Investigation of safety & security attributes

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.05.0926

Abstract

Abstract:

The words safety & security (simplified as SS) are the most basic terms of SS discipline. Only by clarifying SS characteristics, connotation, extension and development timely can we better understand SS science and study its development law. Therefore, using the methods of historical analysis and logical thinking and reasoning, this paper expounded the dimension and complexity of SS, the specialty and popularity of SS, the ontology and epistemology of SS, the natural and social attributes of SS, and the classification method of SS definitions. Then the nature and characteristics of the discipline of SS science were inferred. The research conclusions are as follows: discussing SS issues requires a common language environment. The SS goes beyond the scope of technological terminology. Since SS is a reflection of human understanding, it is difficult for SS issues research to enter the ontological level. The natural and social characteristics of human beings determine that SS has dual attributes of nature and society, and the eternal nature of contradictions, which leads to the complexity of SS issues and the diversity of its definitions. The paradigm of giving SS definition through "preset + SS" can better express the scope and margin of SS.

Key words: safety & security attributes, dimension, complexity, ontology, epistemology, safety & security definition, safety & security science

WU Chao. Investigation of safety & security attributes[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(5): 1-8.

References 28

[1]	SWUSTE P, VAN GULIJK C, ZWAARD W. Safety metaphors and theories, a review of the occupational safety literature of the US, UK and the Netherlands, till the first part of the 20^th century[J]. Safety Science, 2010, 48 (8): 1000-1018. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2010.01.020
[2]	ULLMAN R H. Redefining security[J]. International Security, 1983, 8(1): 129-159. doi: 10.2307/2538489
[3]	HOLLNAGEL E. Is safety a subject for science?[J]. Safety Science, 2014, 67: 21-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2013.07.025
[4]	AVEN T. What is safety science?[J]. Safety Science, 2014, 67: 15-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2013.07.026
[5]	HAAVIK T K. On the ontology of safety[J]. Safety Science, 2014, 67: 37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2013.09.004
[6]	LE COZE J C. The foundations of safety science[J]. Safety Science, 2014, 67: 1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2014.03.002
[7]	HOPKINS A. Issues in safety science[J]. Safety Science, 2014, 67: 6-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2013.01.007
[8]	ALMKLOV P G, ROSNESS R, STØRKERSEN K. When safety science meets the practitioners: does safety science contribute to the marginalization of practical knowledge?[J]. Safety Science, 2014, 67: 25-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2013.08.025
[9]	DEKKER S, NYCE J. There is safety in power, or power in safety[J]. Safety Science, 2014, 67: 44-49. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2013.10.013
[10]	HALE A. Foundations of safety science: a postscript[J]. Safety Science, 2014, 67: 64-69. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2014.03.001
[11]	BOUSTRAS G, GROTE G, RENIERS G, et al. Safety science new scope[J]. Safety Science, 2020, 121: DOI:10.1016/j.ssci.2019.08.011. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.08.011
[12]	HALE A, MEARNS K, WYBO J L, et al. The future of safety science[J]. Safety Science, 2022, 150: DOI:10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105705. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105705
[13]	安全科学技术百科全书编委会. 安全科学百科全书[M]. 北京: 中国劳动社会保障出版社, 2003: 58:1-521.
[14]	张景林, 王桂吉. 安全的自然属性和社会属性[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2001, 11(5): 6-10.
	ZHANG Jinglin, WANG Guiji. Natural property and social property of safety[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2001, 11(5): 6-10.
[15]	刘潜, 徐德蜀. 安全科学技术也是第一生产力(第三部分)[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 1992, 2(3):1-7.
	LIU Qian, XU Deshu. Safety science and technology is also the first production force (part III)[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 1992, 2(3):1-7.
[16]	曾庆南. 安全概念的定义探析[J]. 安全, 1997, 18(3):40-43.
[17]	尹建华. “安全”概念之缺陷与修正[J]. 经济与社会发展, 2005, 3(8): 32-34,152.
	YIN Jianhua. Defects and correction of the concept of security[J]. Economic and Social Development, 2005, 3(8): 32-34,152.
[18]	刘志军, 刘民权. 人类安全: 概念与内涵[J]. 国际观察, 2006(1): 38-46.
	LIU Zhijun, LIU Minquan. Human security: concept and connotation[J]. International Observation, 2006(1): 38-46.
[19]	朱伟, 刘梦婷. 安全概念再认识:从间接到直接[J]. 风险灾害危机研究, 2017 (1): 10-24.
	ZHU Wei, LIU Mengting. Recognition of safety concept: from indirect to direct[J]. Risk and Disaster Crisis Research, 2017 (1): 10-24.
[20]	吴超, 杨冕, 王秉. 科学层面的安全定义及其内涵、外延与推论[J]. 郑州大学学报:工学版, 2018, 39(3): 1-4, 28.
	WU Chao, YANG Mian, WANG Bing. Safety definition, intension, extension and inferences from scientific view[J]. Journal of Zhengzhou University: Engineering Science, 2018, 39(3): 1-4, 28.
[21]	傅贵, 袁晨辉, 时照, 等. 安全科学名词含义的研究方法及“安全”的含义解析[J]. 安全, 2021, 42(7): 1-4.
	FU Gui, YUAN Chenhui, SHI Zhao, et al. Research methods of safety science terms and analysis of the meaning of "Safety"[J]. Safety & Security, 2021, 42(7): 1-4.
[22]	魏俊杰, 王戈, 刘明举. 安全的定义探析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(6): 13-18. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2019.06.003
	WEI Junjie, WANG Ge, LIU Mingju. Study on concept of safety[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019, 29(6): 13-18. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2019.06.003
[23]	彭鹏. 基于概念的主客观性对安全定义及本质的再认识[J]. 安全, 2020, 41(7): 58-60,65.
	PENG Peng. A new understanding of “safety definition and essence” based on the concept of subjectivity and objectivity[J]. Safety & Security, 2020, 41(7): 58-60,65.
[24]	吴超, 贾楠. 安全人性学内涵及基础原理研究[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2016, 16(6): 153-158.
	WU Chao, JIA Nan. Approach to the connotation of the safety humanology and its basic principles[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2016, 16(6): 153-158.
[25]	库尔曼A德. 安全科学导论[M]. 赵云胜, 魏伴云, 罗云,译. 武汉: 中国地质大学出版社, 1991: 5.
[26]	刘潜. 从劳动保护工作到安全科学(初稿)之二:有关创建安全科学的问题[J]. 劳动保护, 1988(8):31-32.
[27]	张景林, 王晶禹, 黄浩. 安全科学的研究对象与知识体系[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2007, 17(2): 16-21.
	ZHANG Jinglin, WANG Jingyu, HUANG Hao. The object of study of safety science and its knowledge system[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2007, 17(2): 16-21.
[28]	吴超, 杨冕. 安全科学原理及其结构体系研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2012, 22(11):3-10.
	WU Chao, YANG Mian. Study of safety science principles and their constructions[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2012, 22(11): 3-10.