国家矿山救护队员职业损伤特征与风险因素筛查

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2024.09.0612

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (9): 241-247.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2024.09.0612

国家矿山救护队员职业损伤特征与风险因素筛查

吴放¹^,²(), 李庆¹^,², 杨三军¹^,²^,^**(), 高笛¹^,², 孟昀晨¹^,², 陈强盛³

¹ 中国矿业大学(北京) 体育教研部,北京 100083
² 中国矿业大学(北京) 应急救援工效与防护研究院,北京 100083
³ 国家矿山应急救援大同队,山西大同 037003

收稿日期:2024-03-10 修回日期:2024-06-12 出版日期:2024-09-28
通信作者:
^** 杨三军(1979—),男,湖南湘谭人,博士,教授,硕士生导师,主要从事应急救援与安全管理、特种职业体能与健康防护等方面的研究。E-mail:108947@cumtb.edu。
作者简介:
吴放 (1988—),男,河南开封人,博士,副教授,硕士生导师,主要从事应急救援职业体能与健康防护等方面的研究。E-mail:wufangsport@163.com。
高笛，讲师；
孟昀晨，讲师；
陈强盛，高级工程师
基金资助:
教育部人文社会科学研究项目(22YJC890034); 中央高校基本科研业务费项目(2023SKPYTY02); 晋能控股集团招标项目(SZ202201041)

Occupational injury characteristics and risk factors screening of national mine rescuers

WU Fang¹^,²(), LI Qing¹^,², YANG Sanjun¹^,²^,^**(), GAO Di¹^,², MENG Yunchen¹^,², CHEN Qiangsheng³

¹ Sports Teaching and Research Department,China University of Mining and Technology-Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
² Institute for Emergency Rescue Ergonomics and Protection,China University of Mining and Technology-Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
³ National Mine Emergency Rescue Datong Team, Datong Shanxi 037003, China

Received:2024-03-10 Revised:2024-06-12 Published:2024-09-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为预防国家矿山救护队员的职业损伤,筛查职业损伤的流行病学特征及损伤发生的风险因素。首先,通过实地调研、专家访谈与问卷调查相结合的方式,调查国家矿山应急救援大同队救护队员的损伤情况;然后,通过构建国家矿山救护队员损伤因果关系模型,筛选出矿山救护队员发生职业损伤的风险因素;最后,将所有风险因素代入二元Logistic回归方程进行复筛,确定其关键风险因素。研究结果表明:国家矿山救护队员职业损伤的发生率较高(54.9%),其中,以训练伤为主(80.3%),拉检力器(29.1%)、负重跑(15.2%)为损伤频发的训练项目;损伤部位主要集中在腰(37.2%)、膝关节(11.2%)、手(9.0%)和踝关节(7.6%);劳损(28.7%)、扭伤(25.1%)、拉伤(22.4%)为最常见的损伤类型;影响国家矿山救护队员职业损伤的内部风险因素主要为训练年限,外部因素为饮酒、周训练频率、带伤训练及睡眠不足;准备活动不充分、旧伤复发、错误的技术动作为损伤发生的主要诱导事件。

关键词: 国家矿山救护队员, 职业损伤, 风险因素, 带伤训练, 睡眠不足

Abstract:

To prevent occupational injuries of national mine rescuers, the epidemiological characteristics and risk factors of occupational injuries were investigated. Firstly, the injuries of the rescuers of the National Mine Emergency Rescue Team in Datong were investigated through field study, expert interviews, and questionnaire surveys. Then, a national mine rescuer injury causal model was proposed to determine the occupational injury risk factors. Finally, all risk factors were used in binary Logistic regression equation to determine the key risk factors. The results indicated that occupational injuries occurrence of the national mine rescuers was high (54.9%). Furthermore, training injuries (80.3%), pulling and picking force devices (29.1%), and weighted running (15.2%) were the most common training items for injuries. The waist (37.2%), knee joints (11.2%), hands (9.0%), and ankle joints (7.6%) were the most vulnerable body segments. Work-related injuries (28.7%), sprains (25.1%), and strains (22.4%) were the most common injury types.The major internal risk factors affecting occupational injuries of national mine rescuers were training years, and the external factors were drinking alcohol, weekly training frequency, training with injuries, and lack of sleep. The major inducing events for injuries were insufficiency warm-up, recurrence of old injuries, and incorrect technical movements.

Key words: national mine rescuers, occupational injury, risk factor, training with injury, lack of sleep

中图分类号:

吴放, 李庆, 杨三军, 高笛, 孟昀晨, 陈强盛. 国家矿山救护队员职业损伤特征与风险因素筛查[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34(9): 241-247.

WU Fang, LI Qing, YANG Sanjun, GAO Di, MENG Yunchen, CHEN Qiangsheng. Occupational injury characteristics and risk factors screening of national mine rescuers[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(9): 241-247.

图/表 8

表1

图1

图2

表2

图3

图4

表3

图5

参考文献 17

[1]	国家安全生产应急救援队伍简介[EB/OL]. [2024-01-02]. http://www.nwserc.cn/zydw/dwjj/202309/t20230915_463079.shtml.
[2]	杨三军, 荆亚茹, 姜润发. 矿山救援队应急救援能力评价指标体系构建[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(8): 180-188. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2021.08.025
	YANG Sanjun, JING Yaru, JIANG Runfa. Construction of evaluation index system for emergency rescue capabilities of mine rescue teams[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(8):180-188. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2021.08.025
[3]	焦爱红, 蔡创生. 消防员常训科目训练致伤分析[J]. 消防科学与技术, 2015, 34(3): 379-383.
	JIAO Aihong, CAI Chuangsheng. Injury analysis of firefights normal subject training[J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2015, 34(3): 379-383.
[4]	李小明, 许向辉, 李佳, 等. 矿山救护队员工伤事故分析[J]. 职业卫生与应急救援, 2015, 33(3): 209-210,212.
[5]	MEEUWISSE W H, TYREMAN H, HAGEL B, et al. A dynamic model of etiology in sport injury: the recursive nature of risk and causation[J]. Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine, 2007, 17(3): 215-219. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0b013e3180592a48 pmid: 17513916
[6]	唐桥, 张海忠. FMS和YBT预测中国优秀军事五项运动员损伤发生率的研究[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2019, 45(3): 94-99.
	TANG Qiao, ZHANG Haizhong. Research on the FMS and YBT and the incidence of sports injuries in Chinese elite military pentathlon athletes[J]. Journal of Chengdu Sport University, 2019, 45(3):94-99.
[7]	WALTON S M, CONRAD K M, FURNER S E, et al. Cause, type, and workers' compensation costs of injury to fire fighters[J]. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 2003, 43(4): 454-458. pmid: 12645102
[8]	HEWETT T E, MYER G D, FORD K R, et al. Biomechanical measures of neuromuscular control and valgus loading of the knee predict anterior cruciate ligament injury risk in female athletes: a prospective study[J]. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2017, 33(4): 492-501.
[9]	CONOR P O, LYONS F. Alcohol and the athlete[J]. Sports Medicine, 2000, 29(5): 295-300. pmid: 10840864
[10]	VELLA L D, CAMERON S D. Alcohol, athletic performance and recovery[J]. Nutrients, 2010, 2(8): 781-789. doi: 10.3390/nu2080781 pmid: 22254055
[11]	彭亦良, 杨渝勇, 刘筑, 等. 重庆市武警官兵军事训练伤的流行病学调查[J]. 第三军医大学学报, 2013, 35(22): 2473-2476.
	PENG Yiliang, YANG Yuyong, LIU Zhu, et al. Epidemiological studies of military training injury in Chongqing armed police troop[J]. Journal of Army Medical University, 2013, 35(22):2473-2476.
[12]	CAMPBELL R. U.S. firefighter injuries on the fireground, 2010-2014[J]. Fire Technology, 2017, 54(2): 461-477.
[13]	郭焘, 王祥尧, 顾丹妮, 等. 轮班工人睡眠质量问题及其干预策略[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(增2): 236-242.
	GUO Tao, WANG Xiangyao, GU Danni, et al. Intervention strategies for sleep quality issues of shift workers[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(S2):236-242. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.S2.0203
[14]	BROOKS A, LACK L. A brief afternoon nap following nocturnal sleep restriction: which nap duration is most recuperative?[J]. Sleep, 2006, 29(6): 831-840. doi: 10.1093/sleep/29.6.831 pmid: 16796222
[15]	黎涌明, 李博, 王雄, 等. 赛前准备活动:实践导向的科学证据[J]. 西安体育学院学报, 2022, 39(5): 606-617,632.
	LI Yongming, LI Bo, WANG Xiong, et al. Pre-competition warm-up: practice-oriented scientific evidences[J]. Journal of Xi'an Physical Education University, 2022, 39(5):606-617.
[16]	杨三军, 王昆, 高笛, 等. 应急救援人群高强度功能训练的应用效果与作用机制研究进展[J]. 体育科学, 2023, 43(3): 58-68.
	YANG Sanjun, WANG Kun, GAO Di, et al. The research progress on the effects and action mechanisms of high-intensity functional training on emergency rescue personnel[J]. China Sport Science, 2023, 43(3):58-68.
[17]	魏智丰, 王子朴, 杜承润, 等. 平衡能力训练在下肢运动损伤预防及康复中的应用研究[J]. 中国体育科技, 2022, 58(10): 9-13.
	WEI Zhifeng, WANG Zipu, DU Chengrun, et al. Study on application of balance training in the prevention and rehabilitation of lower limbs sports injury[J]. China Sport Science and Technology, 2022, 58(10):9-13.

变量		p	回归分析结果指标
是否饮酒	否	参考	1.671
是否饮酒	是	0.042	1.671
周训练频率	3次及以下	参考	3.600
周训练频率	4次及以上	0.001	3.600
带伤训练	从不	参考	2.123
	偶尔	0.030	2.123
	经常	0.039	4.581
睡眠不足	从不	参考	10.636
睡眠不足	有时	<0.001	10.636

国家矿山救护队员职业损伤特征与风险因素筛查

Occupational injury characteristics and risk factors screening of national mine rescuers

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 17

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	胡立伟, 贺雨, 侯智, 张瑞杰, 陈琛, 刘冰. 山区高速公路交通事故风险多维度耦合研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34(5): 17-27.
[2]	戢晓峰, 李金, 卢梦媛, 韩春阳, 覃文文. 考虑乡镇集市影响的穿村镇公路事故风险因素辨识[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34(5): 214-222.
[3]	徐孝民, 李伟, 黄胜忠. 黄河流域环境风险因素的时空演变及影响因素分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34(3): 206-215.
[4]	张建设, 黄艳龙, 李瑚均, 陈辉华, 何况, 代姿爽. 基于改进N-K模型的地铁盾构掘进安全风险耦合研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34(2): 67-75.
[5]	王海英, 楚林, 许建. 融合N-K模型的复杂网络架桥机施工安全风险因素分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(9): 10-17.
[6]	李新宏, 付雅倩, 刘亚洲, 韩子月, 张认认. 基于Copula-BN的海上船舶碰撞风险评估方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(9): 204-213.
[7]	王艾迪, 邢莹莹, 张诗雯, 陆键. 基于关联规则的危险品公路运输事故风险因素研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(6): 159-165.
[8]	程明, 梅傲然. 冲偏出跑道事件演化网络构建与分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(12): 77-84.
[9]	赵建伟, 谢磊, 杨洋, 胡昕源, 欧昌奎, 曾荣. 基于ISM-BN的内河船舶航行风险因素研究*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(8): 37-44.
[10]	陈强. 铁路结合部设备配合作业安全风险分析及实践[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(S1): 165-169.
[11]	赵挺生, 庞奇志, 姜雯茜. 基于数据库与支持向量机的施工升降机安全风险预测[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(4): 11-17.
[12]	余建星, 范海昭, 陈海成, 吴世博, 韩放, 刘少卿. 海洋立管失效风险因素分析方法及应用^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(11): 47-53.
[13]	秦帅. 高校社会实践安全风险影响因素研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(1): 18-23.
[14]	魏圆圆, 左忠义, 程伟, 孟子悦. F-ANP法在高速铁路风险评估中的应用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(S1): 165-171.
[15]	陈克嘉, 毛喆, 吴兵, 范莘. 基于互信息的长江船舶碰撞险情等级预测方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(11): 168-175.