航空器逆向滑行冲突风险评估模型*

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2021.10.006

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (10): 39-45.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2021.10.006

航空器逆向滑行冲突风险评估模型^*

康瑞¹ 教授, 杨凯^**2,3 助理研究员

1 中国民用航空飞行学院空中交通管理学院,四川广汉 618307;
2 四川大学视觉合成图形图像技术国防重点学科实验室,四川成都 610064;
3 四川大学计算机学院,四川成都 610064

收稿日期:2021-07-05 修回日期:2021-09-06 出版日期:2021-10-28 发布日期:2022-04-28
通讯作者: ** 杨凯(1978—),男,四川成都人,博士,助理研究员,主要从事空管自动化、计算机应用等方面的研究。E-mail:15803928@qq.com。
作者简介:康瑞 (1981—),女,陕西延安人,博士,教授,主要从事空中交通管理、仿真运行等方面的研究。E-mail:kimura521@163.com。
基金资助:
四川省科技厅重点研发项目(2021YFG0171);中国民用航空飞行学院科研面上项目(J2019-031);中国民用航空飞行学院科研重点项目(ZJ2021-05);中国民用航空飞行学院研究生科研创新计划项目(X2020-35)。

Risk assessment model of aircraft opposite taxiing conflict

KANG Rui¹, YANG Kai^2,3

1 School of Air Traffic Management, Civil Aviation Flight University of China, Guanghan Sichuan 618307, China;
2 National Key Laboratory of Fundamental Science on Synthetic Vision, Sichuan University, Chengdu Sichuan 610064, China;
3 College of Computer Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu Sichuan 610064, China

Received:2021-07-05 Revised:2021-09-06 Online:2021-10-28 Published:2022-04-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为保障机场场面运行安全,及时探测逆向冲突行为,构建航空器滑行逆向冲突评估模型。该模型抽象机场场面运行程序和航空器动态滑行过程,综合考虑逆向滑行段长度、喷流范围等要素后定义冲突区域;基于实时速度、距离量化滑行冲突风险,模拟仿真计算,研究表明:该模型可量化评估具有对头运动趋势的匀速、变速滑行的航空器冲突风险,冲突风险值与逆向滑行段长度成正比,与航空器速度、位置差成反比。利用历史滑行轨迹验证,结果表明:该模型能够提前预判冲突趋势,与实际运行情况相符。

关键词: 航空器, 逆向滑行冲突, 风险评估, 机场场面, 模拟仿真

Abstract: In order to ensure safety of airport operation and detect opposite conflict behavior in time, an assessment model of opposite taxiing conflict was proposed. Airport operation procedure and dynamic taxiing process were abstracted, and conflict areas were defined with an integrated consideration of taxi section, jet range and other factors. Then, conflict risks were quantified and simulated based on real-time speed and distance. The results show that this model could quantitatively assess conflict risk of aircraft at both uniform and variable speed with head-to-head motion trend, and its risk value is proportional to length of opposite taxiing section, and inversely proportional to difference of aircraft's velocity and position. It is found that the model can predict conflict trend in advance which proves to be consistent with actual situation.

Key words: aircraft, opposite taxiing conflict, risk assessment, airport operation, simulation

中图分类号:

X949

康瑞, 杨凯. 航空器逆向滑行冲突风险评估模型^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(10): 39-45.

KANG Rui, YANG Kai. Risk assessment model of aircraft opposite taxiing conflict[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(10): 39-45.

参考文献

[1] 罗军.机场管制[M].北京:中国民航出版社,2012:133-143.
[2] 朱新平,汤新民,韩松臣.基于EHPN的A-SMGCS机场滑行道运行控制建模[J].交通运输工程学报, 2010,10(4):103-108.
ZHU Xinping,TANG Xinmin,HAN Songchen.EHPN-based modeling of airport taxiway operation control in A-SMGCS[J].Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2010,10(4):103-108.
[3] 冯兴杰, 岳鹏涛. 基于动态优先级的机场滑行道调度优化算法[J]. 计算机工程与设计, 2016, 37(4):999-1 003.
FENG Xingjie, YUE Pengtao.Optimization algorithm based on dynamic priority for airport taxiway scheduling[J].Computer Engineering and Design, 2016, 37(4):999-1 003.
[4] 刘帆,张学军,马国亮,等.A^*算法的场面滑行动态规划方法[J].空军工程大学学报:自然科学版, 2017, 18(4):19-23.
LIU Fan, ZHANG Xuejun,MA Guoliang, et al.Research on A^* algorithm-based dynamic programming method for airport ground movement[J].Journal of Air Force Engineering University:Natural Science Edition,2017,18(4):19-23.
[5] 张天慈,丁萌,左洪福.基于混合整数规划的机场地面运动扰动恢复[J].北京航空航天大学学报,2018,44(11):2 356-2 363.
ZHANG Tianci, DING Meng, ZUO Hongfu. Airport ground movement disruption recovery via mixed-integer programming[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,2018, 44(11):2 356-2 363.
[6] PIAZZA E. A-SMGCS routing and guidance functions[J]. IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine,2000,15(7): 15-23.
[7] TANG Xinmin, WANG Yuting, HAN Songchen. Aircraft taxi route planning for A-SMGCS based on discrete event dynamic system modeling[C]. Second International Conference on Computer Modeling and Simulation,2010:167-173.
[8] ZHU Xinping,TANG Xinmin,HAN Songchen. Aircraft intersection collision conflict detection and resolution under the control of A-SMGCS[C]. International Conference on Modelling,2012:626-631.
[9] 刘昕,陈平.基于目标感知事件驱动的滑行道交叉口控制方法研究[J].公路,2015(8):176-180.
LIU Xin, CHEN Ping. Research on the method for controlling taxiway intersection based on objective perception events driven model[J].Highway, 2015(8):176-180.
[10] 冯兴杰,杜姗姗.多蚁群协同进化的滑行道调度优化[J]. 计算机工程与设计, 2015(7):1 876-1 880.
FENG Xingjie,DU Shanshan.Multiple ant colony cooperative evolution for optimization of taxiway scheduling[J].Computer Engineering and Design,2015(7):1 876-1 880.
[11] 牟奇锋,冯晓磊.航空器地面滑行碰撞检测方法研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2013,23(12):84-89.
MOU Qifeng FENG Xiaolei.Collision detection technology of taxiing aircrafts[J].China Safety Science Journal,2013,23(12):84-89.
[12] 潘卫军,罗小林,康瑞,等.机场地面交叉口冲突概率估计模型[J].系统仿真学报, 2016, 28(12):2 918-2 924.
PAN Weijun,LUO Xiaolin,KANG Rui,et al. Assessment model of conflict probability at airport surface intersection[J].Journal of System Simulation,2016,28(12):2 918-2 924.
[13] MORI R.Aircraft ground-taxiing model for congested airport using cellular automata[J].IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems,2013,14(1):180-188.
[14] 李楠,强懿耕,孙瑜,等.终端区航空器异常轨迹识别研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2018,28(11):25-31.
LI Nan,QIANG Yigeng,SUN Yu,et al.Research on identification of aircraft abnormal trajectory in terminal area[J].China Safety Science Journal,2018,28(11):25-31.

[1]	刘嘉豪, 余杨, 张振兴, 余建星, 王巍巍, 傅一钦. 二维云模型和贝叶斯网络的立管风险评估方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(5): 147-154.
[2]	辛保泉, 喻健良, 党文义, 白永忠, 于安峰. 定量风险评估视域下的多组分混合物危险特性[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(4): 80-85.
[3]	卢颖, 赵志攀, 姜学鹏, 吴锦东, 范小鹏. 大数据视域下体育场馆动态火灾风险指标研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(4): 155-162.
[4]	黄杰, 张显峰. 以南疆为例的区域暴恐袭击风险评估^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(2): 192-199.
[5]	张鸽. 基于累积接尘量的尘肺病风险评估方法^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(2): 200-206.
[6]	韩鹏, 王军, 王启, 赵嶷飞. 基于飞行剖面的航空器试飞活动空管风险研究^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(1): 149-156.
[7]	刘继川, 桂蕾. 城市公共安全风险评估与控制对策研究:以武汉市为例^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(1): 164-171.
[8]	辛保泉, 党文义, 喻健良, 王溪舸, 闫兴清, 卢卫. 石化过程蒸气云爆炸抗爆设防荷载定量评估方法^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(9): 113-118.
[9]	安宇, 李子琪, 王袆, 郭子萌, 张姜博南. 基于FBN的高校实验室不安全行为风险评估^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(5): 160-167.
[10]	马润, 仇维斌 , 秦云, 欧红香. 模糊区间TOPSIS动车组塞拉门故障风险评估[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(4): 177-183.
[11]	赵冬月, 陈长坤, 易亮. 灾害演化网络时序性风险评估模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(3): 171-177.
[12]	鲁锦涛, 任利成, 戎丹, 郭昕曜. 基于灰色-物元模型的煤矿瓦斯爆炸风险评估[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(2): 99-105.
[13]	韩鹏, 张冰玉. 航迹误差对无人机坠地伤人风险评估的影响[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(2): 106-111.
[14]	刘大山, 陈晓春, 多英全, 师立晨. 化工园区地震Na-Tech事件快速风险评估方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(2): 127-134.
[15]	汪铁楠, 翟越, 王康, 赵瑞峰, 韩树鹏. 新冠肺炎疫情下的高校复课综合风险评估[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(2): 143-148.

航空器逆向滑行冲突风险评估模型^*

Risk assessment model of aircraft opposite taxiing conflict

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价