中国安全科学学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (11): 80-85.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2018.11.013

• 安全工程技术科学 • 上一篇    下一篇

NaHCO3分散状况对其抑制甲烷爆炸的影响研究

王亚磊1,2, 郑立刚**1,2 副教授, 于水军1,2 教授, 李刚1,2, 朱小超1,2   

  1. 1 瓦斯地质与瓦斯治理国家重点实验室培育基地,河南 焦作 454003
    2 煤炭安全生产河南省协同创新中心,河南 焦作 454003
  • 收稿日期:2018-08-07 修回日期:2018-10-07 发布日期:2020-11-25
  • 通讯作者: ** 郑立刚(1979—),男,安徽潜山人,博士,副教授,主要从事可燃气体爆炸动力学及其抑制方面的研究。E-mail:zhengligang97@163.com。
  • 作者简介:王亚磊 (1991—),男,河南新乡人,硕士研究生,研究方向为可燃气体爆炸动力学及粉体抑爆技术。E-mail:2575635245@qq.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助(51674104,51874120);中国博士后基金资助项目(2013M540570);河南省高等学校青年骨干教师资助项目(2012GGJS-053)。

Effect of dispersion condition of NaHCO3 on inhibiting methane-air mixture explosion

WANG Yalei1,2, ZHENG Ligang1,2, YU Shuijun1,2, LI Gang1,2, ZHU Xiaochao1,2   

  1. 1 State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base for Gas Geology and Gas Control, Jiaozuo Henan 454003, China
    2 Collaborative Innovation Center of Coal Safety Production of Henan Province, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo Henan 454003, China
  • Received:2018-08-07 Revised:2018-10-07 Published:2020-11-25

摘要: 喷粉压力和点火延迟时间严重影响着粉体抑爆剂在空间内的分散状况,进而影响粉体抑爆剂的抑爆效果。为探究不同分散状况下粉体抑爆剂的抑爆效果,在自行搭建的5 L试验管道中,结合高速摄像和超压分析开展不同喷粉压力和点火延迟时间下不同质量的NaHCO3抑制甲烷体积分数为9.5%的甲烷-空气混合物爆炸试验。结果表明:评估不同质量粉体的抑爆效果所需的喷粉压力和点火延迟时间不同。管道底部喷粉和点火时,较小或较大的喷粉压力均无法使粉体分散均匀;粉体的总质量越大,所需的喷粉压力越高;在相同的喷粉压力下,总质量较大的粉体分散均匀时所需的时间较长;抑爆效果良好的粉体能使爆炸火焰的传播时间延缓数百毫秒,此时若仍选择粉体分散均匀时点火,火焰传播前期颗粒的沉降反会使管内粉体分散不均。因此,为合理评估不同质量粉体的抑爆效果,应选择粉体即将充满管道时的扬尘上升期作为点火时刻。

关键词: 喷粉压力, 点火延迟时间, 质量, 甲烷, NaHCO3, 抑爆

Abstract: Both the dispersion pressure and ignition delay time have a significant influence on the spatial distribution of the powder inhibitor, thus on the efficiency of explosion inhibition. To study the effect of dispersion condition of given mass of NaHCO3 on inhibiting 9.5% methane-air mixture explosion, a series of experiments were conducted in a self-built 5 L duct having a capability of changing both the dispersion pressure and the ignition delay time. Based on the powder dispersion state visualized by a high-speed camera and the explosion inhibition efficiency, conclusions can be drawn as follows. First, the dispersion pressure and the ignition delay time should be changed with the mass of NaHCO3. An inappropriate dispersion pressure cannot enable the NaHCO3 powder to distribute evenly in the duct. Specially, the larger the mass of NaHCO3 is,the higher the dispersion pressure should be. Moreover, under the same dispersion pressure condition, there is a positive correlation between the ignition delay time required for achieving the even powder dispersion and the mass of the powder. Second, the inhibitor with the excellent efficiency can always prolong the flame propagation time by hundreds of milliseconds. Therefore, the NaHCO3 powder would always be spatially uneven at the initial stage of the flame propagation owing to the gravitational sedimentation, provided that the ignition was activated at the moment when the powder achieved the best spatially-even dispersion. Consequently, to evaluate the efficiency of the inhibitor reasonably when the powder dispersion system and the ignition system are located at the bottom of the duct, the ignition delay time should be chosen during the rising stage of the powder dispersion at which the powder is about to fill fully the duct.

Key words: dispersion pressure, ignition delay time, mass, methane, NaHCO3, explosion suppression

中图分类号: