Visual analysis of research status and hotspots for driving anger based on mapping knowledge domain

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.07.1977

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to analyze the research status and hotspots in the field of driving anger at home and abroad in recent years, 1 190 papers from the core collection of Web of Science (WOS) database and 230 papers from China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) database were selected as data sources. This paper used bibliometric software of VoSviewer and CiteSpace to generate knowledge mapping.The current status, hotspots and trends of research in the field of driving anger were systematically analyzed in terms of volume distribution, author cooperation and citation, published journals, keyword clustering and emergence, etc. The conclusions are as follows: The amount of relevant literature is increasing, and the international and domestic academic communities are paying more and more attention to the field of driving anger. The cross-unit cooperation in the international academic community is more popular than that in the domestic academic community. Research hotspots in the field of driving anger include driving anger related scales, influencing factor of driving anger, relationship between driving anger and dangerous/aggressive behaviors, driving anger identification and driving anger interventions. Driving performance under anger, driving anger detection systems and driving anger management and control from the perspective of traffic engineering are the future research trends.

Key words: mapping knowledge domain (MKD), driving anger, research hotspots, clustering, visualization analysis

WAN Ping, DENG Xinyan, MA Xiaofeng. Visual analysis of research status and hotspots for driving anger based on mapping knowledge domain[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(7): 39-50.

Figures/Tables 12

Fig.1

Fig.2

Tab.1

Fig.3

Tab.2

Fig.4

Tab.3

Fig.5

Tab.4

Fig.6

Fig.7

Fig.8

References 60

[1]	DAHLEN E R, MARTIN R C, RAGAN K, et al. Driving anger, sensation seeking, impulsiveness, and boredom proneness in the prediction of unsafe driving[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2005, 37(2): 341-348. pmid: 15667821
[2]	60%车主有路怒症:多起因违章[EB/OL].(2008-05-13). http://auto.sohu.com/20080513/n256816082.shtml.
[3]	吴超仲, 雷虎. 汽车驾驶愤怒情绪研究现状与展望[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2010, 20(7): 3-8.
	WU Chaozhong, LEI Hu. Review on the study of motorists' driving anger[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2010, 20(7): 3-8.
[4]	冯忠祥, 雷叶维, 张卫华, 等. 汽车驾驶愤怒研究进展[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2016, 26(1): 15-21.
	FENG Zhongxiang, LEI Yewei, ZHANG Weihua, et al. Progress in research on motorists' driving anger[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2016, 26(1): 15-21.
[5]	DEFFENBACHER J L, STEPHENS A N, SULLMAN M J M. Driving anger as a psychological construct: twenty years of research using the driving anger scale[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2016, 42: 236-247. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2015.10.021
[6]	DEFFENBACHER J L. A review of interventions for the reduction of driving anger[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2016, 42: 411-421. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2015.10.024
[7]	BOGDAN S R, MǍIREAN C, HAVâRNEANU C E. A meta-analysis of the association between anger and aggressive driving[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2016, 42: 350-364. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2016.05.009
[8]	ZHANG Tingru, CHAN A H. The association between driving anger and driving outcomes: a meta-analysis of evidence from the past twenty years[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2016, 90: 50-62. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.02.009
[9]	DEMIR B, DEMIR S, ÖZKAN T. A contextual model of driving anger: a meta-analysis[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2016, 42: 332-349. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2016.09.020
[10]	成都女司机被打真实原因揭秘:都是路怒症惹的祸[EB/OL].(2015-05-06). http://life.365jilin.com/html/2134256.shtml.
[11]	预防路怒症避免北京房山车祸事件重演[EB/OL].(2015-07-06). http://www.rmzxb.com.cn/c/2015-07-06/528560.shtml.
[12]	李凤芝, 李昌吉, 詹承烈, 等. 攻击性驾驶行为量表中文译本的效度和信度[J]. 中国行为医学科学, 2003, 12(3): 335-337.
	LI Fengzhi, LI Changji, ZHAN Chenglie, et al. The reliability and validity of aggressive driving questionnaires in Chinese version[J]. Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medical Science, 2003, 12(3): 335-337.
[13]	DEFFENBACHER J L, OETTING E R, LYNCH R S. Development of a driving anger scale[J]. Psychological Reports, 1994, 74(1): 83-91. pmid: 8153239
[14]	BJöRKLUND G M. Driver irritation and aggressive behaviour[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2008, 40(3): 1069-1077. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2007.10.014 pmid: 18460375
[15]	林庆丰, 邓院昌, 张圆, 等. 公交驾驶员驾驶愤怒量表的编制及初步应用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(6): 49-54. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2018.06.009
	LIN Qingfeng, DENG Yuanchang, ZHANG Yuan, et al. Development of driving anger scale for bus drivers and its preliminary application[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2018, 28(6): 49-54. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2018.06.009
[16]	SULLMAN M J. Anger amongst New Zealand drivers[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2006, 9(3): 173-184. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2005.10.003
[17]	YASAK Y, ESIYOK B. Anger amongst Turkish drivers: driving anger scale and its adapted, long and short version[J]. Safety Science, 2009, 47(1): 138-144. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2008.02.003
[18]	DEFFENBACHER J L, LYNCH R S, OETTING E R, et al. The driving anger expression inventory: a measure of how people express their anger on the road[J]. Behaviour Research Therapy, 2002, 40(6): 717-737. doi: 10.1016/S0005-7967(01)00063-8
[19]	HERRERO-FERNáNDEZ D. Psychometric adaptation of the driving anger expression inventory in a Spanish sample: differences by age and gender[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2011, 14(4): 324-329. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2011.03.001
[20]	SULLMAN M, STEPHENS A N, YONG M. Anger, aggression and road rage behaviour in Malaysian drivers[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2015, 29: 70-82. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2015.01.006
[21]	STEPHENS A N, SULLMAN M J. Development of a short form of the driving anger expression inventory[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2014, 72: 169-176. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.06.021
[22]	GE Yan, QU Weina, ZHANG Qian, et al. Psychometric adaptation of the driving anger expression inventory in a Chinese sample[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2015, 33: 75-86. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2015.07.008
[23]	DEPASQUALE J P, GELLER E S, CLARKE S W, et al. Measuring road rage: development of the propensity for angry driving scale[J]. Journal of Safety Research, 2001, 32(1): 1-16. doi: 10.1016/S0022-4375(00)00050-5
[24]	MAXWELL J P, GRANT S, LIPKIN S. Further validation of the propensity for angry driving scale in British drivers[J]. Personality and Individual Differences, 2005, 38(1): 213-224. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2004.04.002
[25]	LEAL N L, PACHANA N A. Validation of the Australian propensity for angry driving scale (Aus-PADS)[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2009, 41(5): 1112-1117. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.06.023
[26]	PAUL B H, JOHN M H, JOSE A V, et al. The prosocial and aggressive driving inventory (PADI): a self-report measure of safe and unsafe driving behaviors[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2014, 72:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.05.023
[27]	GE Yan, QU Weina, JIANG Caihong, et al. The effect of stress and personality on dangerous driving behavior among Chinese drivers[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2014, 73: 34-40. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.07.024
[28]	LI Feng, WANG Guangxi, LI Yongjuan, et al. Job demands and driving anger: the roles of emotional exhaustion and work engagement[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2017, 98: 198-205. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.10.013
[29]	FIERRO I, MORALES C, ALVAREZ F J. Alcohol use, illicit drug use, and road rage[J]. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 2011, 72(2): 185-193. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2011.72.185
[30]	TECHER F, OJEDA L, BARAT D, et al. Anger and highly automated driving in urban areas: the role of time pressure[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2019, 64: 353-360. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2019.05.016
[31]	ROSEBOROUGH J E, WIESENTHAL D L. Roadway justice-making angry drivers, happy drivers[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2014, 24: 1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2014.02.002
[32]	GONZáLEZ-IGLESIAS B, GÓMEZ-FRAGUELA J A, LUENGO-MARTíN M Á. Driving anger and traffic violations: gender differences[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2012, 15(4): 404-412. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2012.03.002
[33]	LAJUNEN T, PARKER D. Are aggressive people aggressive drivers? a study of the relationship between self-reported general aggressiveness, driver anger and aggressive driving[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2001, 33(2): 243-255. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(00)00039-7 pmid: 11204896
[34]	FENG Zhongxiang, LEI Yewei, LIU Hongchao, et al. Driving anger in China: a case study on professional drivers[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2016, 42: 255-266. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2016.09.023
[35]	冯忠祥, 刘静, 李阳阳, 等. 攻击性驾驶行为选择模型及影响因素敏感度分析[J]. 中国公路学报, 2012, 25(2): 106-112.
	FENG Zhongxiang, LIU Jing, LI Yangyang, et al. Selected model and sensitivity analysis of aggressive driving behavior[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2012, 25(2): 106-112.
[36]	HERRERO-FERNáNDEZ D. Psychophysiological, subjective and behavioral differences between high and low anger drivers in a simulation task[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2016, 42: 365-375. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2015.12.015
[37]	ZHANG Tingru, CHAN A H, BA Yutao, et al. Situational driving anger, driving performance and allocation of visual attention[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2016, 42: 376-388. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2015.05.008
[38]	钟铭恩, 洪汉池, 袁志群. 愤怒情绪对驾驶行为影响的实验[J]. 重庆理工大学学报:自然科学, 2011, 25(10): 6-11.
	ZHONG Ming'en, HONG Hanchi, YUAN Zhiqun. Experiment research on influence of angry emotion for driving behaviors[J]. Journal of Chongqing University of Technology:Natural Science, 2011, 25(10): 6-11.
[39]	ABDU R, SHINAR D, MEIRAN N. Situational (state) anger and driving[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2012, 15(5): 575-580. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2012.05.007
[40]	PRECHT L, KEINATH A, KREMS J F. Effects of driving anger on driver behavior-results from naturalistic driving data[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2017, 45: 75-92. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2016.10.019
[41]	BACHOO S, BHAGWANJEE A, GOVENDER K. The influence of anger, impulsivity, sensation seeking and driver attitudes on risky driving behaviour among post-graduate university students in Durban, South Africa[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2013, 55(1): 67-76. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.02.021
[42]	ZHANG Tingru, CHAN A H, XUE Hongjun, et al. Driving anger, aberrant driving behaviors, and road crash risk: testing of a mediated model[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2019, 16(3):DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16030297 doi: 10.3390/ijerph16030297
[43]	ROIDL E, SIEBERT F W, OEHL M, et al. Introducing a multivariate model for predicting driving performance: the role of driving anger and personal characteristics[J]. Journal of Safety Research, 2013, 47: 47-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2013.08.002 pmid: 24237870
[44]	DANAF M, ABOU-ZEID M, KAYSI I. Modeling anger and aggressive driving behavior in a dynamic choice-latent variable model[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2015, 75: 105-118. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.11.012
[45]	PASCHERO M, VESCOVO G D, BENUCCI L, et al. A real time classifier for emotion and stress recognition in a vehicle driver[C]. 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics, 2012: 1690-1695.
[46]	李尚卿, 王晓原, 张杨, 等. 基于改进MFCC融合特征及FA-PNN的驾驶员路怒情绪识别[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2023, 59(2):306-313. doi: 10.3778/j.issn.1002-8331.2108-0080
	LI Shangqing, WANG Xiaoyuan, ZHANG Yang, et al. Road rage recognition based on improved MFCC fusion feature and FA-PNN[J]. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2023, 59(2):306-313. doi: 10.3778/j.issn.1002-8331.2108-0080
[47]	KATSIS C, GOLETSIS Y, RIGAS G, et al. A wearable system for the affective monitoring of car racing drivers during simulated conditions[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2011, 19(3): 541-551. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2010.09.004
[48]	WAN Ping, WU Chaozhong, LIN Yinzi, et al. On-road experimental study on driving anger identification model based on physiological features by ROC curve analysis[J]. IET Intelligent Transport Systems, 2017, 11(5): 290-298. doi: 10.1049/itr2.v11.5
[49]	万平, 吴超仲, 林英姿, 等. 基于置信规则库的驾驶人愤怒情绪识别模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2015, 15(5): 96-102.
	WAN Ping, WU Chaozhong, LIN Yingzi, et al. A recognition model of driving anger based on belief rule base[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2015, 15(5): 96-102.
[50]	CARMONA J, GARCíA F, MARTíN D, et al. Data fusion for driver behaviour analysis[J]. Sensors, 2015, 15(10): 25 968-25 991. doi: 10.3390/s151025968
[51]	万平, 吴超仲, 马晓凤. 基于ROC曲线和驾驶行为特征的驾驶愤怒强度判别阈值[J]. 吉林大学学报:工学版, 2020, 50(1): 121-131.
	WAN Ping, WU Chaozhong, MA Xiaofeng. Discriminating threshold of driving anger intensity based on driving behavior features by ROC curve analysis[J]. Journal of Jilin University:Engineering and Technology Edition, 2020, 50(1): 121-131.
[52]	万平, 吴超仲, 林英姿, 等. 基于驾驶行为多元时间序列特征的愤怒驾驶状态检测[J]. 吉林大学学报:工学版, 2017, 47(5): 1426-1435.
	WAN Ping, WU Chaozhong, LIN Yingzi, et al. Driving anger detection based on multivariate time series features of driving behavior[J]. Journal of Jilin University:Engineering and Technology Edition, 2017, 47(5): 1426-1435.
[53]	WU Chenjian, HUANG Chengwei, CHEN Hong. Automatic recognition of emotions and actions in bi-modal video analysis[C]. Internet of Vehicles-Safe and Intelligent Mobility: Second International Conference, 2015: 427-438.
[54]	WAN Ping, WU Chaozhong, LIN Yingzi, et al. Driving anger states detection based on incremental association markov blanket and least square support vector machine[J]. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2019, 3:1-17. doi: 10.1155/S1026022699000011
[55]	GALOVSKI T E, BLANCHARD E B, MALTA L S, et al. The psychophsiology of aggressive drivers: comparison to non-aggressive drivers and pre-to post-treatment change following a cognitive-behavioural treatment[J]. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 2003, 41(9): 1055-1067. doi: 10.1016/S0005-7967(02)00242-5
[56]	DEFFENBACHER J L, HUFF M E, LYNCH R S, et al. Characteristics and treatment of high-anger drivers[J]. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 2000, 47(1): 5-17. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.47.1.5
[57]	KAZEMEINI T, GHANBARI-E-HASHEM-ABADI B, SAFARZADEH A. Mindfulness based cognitive group therapy vs cognitive behavioral group therapy as a treatment for driving anger and aggression in Iranian taxi drivers[J]. Psychology, 2013, 4(8): 638-644. doi: 10.4236/psych.2013.48091
[58]	FENG Zhongxiang, ZHAN Jingjing, MA Changxi, et al. Is cognitive intervention or forgiveness intervention more effective for the reduction of driving anger in Chinese bus drivers?[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2018, 55: 101-113. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2018.02.039
[59]	DEFFENBACHER J L, OETTING E R, DIGIUSEPPE R A. Principles of empirically supported interventions applied to anger management[J]. The Counseling Psychologist, 2002, 30(2): 262-280. doi: 10.1177/0011000002302004
[60]	沈世琴. 高原汽车兵驾驶愤怒与驾驶攻击的影响因素及心理干预研究[D]. 上海: 华东师范大学, 2013.
	SHEN Shiqin. The associated factors and psychological intervention of driving anger and aggression for plateau military truck drivers[D]. Shanghai: East China Normal University, 2013.

序号	作者	机构	中心性		发文量		被引量		序号		作者		机构	发文量	被引量
1	常若松	辽宁师范大学心理学院	0.01		9		48		9		张卫华		合肥工业大学汽车与交通工程学院	3	64
2	吴超仲	武汉理工大学ITS中心	0		8		159		10		王雪松		同济大学交通运输工程学院	3	13
3	孙龙	辽宁师范大学心理学院	0		7		28		11		万平		华东交通大学交通运输工程学院	3	38
4	郭双	大连海洋大学马克思主义学院	0		5		57		12		李凤芝		四川大学华西公共卫生学院	3	110
5	马晓凤	武汉理工大学ITS中心	0		5		89		13		张敬磊		山东理工大学交通与车辆工程学院	3	12
6	马锦飞	辽宁师范大学心理学院	0	4		8		14		龙云芳		四川大学华西公共卫生学院		3	110
7	李昌吉	四川大学华西公共卫生学院	0	4		160		15		詹承烈		四川大学华西公共卫生学院		3	110
8	冯忠祥	合肥工业大学汽车与交通工程学院	0	3		64		16		李瑞瑞		同济大学交通运输工程学院		3	13

序号	作者	被引量	连接强度	序号	作者	被引量	连接强度
1	DEFFENBACHER	1 567	1 100	9	WIESENTHAL	390	122
2	LYNCH	1 362	919	10	GE Yan	361	503
3	LAJUNEN	1 150	430	11	TAUBMAN	333	140
4	OETTING	1 072	700	12	MANN	301	279
5	STEPHENS	737	1 071	13	ZHANG Tingru	282	295
6	SULLMAN	714	1 002	14	WICKENS	271	329
7	OZKAN	608	199	15	LUCIDI	256	69
8	QU Weina	435	533	16	GROEGER	255	278

序号	期刊(简写)	发文量	被引	强度	序号	期刊(简写)	发文量	被引	强度
1	Transport Res F-Traf	192	3 827	2 092	9	J Appl Psychol	14	849	306
2	Accident Anal Prev	167	7 085	2 061	10	Safety Sci	14	503	201
3	Traffic Inj Prev	31	323	254	11	IEEE T Intell Transp	11	300	10
4	Transport Res Rec	30	281	49	12	J Transp Saf Secur	11	64	85
5	J Safety Res	24	930	389	13	Transport Res C-Emer	10	356	42
6	Pers Indiv Differ	17	1 010	477	14	Aggressive Behav	9	516	210
7	Int J Env Res Pub He	15	169	132	15	Behavior Research and Therapy	9	810	389
8	J Adv Transport	14	165	47	16	Transport Res A-Pol	9	345	6