中国安全科学学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (10): 25-30.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.10.1479

• 安全社会科学与安全管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

风险态度量表的中文版修订及应用

刘晋1(), 沈浩1, 刘卓慧1, 陈思同2, 熊志向3, 潘川3   

  1. 1 重庆科技学院 安全工程学院,重庆 401331
    2 中海油安全技术服务有限公司, 天津 300459
    3 重庆建工集团股份有限公司,重庆 401122
  • 收稿日期:2022-04-16 修回日期:2022-08-17 出版日期:2022-10-28
  • 作者简介:

    刘晋 (1980—),男,辽宁营口人,博士,副教授,主要从事安全心理、应急技术与管理方面的研究。E-mail:

  • 基金资助:
    国家教育部青年基金资助(20YJCZH096); 重庆市教育委员会科学技术研究重点项目(KJZD-K202101501); 重庆市油气生产安全与风险控制重点实验室项目(cqsrc202114); 重庆科技学院研究生科技创新项目(YKJCX2020729)

Revision and application of Chinese version of risk attitude scale

LIU Jin1(), SHEN Hao1, LIU Zhuohui1, CHEN Sitong2, XIONG Zhixiang3, PAN Chuan3   

  1. 1 School of Safety Engineering, Chongqing University of Science and Technology, Chongqing 401331, China
    2 CNOOC Safety Technology Service Co., Ltd., Tianjin 300459, China
    3 Chongqing Construction Engineering Group Co., Ltd., Chongqing 401122, China
  • Received:2022-04-16 Revised:2022-08-17 Published:2022-10-28

摘要:

为测量个体的风险态度,减少不安全行为,修订中文版风险态度量表,讨论在我国文化下该量表的结构;发放250份风险态度调查问卷,回收有效问卷220份,运用SPSS软件分析回收的问卷,并检验其信度和效度。结果表明:修订后的风险态度量表由主动接受风险的态度、趋近接受风险的态度、规避风险的态度、拒绝风险的态度4个因子组成,共32个条目,累计贡献率为75.43%;该量表的Cronbach's α系数为0.796,具有较好的信度;量表的卡方自由度比(CMIN/df)为1.832,增值拟合指数(IFI)为0.905,相对拟合优度指数(CFI)为0.904,均方根残差(RMR)为0.038,近似误差均方根(RMSEA)为0.049,量表结构效度较好;经过专家和相关学者的非结构化访谈,修改和删除部分条目,量表内容效度较好。

关键词: 风险态度量表, 中文版, 信效度, 建筑工人, 因素分析

Abstract:

In order to measure individual risk attitude of and reduce unsafe behavior, the Chinese version of the risk attitude scale was revised to discuss the structure of the scale in Chinese culture. A total of 250 risk attitude questionnaires were distributed and 220 valid questionnaires were collected. The reliability and validity of the questionnaires were analyzed by SPSS software. The results show that the revised risk attitude scale consist of four factors: attitude towards risk acceptance, attitude towards approaching risk acceptance, attitude towards risk avoidance and attitude towards risk rejection. with a total of 32 items, and the cumulative contribution rate is 75.43%. The Cronbach's α coefficient of the scale is 0.796, with good reliability. The chi-square degree of freedom ratio (CMIN/DF) of the scale is 1.832, the increment fitting index (IFI) is 0.905, the comparative fit index (CFI) is 0.904, the root of mean square residual (RMR) is 0.038, and the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) is 0.049, indicating that the scale has good structural validity. Through unstructured interviews with experts and related scholars, some items are modified and deleted, and the content validity of the scale is good.

Key words: risk attitude scale, Chinese version, reliability and validity, construction worker, factor analysis