直觉模糊集TOPSIS在边坡地震稳定性评价中的应用

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2017.06.025

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (6): 145-150.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2017.06.025

直觉模糊集TOPSIS在边坡地震稳定性评价中的应用

邬书良^1,2 讲师, 霍亮², 严荣富²

1 东华理工大学江西省数字国土重点实验室,江西南昌 330013
2 东华理工大学地球科学学院,江西南昌 330013

收稿日期:2017-02-17 修回日期:2017-04-25 发布日期:2020-10-16
作者简介:邬书良 (1989—),男,江西南昌人,博士,讲师,主要从事矿业系统工程研究。E-mail:wushuliang@ecit.cn。
基金资助:
东华理工大学江西省数字国土重点实验室开放研究基金资助(DLLJ201706);东华理工大学博士科研启动基金资助(DHBK2016125)。

Application of intuitionistic fuzzy set TOPSIS to evaluation of seismic stability of slopes

WU Shuliang^1,2, HUO Liang², YAN Rongfu²

1 Key Laboratory for Digital Land and Resources of Jiangxi Province,East China University of Technology, Nanchang Jiangxi 330013, China
2 School of Earth Sciences, East China University of Technology, Nanchang Jiangxi 330013, China

Received:2017-02-17 Revised:2017-04-25 Published:2020-10-16

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为准确评价岩土边坡地震稳定性,建立基于直觉模糊集逼近理想解排序(TOPSIS)法的边坡地震稳定性评价模型。首先综合考虑定量与定性指标,选取岩土体特征、新构造运动特性、坡高、坡角、年降水量、场地地震烈度等6个因素为边坡地震稳定性评价指标;然后针对定性指标与指标权重的模糊性,利用直觉模糊集对其进行表示,并结合TOPSIS构建边坡地震稳定性评价模型;最后利用模型对16处边坡地震稳定性进行评价,结果与实际相符。研究结果表明:基于直觉模糊集TOPSIS法的岩土边坡地震稳定性评价模型可用来处理指标权重和定性指标的模糊性,与突变级数法、属性数学、灰色聚类法、综合指标法、模糊因素法等方法相比,用其得到的评价结果更准确。

关键词: 边坡, 地震稳定性, 直觉模糊集, 犹豫度, 逼近理想解排序(TOPSIS)

Abstract: In order to evaluate seismic stability of rock and soil slopes correctly, based on the intuitionistic fuzzy set TOPSIS, an evaluation model for seismic stability of slopes was built. By comprehensive consideration of qualitative and quantitative indicators, six indexes were identified, including the characteristics of the geotechnical body, the characteristics of the neotectonics, slope height, slope angle, the annual average precipitation, and site seismic intensity. For the fuzziness of qualitative indicators and index weights, intuitionistic fuzzy sets were used to represent them. A seismic stability evaluation model of slope was built based on TOPSIS. The model was used to evaluate the seismic stability of 16 slopes. The evaluation results conform with the actual situation. The results show that the evaluation model of seismic stability of rock slope based on intuitionistic fuzzy set TOPSIS can be used to deal with the fuzziness of weights of indexes and qualitative indexes, and evaluation results obtained by using the model are more accurate than those by the catastrophe progression method, the attribute mathematical theory, the grey clustering method, the comprehensive index method, and the fuzzy factors method.

Key words: slopes, seismic stability, intuitionistic fuzzy set, hesitancy degrees, technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution(TOPSIS)

中图分类号:

X913.4

邬书良, 霍亮, 严荣富. 直觉模糊集TOPSIS在边坡地震稳定性评价中的应用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(6): 145-150.

WU Shuliang, HUO Liang, YAN Rongfu. Application of intuitionistic fuzzy set TOPSIS to evaluation of seismic stability of slopes[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2017, 27(6): 145-150.

参考文献

[1] 罗亦泳,张立亭,鲁铁定,等.露天矿边坡变形预测的协同进化多核相关向量机模型[J].中国安全科学学报,2016,26(11):110- 114.
LUO Yiyong, ZHANG Liting, LU Tieding, et al.Forecasting of slope deformation in open-pit mine based on CEPSO-MK-RVM[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2016,26(11):110- 114.
[2] WINES D. A comparison of slope stability analyses in two and three dimensions[J]. Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy,2016, 116(5): 399-406.
[3] ACHARYA K P, BHANDARY N P, DAHAL R K, et al. Seepage and slope stability modelling of rainfall-induced slope failures in topographic hollows[J]. Geomatics Natural Hazards & Risk,2016, 7(2): 721-746.
[4] 刘丽峰,朱明,岳鑫,等.用神经网络分析露天矿边坡稳定性[J].金属矿山,2008(9):38-39,56.
LIU Lifeng, ZHU Ming, YUE Xin, et al. Application of neural network in analyzing open-pit slope stability[J]. Metal Mine, 2008(9): 38-39,56.
[5] 王新民,康虔,秦健春,等.层次分析法-可拓学模型在岩质边坡稳定性安全评价中的应用[J].中南大学学报:自然科学版,2013, 44(6):2 455-2 462.
WANG Xinmin, KANG Qian, QIN Jianchun, et al. Application ofAHP-extenics model to safety evaluation of rock slope stability[J]. Journal of Central South University:Science and Technology, 2013, 44(6): 2 455-2 462.
[6] 王余庆,高艳平,辛鸿博.用灰色聚类方法预测边坡地震稳定性研究[J].工业建筑,2002, 32(6):44-47.
WANG Yuqing, GAO Yanping, XIN Hongbo. A research on prediction of seismic stability of slopes by grey clustering method[J]. Industrial Construction, 2002, 32(6): 44-47.
[7] 方国华,黄显峰.多目标决策理论、方法及其应用[M].北京:科学出版社,2011:55-62.
FANG Guohua, HUANG Xianfeng.Multi-objective decision theory and its application[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2011:55-62.
[8] 李登峰.直觉模糊集决策与对策分析方法[M].北京:国防工业出版社,2012:12-36.
LI Dengfeng. Intuitionistic fuzzy set decision and game analysis methodologies[M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2012:12-36.
[9] 马毅,王希良,刘振,等.基于模糊因素的岩质边坡地震稳定性多模型组合评价[J]. 岩土力学,2011,32(增1):624-629.
MA Yi, WANG Xiliang, LIU Zhen, et al. Multiple model combination evaluation of seismic stability of rock slopes based on fuzzy factors[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2011, 32 (S1): 624- 629.
[10] 文畅平,杨果林.基于属性数学理论的岩土边坡地震稳定性评价[J].中国铁道科学,2010, 31(5):8-14.
WEN Changping, YANG Guolin. The seismic stability evaluation of the rock and soil slope based on the attribute mathematical theory[J]. China Railway Science, 2010, 31(5): 8-14.
[11] 高科,李夕兵,宫凤强.基于突变级数法的边坡地震稳定性综合评价[J].地下空间与工程学报,2009, 5(2):406-411.
GAO Ke, LI Xibing, GONG Fengqiang. Integrative evaluation of seismic stability of slopes based on catastrophe progression method[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2009, 5(2): 406-411.
[12] 邢清华,刘付显.直觉模糊集隶属度与非隶属度函数的确定方法[J].控制与决策,2009, 24(3):393-397.
XING Qinghua, LIU Fuxian. Method of determining membership and nonmembership function in intuitionistic fuzzy sets[J]. Control and Decision, 2009, 24(3): 393-397.

[1]	金洪松, 易富, 戚旭鹏, 于汇泽, 杜常博, 于犇. 加筋尾矿稳定性及界面剪切模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(4): 86-92.
[2]	董建军, 杨嫡, 闫斌, 梅媛. 剧烈干湿交替下高海拔排土场安全稳定性研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(3): 75-83.
[3]	冯巩, 夏元友, 王智德, 严敏嘉. 基于位移信息融合的露天矿边坡动态预警方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(3): 116-122.
[4]	董建军, 梅媛, 李昕, 刘士乙, 闫斌. 高海拔排土场边坡安全稳定性SBAS-InSAR监测^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(1): 92-101.
[5]	唐秋宇, 张锦. 川藏铁路雅林段工程施工质量风险研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(5): 101-107.
[6]	何君毅, 张社荣, 王超, 黄星, 朱罗方. UAV航摄图像融合激光扫描边坡表面位移监测法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(5): 156-162.
[7]	谢博, 施富强, 廖学燕, 马胜, 杨伟, 路祥祥. 边坡位移的EEMD-PSO-ELM模型预测方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(3): 157-162.
[8]	张有洋, 朱昌锋, 韩桴. 异质决策者划分下应急物流路径多准则群决策[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(1): 168-173.
[9]	邬春兰, 宋雨欣, 李晨. 高铁列车客运安全评价及风险管控^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(S1): 150-157.
[10]	吴孟龙, 叶义成, 胡南燕, 姚囝, 江慧敏, 李文. RAGA-PPC云模型在边坡稳定性评价中的应用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(9): 57-63.
[11]	戢晓峰, 李德林, 杨文臣. 山区二级公路交通事故致因的时间演化机制[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(4): 31-36.
[12]	王东, 李广贺, 曹兰柱, 徐晓惠, 张立国. 含顺倾弱层边坡三维稳定性计算方法研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(3): 95-101.
[13]	王春梅, 吕昌伟, 范正日, 程伟. 大型养路机械电气系统的安全设计^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(S2): 84-87.
[14]	王东, 姜聚宇, 刘帅, 韩新平, 曹兰柱, 宋子岭. 露天煤矿边坡相对稳定性判据研究与应用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(7): 76-81.
[15]	张健萍, 周东. 基于概率统计的土石混合体边坡可靠度分析方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(5): 141-146.

直觉模糊集TOPSIS在边坡地震稳定性评价中的应用

Application of intuitionistic fuzzy set TOPSIS to evaluation of seismic stability of slopes

PDF

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价