Coal mine safety performance assessment methods based on risk management and control

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.S1.1061

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to effectively improve the safety risk management and control performance of coal mines, according to the risk management and control process from the two aspects of process and result, an assessment index system for safety performance in relation to coal mines was established. Using the G1 method and entropy weight method, combined with the set pair analysis method, a coal mine safety performance assessment model based on the five-element connection number was construct, and a static and dynamic coal mine safety performance evaluation and prediction method were proposed. The results show that the assessment model effectively compensates for the problems existing in the performance assessment of the accident-only theory, which has certain rationality and feasibility. In addition, the method realizes static assessment and dynamic prediction, and proposes corresponding improvement strategies for the assessment results, which is of certain significance for the stable operation of coal mine safety management.

Key words: safety performance, risk management and control, assessment methods, process index, result index

ZANG Chengjun, QU Yuan, GAO Xu. Coal mine safety performance assessment methods based on risk management and control[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(S1): 29-33.

Figures/Tables 3

Fig.1

Tab.1

Tab.2

References 13

[1]	STEMN E, BOFINGER C, CLIFF D, et al. Examining the relationship between safety culture maturity and safety performance of the mining industry[J]. Safety Science, 2019, 113: 345-355. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2018.12.008
[2]	NIETO A, GAO Ye, GRAYSON L, et al. A comparative study of coal mine safety performance indicators in China and the USA[J]. International Journal of Mining and Mineral Engineering, 2014, 5(4): 299-314. doi: 10.1504/IJMME.2014.066578
[3]	陈天祥, 付琳. 政府煤炭安全生产监管绩效评估体系探讨:来自山西省J市的调研[J]. 湘潭大学学报:哲学社会科学版, 2009, 33(5): 18-23.
	CHEN Tianxiang, FU Lin. Research on the performance measurement of governments supervision on the coal mine safety production-a case study of J city in Shanxi province[J]. Journal of Xiangtan University:Philosophy and Social Sciences, 2009, 33 (5): 18-23.
[4]	李然. 煤矿安全规制效果的综合评价研究[D]. 新乡: 河南师范大学, 2014.
	LI Ran. A research on the comprehensive evaluation of the effect of coal mine safety regulation[D]. Xinxiang: Henan Normal University, 2014.
[5]	张淑玲, 王文卿. 基于BP神经网络的煤矿安全绩效评价模型[J]. 煤炭技术, 2017, 36(10): 321-323.
	ZHANG Shuling, WANG Wenqing. Coal mine safety performance evaluation model based on BP neural network[J]. Coal Technology, 2017, 36(10): 321-323.
[6]	王金凤, 刘振锋, 冯立杰, 等. 煤矿安全投入与安全绩效的系统动力学[J]. 辽宁工程技术大学学报:自然科学版, 2011, 30(2): 182-185.
	WANG Jinfeng, LIU Zhenfeng, FENG Lijie, et al. Research on relationship between coal mine safety input and safety performance[J]. Journal of Liaoning Technical University:Natural Science, 2011, 30(2): 182-185.
[7]	成连华, 张良, 李树刚. 基于卓越模式的煤矿安全绩效管理模型体系[J]. 煤矿安全, 2015, 46(10): 239-242.
	CHENG Lianhua, ZHANG Liang, LI Shugang. Management model system of mine safety performance based on outstanding model[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2015, 46(10): 239-242.
[8]	程恋军, 刘敬, 仲维清. 代际视角下组织文化对煤矿安全绩效的影响研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2015, 25(7): 9-15.
	CHENG Lianjun, LIU Jing, ZHONG Weiqing. Research on effect of organizational culture on safety performance from a generational lookout angle[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2015, 25(7): 9-15.
[9]	佟瑞鹏, 王海欣, 王斌, 等. 基于SEM的安全氛围对矿工安全绩效影响[J]. 煤矿安全, 2014, 45(11): 230-232,236.
	TONG Ruipeng, WANG Haixin, WANG Bin, et al. Influence of safety climate on miners safety performance based on SEM[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2014, 45(11): 230-232,236.
[10]	范满长, 程志勇, 王向阳. 煤矿企业管理与安全绩效关系研究[J]. 煤炭工程, 2015, 47(8): 138-140.
	FAN Manchang, CHENG Zhiyong, WANG Xiangyang. Research on the relationship between leadership and safety performance[J]. Coal Engineering, 2015, 47(8): 138-140.
[11]	贺琦, 张金锁, 王萍. 煤矿高层管理者工作压力与安全绩效关系研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(9): 29-35. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2021.09.005
	HE Qi, ZHANG Jinsuo, WANG Ping. Research on relationship between work stress and safety performance of senior managers in coal mines[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(9): 29-35. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2021.09.005
[12]	吕焱, 宋佳婧. 井下一线作业人员工作压力与安全绩效关系研究[J]. 科技促进发展, 2020(3): 309-405.
	LYU Yan, SONG Jiajing. Study on the relationship between work stress and safety performance of front-line operators[J]. Science & Technology for Development, 2020(3): 309-405.
[13]	李红敏, 栗继祖. 基于知识转移视角的煤矿安全培训效果影响因素研究[J]. 煤炭技术, 2021, 40(5): 205-208.
	LI Hongmin, LI Jizu. Research on influencing factors of coal mine safety training effect based on knowledge transfer perspective[J]. Coal Technology, 2021, 40(5): 205-208.

风险因子	风险管控水平
风险因子	毫无效果	效果较差	效果一般	效果显著
重大风险	差	差	较差	良好
较大风险	差	较差	一般	良好
一般风险	较差	较差	一般	优秀
低风险	较差	一般	良好	优秀

一级指标/赋权值		二级指标	Z₁	Z₂	Z₃	Z₄	Z₅	综合权重
过程指标/0.6	技术措施/0.26	矿井通风技术	4	3	3	4	5	0.20
		瓦斯抽采技术	4	2	3	3	4	0.53
		防灭火技术	5	5	4	5	4	0.02
		防治水技术	5	4	4	5	5	0.01
		粉尘防治技术	3	4	4	2	3	0.21
		顶板支护技术	4	3	5	4	4	0.06
	管理措施/0.48	安全投入	4	3	4	5	3	0.07
		安全规章制度	3	4	2	3	4	0.27
		双预控体系	3	3	2	4	3	0.32
		标准化达标	3	2	3	3	3	0.13
		安全文化建设	2	3	3	2	4	0.22
	教育措施/0.26	安全思想教育	4	4	3	5	3	0.62
		安全知识教育	3	5	4	4	4	0.29
		安全技能教育	4	5	5	4	5	0.10
结果指标/0.4	三违行为		3	4	4	5	3	0.34
	安全防护		4	3	4	5	4	0.21
	隐患治理		3	4	3	4	3	0.24
	安全事故		3	4	4	3	4	0.20

[1]	TONG Ruipeng, WANG Biao, SUN Ninghao, HU Xiangyang, WANG Qian. Theoretical construction and application of accident-cause-training method [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(8): 24-29.
[2]	WANG Dan, DONG Ran. Influence of inclusive leadership on employees' safety performance: a moderated chain mediation model [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(1): 18-23.
[3]	XIAO Zhiming, LIU Wen, YANG Jianfang, QIAO Han. Influence of psychological states on train drivers' safety performance [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(S2): 13-18.
[4]	BIAN Binbin, HUANG Yuqing, LIU Zhijian, TIAN Xianmin, ZHANG Kai. Construction of safety evaluation index system based on double prevention mechanism [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(S1): 45-50.
[5]	WEN Dengqin, WANG Fei, SHI Jin, REN Shujing. Safety analysis of train operation in long downhill curve sections of heavy haul railways [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(6): 87-94.
[6]	CHEN Yanlin, HUANG Wenwei, LI Hongyang. Relationship between error management climate and workers' safety performance in construction enterprises [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(5): 28-34.
[7]	SANG Libin, LI Jizu. A cross-level study on influence of team relationship conflict on safety performance of miners [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(2): 51-58.
[8]	HE Qi, ZHANG Jinsuo, WANG Ping. Research on relationship between work stress and safety performance of senior managers in coal mines [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(9): 29-35.
[9]	WANG Yonggang, FANG Chenliang. Research on relationship between pilots' attention distribution ability and their safety performance [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(8): 8-13.
[10]	FENG Yajuan, XING Zhongchao. Research on impacts of destructive leadership on safety performance based on conditional process analysis [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(8): 14-21.
[11]	DING Tianwei, SHEN Yuzhi. Impact mechanism of strengths-based psychological climate on employees' safety performance [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(8): 38-46.
[12]	HAN Tianyuan, LI Xuan, LYU Kaiguang, ZHOU Wencai, LIU Yongtao, QIAO Jie. Safety performance evaluation of dangerous chemicals transport drivers based on vehicle GPS data [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(7): 164-171.
[13]	YI Tao, LI Jizu. Influence of job insecurity on miners' safety performance: based on perspective of intergenerational difference [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(4): 49-56.
[14]	FENG Yajuan, XING Zhongchao. Curve effect of abusive supervision on safety performance: moderating role of trust in leadership [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(11): 1-8.
[15]	NIU Lixia, LIU Yong, LI Naiwen. Analysis on chain intermediary mechanism of mindfulness's influence on safety performance [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(6): 14-22.