their actual work performance. The model has certain validity and consistency after verification.

Key words: statutory self-inspection personnel, safety inspection ability, factor analysis, structural equation model(SEM), fuzzy comprehensive evaluation

LI Jingqiang, FAN Tianchen. Safety inspection ability model of statutory self-inspection personnel in civil aviation[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(7): 7-13.

Figures/Tables 9

Tab.1

Tab.2

Tab.3

Tab.4

Rotating component matrix

因子	一级指标	二级指标	因子载荷
1	工作核心能力 $W 1$	发现和消除隐患能力X₁	0.702
		建立自查事项清单X₂	0.713
		沟通协调能力X₃	0.773
		事故分析能力X₄	0.738
		文案写作能力X₅	0.694
		自查案卷归档能力X₆	0.766
		调查取证能力X₇	0.725
2	业务基础知识 $W 2$	制定自查计划X₈	0.727
		规章手册熟悉程度X₉	0.807
		法律法规理解应用X₁₀	0.678
		民航运行综合性知识X₁₁	0.712
		熟悉单位生产流程X₁₂	0.773
3	个人品质观念 $W 3$	自查意愿X₁₃	0.768
		责任心X₁₄	0.791
		检查思路X₁₅	0.826
		公平公正性X₁₆	0.756
		安全意识X₁₇	0.795
		积极主动性X₁₈	0.718

Tab.4

Tab.5

Tab.6

Fig.1

Tab.7

Index weight results

一级指标	权重	二级指标	权重
工作核心能力 $W 1$	0.366	发现和消除隐患能力X₁	0.140
		建立自查事项清单X₂	0.134
		沟通协调能力X₃	0.148
		事故分析能力X₄	0.142
		文案写作能力X₅	0.146
		自查案卷归档能力X₆	0.144
		调查取证能力X₇	0.146
一级指标	权重	二级指标	权重
业务基础知识 $W 2$	0.333	制定自查计划X₈	0.197
		规章手册熟悉程度X₉	0.191
		法律法规理解应用X₁₀	0.194
		民航运行综合性知识X₁₁	0.213
		熟悉单位生产流程X₁₂	0.205
个人品质观念 $W 3$	0.301	自查意愿X₁₃	0.176
		责任心X₁₄	0.166
		检查思路X₁₅	0.168
		公平公正性X₁₆	0.163
		安全意识X₁₇	0.166
		积极主动性X₁₈	0.161

Tab.7

Tab.8

References 16

[1]	高文录, 高扬, 冉岩, 等. 民航法定自查的实践与思考[J]. 民航管理, 2019(2):36-39.
	GAO Wenlu, GAO Yang, RAN Yan, et al. Practice and consideration of civil aviation legal self-examination[J]. Civil Aviation Management, 2019(2):36-39.
[2]	中国民用航空局. 关于在全行业推广行业监管模式调整改革的通知[Z].2017-12-26.
[3]	孙佳, 张禹. 法定自查工作开展成效调研与分析[J]. 民航管理, 2019(11):8-10.
	SUN Jia, ZHANG Yu. Investigation and analysis on the effectiveness of legal self-inspection[J]. Civil Aviation Management, 2019(11):8-10.
[4]	曾波平, 高翔, 李建美. 民航监察员行政执法胜任力模型探讨[J]. 现代商贸工业, 2016, 37(1):95-97.
[5]	姜兰, 杨志东, 孙佳. 航空安全监管专业监察员能力模型研究[J]. 武汉理工大学学报:信息与管理工程版, 2018, 40(3):245-249,255.
	JIANG Lan, YANG Zhidong, SUN Jia. Research on civil aviation safety supervision professional inspector personal ability model[J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology:Information and Management Engineering Edition, 2018, 40(3):245-249,255.
[6]	王永刚, 张凯. 航空公司安全监督人员绩效评价方法研究[J] .中国安全生产科学技术, 2009, 5(4):148-150.
	WANG Yonggang, ZHANG Kai. Method of airline 's safety supervisor performance evaluation[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2009, 5(4):148-150.
[7]	MCLNTYRE G R. System safety training for aviation safety inspectors[C]. 20^th International System Safety Conference. U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), 2002: 95-100.
[8]	WENNER C, WENNER F, DRURY C, et al. Beyond 'hits' and 'misses': evaluating performance on typical inspection tasks of regional airline inspectors[J]. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 1997, 41(1):579-583. doi: 10.1177/1071181397041001128
[9]	王永刚, 张迪, 刘晓璐. 航空安全员安全保障能力评价研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(8):10-16. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2019.08.002
	WANG Yonggang, ZHANG Di, LIU Xiaolu. Study on evaluation of security safeguarding ability of aviation security personnel[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019, 29(8):10-16. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2019.08.002
[10]	李丽, 程久龙. 航空公司从业人员安全诚信影响因素实证研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(2):153-159.
	LI Li, CHENG Jiulong. Empirical study on factors influencing airline employees' safety integrity[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019, 29(2):153-159.
[11]	陈芳, 郭娜, 韩适朔. 民航运营单位安全管理人员胜任力模型实证研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2018, 14(6): 165-170.
	CHEN Fang, GUO Na, HAN Shishuo. Empirical study on competency model of safety management personnel in civil aviation operation organizations[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2018, 14(6):165-170.
[12]	王新. 航空公司安全管理人员素质模型研究[J]. 南京航空航天大学学报:社会科学版, 2014, 16(3):63-68.
	WANG Xin. Study on competency model of safety managers in airlines[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics:Social Sciences, 2014, 16(3):63-68.
[13]	中国民用航空局. 民航行业法定自查容错规范[L].2019-12-23.
[14]	中国民用航空局. 关于民航单位法定自查有关问题的通告(征求意见稿)[Z].2021-11-11.
[15]	中国民用航空局. 民用航空行政检查工作规则[L]. 2016-04-13.
[16]	吴明隆. 结构方程模型:AMOS的操作与应用[M]. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2010:3-23.

KMO值	0.935
Bartlett球形检验	近似卡方	2 126.517
	自由度(df)	153
	显著性概率值(sig.)	0.000

因子	特征值	解释方差/%	累计方差/%
1	8.698	48.322	48.322
2	1.949	10.803	59.152
3	1.451	8.059	67.211

拟合度指标	χ²/df	RMSEA	GFI	AGFI	NFI	CFI	IFI	TLI
理想水平	<3	<0.08	>0.9	>0.9	>0.9	>0.9	>0.9	>0.9
检验值	1.419	0.047	0.909	0.882	0.915	0.973	0.973	0.969