振弦栅与高压喷雾协同作用下除尘特性研究*

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2021.06.014

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (6): 106-112.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2021.06.014

振弦栅与高压喷雾协同作用下除尘特性研究^*

丁厚成¹ 副教授, 连志虚¹, 邓权龙¹, 蒋仲安² 教授, 杨利炜¹, 葛梦圆¹

1 安徽工业大学建筑工程学院,安徽马鞍山 243002;
2 北京科技大学土木与资源工程学院,北京 100083

收稿日期:2021-03-05 修回日期:2021-05-08 出版日期:2021-06-28
作者简介:丁厚成 (1973—),男,安徽来安人,博士,副教授,主要从事安全技术及工程等方面的研究。E-mail: hnhoucheng@163.com。
基金资助:
安徽省自然科学基金资助(1808085ME161);安徽高校自然科学研究项目(KJ2019A0052);大学生创新创业项目(202010360043,S201910360232)。

Research on dust removal characteristics under synergistic action of vibrating wire grid and high-pressure spray

DING Houcheng¹, LIAN Zhixu¹, DENG Quanlong¹, JIANG Zhongan², YANG Liwei¹, GE Mengyuan¹

1 School of Construction Engineering, Anhui University of Technology, Ma'anshan,Anhui 243002, China;
2 School of Civil and Resource Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing,Beijing 100083, China

Received:2021-03-05 Revised:2021-05-08 Published:2021-06-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为防治矿井排风口的粉尘对矿区周边大气环境的污染问题,基于流体动力学、气液耦合和喷雾降尘及振弦栅除尘理论,运用计算流体动力学(CFD)三维数值模拟方法,优化振弦栅与高压喷雾协同作用下除尘特性参数,研究不同雾化压力对雾滴粒径分布及质量浓度分布的影响,分析振弦栅直径及间距对雾滴拦截效果、风速对双层振弦栅水膜作用特征。结果表明:随着雾化压力增大,雾滴粒径逐渐变小且分布集中化,雾化压力超过8 MPa后雾滴粒径分布变化不明显;不同间距的振弦栅均对流场有截流作用并伴有严重回流现象,而间距为5 mm的振弦栅对粒径较小的雾滴拦截效果更好;当进口风速为3 m/s时振弦栅表面形成水膜效果最佳,更利于粉尘捕集;模拟数据与试验结果变化趋势基本一致。

关键词: 振弦栅, 雾化压力, 协同作用, 湿式除尘, 数值模拟

Abstract: In order to prevent and control pollution of dust from outlet of mine to surrounding atmospheric environment of mining area,based on theory of fluid dynamics, gas-liquid coupling and spray dust reduction and vibrating wire grid dust removal, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) three-dimensional numerical simulation method was used, dust removal characteristic parameters under synergistic effect of vibrating wire grid and high-pressure spray were optimized, effects of different atomization pressures on particle size distribution and mass concentration distribution of droplets were studied. Effects of diameter and spacing of vibrating string grid on droplets intercepting effect and effects of wind speed on water film of double-layer vibrating string grid were analyzed. The results show that with the increase of atomization pressure, the particle size of droplets decreases gradually and distribution becomes centralized. When atomization pressure exceeds 8 MPa, particle size distribution of droplets does not change significantly. Vibrating-string grids with different spacing have effect of blocking flow field and serious backflow phenomenon, while vibrating-string grids with spacing of 5 mm have the better effect of intercepting droplets with smaller particle size.When inlet wind speed is 3 m/s, water film on the surface of vibrating grating has the best effect, which is more conducive to dust collection. Variation trend of simulated data is basically consistent with experimental results.

Key words: vibrating wire grid, atomization pressure, synergistic action, wet dust removal, numerical simulation

中图分类号:

X964

丁厚成, 连志虚, 邓权龙, 蒋仲安, 杨利炜, 葛梦圆. 振弦栅与高压喷雾协同作用下除尘特性研究^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(6): 106-112.

DING Houcheng, LIAN Zhixu, DENG Quanlong, JIANG Zhongan, YANG Liwei, GE Mengyuan. Research on dust removal characteristics under synergistic action of vibrating wire grid and high-pressure spray[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(6): 106-112.

参考文献

[1] CHEN Dawei, NIE Wen, CAI Peng, et al. The diffusion of dust in a fully-mechanized mining face with a mining height of 7 m and the application of wet dust-collecting nets[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018,20(5):463-476.
[2] WANG Pengfei, FENG Tao, LIU Ronghua.Numerical simulation study on the dust distribution of full-mechanized face under the isolation effect of air curtain[J]. Mining Science and Technology, 2011,21(1):65-79.
[3] 林大建, 马文博, 黎良飞,等. 振弦栅的结构参数对净化流场影响的模拟[J]. 江西理工大学学报, 2020,41(1):64-70.
LIN Dajian, MA Wenbo, LI Liangfei, et al. Simulation study on the influence of structural parameters of vibrating wire grid on purification flow field[J]. Journal of Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, 2020,41(1):64-70.
[4] 邹明, 陈祖云, 饶贞标,等. 不同喷雾方式下低阻文丘里振弦栅除尘配置优化实验研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术, 2020,16(2):161-167.
ZOU Ming, CHEN Zuyun, RAO Zhenbiao, et al. Expermental study on optimization of dust removal configuration for low-resistance venture fiber grid under different spraying modes[J]. China Safety Production Science and Technology, 2020,16(2):161-167.
[5] TENG Chenzi, LI Jian. Experimental study on particle removal of a wet electrostatic precipitator with atomization of charged water drops[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2020(34):7257-7268.PH.
[6] 蒋仲安, 王亚朋, 许峰. 金属矿山气-水喷头雾化特性及降尘能力实验研究[J]. 中南大学学报:自然科学版, 2020,51(1):184-192.
JIANG Zhongan, WANG Yapeng, XU Feng. Experimental study on atomization characterstics and dust reduction capacity of gas-water nozzles in metal mines[J]. Journal of Central South University:Science and Technology, 2020, 51(1):184-192.
[7] 陈景序, 荆德吉, 葛少成. 气动涡旋雾幕性能影响因素试验及优化研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019,29(7):123-128.
CHEN Jingxu, JING Deji, GE Shaocheng. Experimental study on factors influencing performance of pneumatic vortex spray curtain and its optimization[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019,29(7):123-128.
[8] XU Donghai, HUANG Chuanbao, WANG Shuzhong. Characteristics analysis of water film in transpiring wall reactor[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2016,100:559-565.
[9] WANG Bo, TIAN Ruifeng. Investigation on flow and breakdown characteristics of water film onvertical corrugated plate wall[J]. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2019,127:120-129.
[10] BABA S, KELES I. A novel approach to forced vibration behavior of thick-walled cylinders[J]. International Journal of Pressure Vessels & Piping, 2016,137:22-27.
[11] 吴志荣. 矿井湿式共振弦栅过滤除尘器研究及应用[D]. 湘潭:湖南科技大学, 2019.
WU Zhirong. Research and application of mine wet resonant chord filter dust collector[D]. Xiangtan: Hunan University of Science and Technology, 2019.
[12] 柳承徽, 陈先锋, 张威,等. 基于PIV的气动式细水雾流场研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020,30(7):120-126.
LIU Chenghui, CHEN Xianfeng, ZHANG Wei, et al. Research on pneumatic water mist flow field based on PIV[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020,30(7):120-126.
[13] LI Peng, ZHANG Xuhui, LU Xiaobing. Three-dimensional Eulerian modeling of gas-liquid-solid flow with gas hydrate dissociation in a vertical pipe[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2019,196:145-165.
[14] 王宝晴, 张超, 刘建. 不同风速下巷道断面微细粉尘分布模拟试验研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018,28(3):44-49.
WANG Baoqing, ZHANG Chao, LIU Jian. Simulation experimental study on fine dust distribution over roadway section under different wind speeds[J]. China Ssfety Science Journal, 2018,28(3):44-49.
[15] VIJAYA R, MURTHY V R. Analysis of stresses produced and dust generation during rock cutting by ANSYS software[J]. International Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2014,5(3):143-189.

振弦栅与高压喷雾协同作用下除尘特性研究^*

Research on dust removal characteristics under synergistic action of vibrating wire grid and high-pressure spray

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张颖, 黄国洪, 龙雨娇. 高层建筑不同外保温立面结构火蔓延模拟研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34(5): 122-128.
[2]	刘恩斌, 李茜, 寇博, 姜军, 李党建. 页岩气分离器阀套式排污阀冲蚀特性研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34(5): 52-60.
[3]	何文, 卢博凯, 石文芳, 祝思雨, 刘金朋. 超声空化效应对细粒尾矿的增渗作用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34(5): 91-100.
[4]	夏勇, 安瑞楠, 张伟锋, 张超, 何坤, 林鹏. 高海拔长大水工隧洞群挡烟垂壁控烟机制[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34(4): 58-66.
[5]	彭善碧, 罗雪. 埋地掺氢天然气管道泄漏扩散数值模拟研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34(3): 63-69.
[6]	段继超, 宗琦, 汪海波, 王浩. 起爆顺序对台阶岩石破碎块度及爆破振动影响研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34(2): 192-199.
[7]	熊小慧, 张朵朵, 耿语堂, 杨波, 唐明赞, 陈光. 400 km/h高速列车过隧道时列车风特性研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34(1): 106-115.
[8]	彭善碧, 李薇, 唐平. 基于FLACS的地下暗厨房燃气爆炸数值模拟[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34(1): 215-222.
[9]	王瑜, 焦晓亮, 赵长海, 宋德林. 露天煤矿吊斗铲倒堆工艺粉尘扩散特征研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(S2): 188-194.
[10]	张莉聪, 李斯曼, 周振兴. 煤矿瓦斯多相协同抑爆的研究进展与展望[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(S1): 97-104.
[11]	张健, 张鹏妍, 魏建平, SI Guangyao, 许博, 许振国. 巷道围岩调热圈分布特性研究:以羊场湾煤矿为例[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(8): 125-133.
[12]	安伟光, 广大庆. 隧道运动体火灾温度分布及烟气输运特性[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(8): 77-83.
[13]	仇培云, 陈俊沣, 程辉航, 龙增, 钟茂华. 地铁停车线区域通风排烟模式研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(7): 156-163.
[14]	李沛琳, 蒋仲安, 曾发镔. 制曲车间多尘源粉尘分布特征数值模拟[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(4): 130-139.
[15]	张仲宇, 李兆平, 杨航, 龙奇峰, 冯超. 并行基坑施工对邻近桥梁影响及保护措施[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(3): 68-74.