基于GT-SEM的水陆两栖飞机起降安全风险作用机制

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2019.04.025

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (4): 158-163.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2019.04.025

基于GT-SEM的水陆两栖飞机起降安全风险作用机制

肖琴, 罗帆教授

武汉理工大学管理学院,湖北武汉 430070

收稿日期:2019-01-10 修回日期:2019-03-16 出版日期:2019-04-28 发布日期:2020-11-04
作者简介:肖琴 (1990—),女,湖北孝感人,博士研究生,主要研究方向为风险与应急管理。E-mail:1259012677@qq.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助(71271163),教育部人文社会科学基金资助(18YJA630076)。

Safety risk mechanism of GT-SEM based amphibious seaplane during take-off and landing

XIAO Qin, LUO Fan

School of Management, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan Hubei 430070, China

Received:2019-01-10 Revised:2019-03-16 Online:2019-04-28 Published:2020-11-04

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探究水陆两栖飞机起降安全风险作用机制,有效预防飞机起降安全风险,首先,基于扎根理论(GT),对28个事故统计报告和29位访谈者的访谈记录进行编码,识别两栖飞机起降安全风险因素,构建风险因素概念模型;然后,通过设计调查问卷收集数据,运用因子分析筛选风险因素,并探究风险因素间的相关关系;最后,运用结构方程模型(SEM)揭示风险因素对起降安全的作用路径。结果表明:水陆两栖飞机起降安全风险因素概念模型包括人员、设备设施、环境及管理4大类风险因素及33个具体风险因素项;4大类风险因素间的作用关系及其对起降安全风险的作用路径系数均显著。

关键词: 扎根理论(GT), 水陆两栖飞机, 起降安全, 风险识别, 结构方程模型(SEM)

Abstract: This research is conducted for the purposing of exploring the take-off and landing safety risk mechanism of amphibious seaplanes and effectively preventing such risks. Firstly, the risk factors of take-off and landing of amphibious seaplanes were identified by encoding 28 accident statistical reports and interview records of 29 interviewees on the basis of GT, and then a conceptual model of risk factors was constructed. Secondly, data was collected through questionnaires, factor analysis was used to screen risk factors, and the interrelation between risk factors were explored. Finally, SEM was applied to reveal the function route of risk factors to take-off and landing safety. The results show that the conceptual model of risk factors includes 33 specific factors under 4 categories: personnel, equipment and facilities, environment and management. The 4 categories are obviously interrelated with each other and they have significant influence on the function route coefficients of take-off and landing safety risks.

Key words: grounded theory (GT), amphibious seaplane, take-off and landing safety, risk identification, structural equation model (SEM)

中图分类号:

X949

肖琴, 罗帆. 基于GT-SEM的水陆两栖飞机起降安全风险作用机制[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(4): 158-163.

XIAO Qin, LUO Fan. Safety risk mechanism of GT-SEM based amphibious seaplane during take-off and landing[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019, 29(4): 158-163.

参考文献

[1] LLIOPOULOU C, KEPAPTSOGLOU K, KARLAFTIS M G. Route planning for a seaplane service: the case of the Greek Islands[J]. Computers & Operation Research, 2015, 59: 66-77.
[2] XIAO Qin, LUO Fan. Discussion on the construction problem of civil seadrome[J]. Agro Food Industry Hi-Tech, 2017, 28(3): 3 596-3 599.
[3] 翁建军, 秦雪儿, 李亚攀. 水上飞机起降移动安全区定量计算分析[J]. 中国航海, 2016, 39(3): 87-92.
WENG Jianjun, QIN Xueer, LI Yapan. Quantitative method for establishing moving safety zone around seaplane during taking-off and landing[J]. Navigation of China, 2016, 39(3): 87-92.
[4] 翁建军, 周阳. 水上飞机与船舶碰撞风险因素建模[J]. 中国航海, 2013, 36(3): 70-75.
WENG Jianjun, ZHOU Yang. Analysis of risk factors of seaplane-vessel collision based on the integration of DEMATEL and ISM[J]. Navigation of China, 2013, 36(3): 70-75.
[5] GUO Guoping,XU Yuanchun,WU Bing. Overview of current progress and development of seaplane safety management[C]. IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Engineering, 2016: 58-63.
[6] 张攀科, 罗帆. 水上机场航道冲突风险机制的FTA-BN建模[J].中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(9): 177-182.
ZHANG Panke, LUO Fan. FTA-BN modeling of runway conflict risk mechanism at water aerodrome[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2018, 28(9): 177-182.
[7] 李琰, 于瑾慧. 矿工不安全行为成本和收益因素识别与分析:基于扎根理论的探索性研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(9): 152-157.
LI Yan, YU Jinhui. Miners' unsafe behavior cost and benefit factors recognition and analysis: based on grounded theory[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2017, 27(9): 152-157.
[8] PANDIT N R. The creation of theory: a recent application of the grounded theory method[J]. The Qualitative Report, 1996, 2(4): 4-7.
[9] 杜晓君, 刘赫. 基于扎根理论的中国企业海外并购关键风险的识别研究[J]. 管理评论, 2012, 24(4): 18-27.
DU Xiaojun, LIU He. A grounded-theory-based study on the key risk identification of Chinese enterprises' cross-border M&As[J]. Management Review, 2012, 24(4): 18-27.
[10] 陈劲, 景劲松, 沈祖志. 复杂产品系统创新项目风险作用机理研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2005, 13(S1): 157-164.
CHEN Jin, JING Jinsong, SHEN Zuzhi. A study on mechanism of risk in innovation project of cops[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2005, 13(S1): 157-164.
[11] DOLL W J, XIA Weidong, TORKZADEH G. A confirmatory factor analysis of the end-user computer satisfaction index[J]. MIS Quarterly, 1994,18(4): 453-461.
[12] 吴明隆. 结构方程模型: AMOS 的操作与应用[M]. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2009: 263-305.

[1]	陈彦霖, 黄文炜, 李弘扬. 建筑企业差错管理氛围与工人安全绩效关系[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(5): 28-34.
[2]	戢晓峰, 耿昭师, 普永明, 卢梦媛, 覃文文. 接入道路对山区双车道公路穿村镇路段事故风险影响[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(5): 155-162.
[3]	李妙慧, 栗继祖. 群体动力对矿工不安全行为意向的影响研究^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(7): 48-55.
[4]	于光玉, 李慧民. 旧工业建筑改造施工安全影响机制研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(7): 120-129.
[5]	易涛, 栗继祖. 工作不安全感对矿工安全绩效的影响:基于代际差异视角[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(4): 49-56.
[6]	林晓飞, 林必毅, 宋守信, 喻萧, 沈凡. 地铁乘客火灾应激反应过程模型构建与分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(3): 142-147.
[7]	张磊, 彭金栓, 陈晓利. 驾驶分心行为量表设计与影响因素分析^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(11): 39-46.
[8]	王猛, 刘佳星, 侯雪情, 霍梦华, 邓修权. 高铁沿线突发事件形成机制[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(S1): 179-187.
[9]	叶贵, 李学征, 向卿婷, 越宏哲. 建筑工人故意违章行为动机形成机制研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(8): 12-17.
[10]	王丹, 秦云云. 家长式领导对员工安全行为的影响:心理资本的中介作用和犬儒主义的调节作用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(8): 25-30.
[11]	张建设, 张文宇, 程瑞雅, 罗春阳, 王天星. 安全事故与施工企业网络能力的结构方程模型^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(6): 57-63.
[12]	汤天培, 周溪召, 盛典, 曹阳. 非机动车用户违规骑行意向与事故倾向性研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(6): 128-134.
[13]	安宇, 李建飞, 李虹玮, 祁明辉, 许素睿, 佟瑞鹏. 煤矿安全监管人员工作压力与行为作用机制[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(1): 7-13.
[14]	谢安娜, 尹盼盼, 王志远. 基于SEM的铁路客运安全影响因素分析^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(S2): 30-34.
[15]	张建设, 罗春阳, 程梦元, 赵一帆. 安全事故与施工企业组织文化的结构方程模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(7): 129-136.

基于GT-SEM的水陆两栖飞机起降安全风险作用机制

Safety risk mechanism of GT-SEM based amphibious seaplane during take-off and landing

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价