Construction of safety evaluation index system based on double prevention mechanism

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.S1.0283

Abstract

Abstract:

Due to its priority on qualitative evaluation, traditional safety performance evaluation system is lacking of accuracy and guidance as well as effective assessment on safety management process. In order to quantitatively assess enterprises' process safety performance, based on theory of dual prevention and present situation of enterprise safety management, risk and hidden danger data generated during dual prevention work process were utilized, their generation and change logic was analyzed, and a set of quantitative evaluation system was created from the data's own connotation, including quantity, category, level and classification, internal quantitative relationship between risks and hidden danger data as well as their correlation. The results show that the proposed safety evaluation system based on dual prevention is conducive to the objective quantitative assessment of enterprises' safety management performance, and can provide a new way for them to evaluate effectiveness of internal safety management work more effectively.

Key words: double prevention, safety evaluation, index system, safety management, safety performance

BIAN Binbin, HUANG Yuqing, LIU Zhijian, TIAN Xianmin, ZHANG Kai. Construction of safety evaluation index system based on double prevention mechanism[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(S1): 45-50.

Figures/Tables 2

References 21

[1]	国务院安委会办公室. 国务院安委会办公室关于印发标本兼治遏制重特大事故工作指南的通知[Z]. 2016-04-29.
[2]	王东照, 翟瑞松. 安全生产双重预防机制的“淮安模式”[J]. 江苏安全生产, 2018(2): 3.
[3]	张新建. 陈四楼煤矿"123456双重预防体系"的建设与应用[J]. 中州煤炭, 2020, 42(2): 14-19,24.
[4]	胡泊. 河南:明确小微企业双重预防体系建设方向[J]. 中国应急管理, 2020167(11): 96.
[5]	王汝凤, 吴雅菊, 任笑薇, 等. 危化企业安全生产标准化分级评价[J]. 化学工程与装备, 2022(3): 244-245, 248.
[6]	伍聂修, 马小明. 基于FAHP的危化品企业安全标准化评价体系研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2012, 8(1): 133-138.
	WU Niexiu, MA Xiaoming. Study on safety standardization evaluation system of chemical enterprise based on fuzzy analytical hierarchy process[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2012, 8(1): 133-138.
[7]	尹一雄. 基于数量化理论的露天矿安全风险评价[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(增1): 86-91.
	YIN Yixiong. Safety risk assessment of open-pit mines based on quantitative theory[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(S1): 86-91.
[8]	阎红巧, 陈怡玥, 田琨, 等. 企业安全生产关键指标体系与风险评价模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(9): 21-28. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2021.09.004
	YAN Hongqiao, CHEN Yiyue, TIAN Kun, et al. Research on key index system and risk evaluation model of enterprise work safety[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(9): 21-28. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2021.09.004
[9]	刘少君, 尚媛, 陈东. 基于等级评价和隐患治理的中车安全管理体系[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(增1): 6-10.
	LIU Shaojun, SHANG Yuan, CHEN Dong. CRRC safety management system based on grade evaluation and hidden danger management[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(S1): 6-10. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.S1.002
[10]	GB/T 33000-2016,企业安全生产标准化基本规范[S].
	GB/T 33000-2016,Guideline of China occupational safety and health management system[S].
[11]	张胜利, 王占平, 陈彦霞, 等. 基于双重预防机制的安全生产标准化体系建设[J]. 现代职业安全, 2020(2): 62-65.
[12]	李晓琴, 王中兴. 双重预防机制与企业原有安全管理体系融合性探究[J]. 安全, 2020, 41(8): 62-65.
	LI Xiaoqin, WANG Zhongxing. Research on the integration of double prevention mechanism and the original safety management system of enterprises[J]. Safety & Security, 2020, 41(8): 62-65.
[13]	MACDONALD D. Practical hazops, trips and alarms[M]. Burlington:Elsevier, 2004: 75-81.
[14]	李硕, 袁颖群. 安全风险与隐患管理对铁路安全影响研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(增2): 99-103.
	LI Shuo, YUAN Yingqun. Study on influence of safety risk and hidden danger management on railway safety[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019, 29(S2): 99-103. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2019.S2.017
[15]	雷长群. 安全生产领域基本概念辨析及双重预防机制研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2017, 13(2): 17-21.
	LEI Changqun. Study on basic concepts discrimination and double prevention mechanism in the field of work safety[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2017, 13(2): 17-21.
[16]	黄典剑. 安全风险分级管控和隐患排查治理双重预防机制建设探讨[J]. 中国安全生产, 2017(7): 36-38.
[17]	国家安全生产监督管理总局. 安全生产事故隐患排查治理暂行规定[L].2007-12-28.
[18]	国家安全生产监督管理总局. 化工和危险化学品生产经营单位重大生产安全事故隐患判定标准[Z].2017-11-13.
[19]	陈全. 事故致因因素和危险源理论分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2009, 19(10): 67-71.
	CHEN Quan. Analysis on accident causation factors and hazard theory[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2009, 19(10): 67-71.
[20]	孙庆刚. 构建风险和隐患双重预防机制的探讨[J]. 中国安全生产, 2017(11): 36-37.
[21]	刘博. 基于双重预防机制化工安全管理创新模式[J]. 技术与创新管理, 2018, 39(4): 469-473.
	LIU Bo. The research of a new chemical safety management mode based on the double prevention mechanism[J]. Technology and Innovation Management, 2018, 39(4): 469-473.

分类	工艺参数、报警及联锁数量^[13] X₁	设备报警数量 X₂	设备备件种类数量 X₃	操作规程所包含操作步骤的数量X₄
工艺系统风险数量Y₁	+	○	○	○
设备设施风险数量Y₂	○	+	+	○
人员操作风险数量Y₃	○	○	○	+
风险总量Y	+	+	+	+