认知结构变量对起重作业人员违章行为意向的影响

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2018.01.002

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (1): 8-13.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2018.01.002

认知结构变量对起重作业人员违章行为意向的影响

晋良海^1,2 副教授, 龚润^**2, 陈述^1,2 副教授, 肖金克², 蔡莉莉², 姚若军³

1 湖北省水电工程施工与管理重点实验室(三峡大学),湖北宜昌 443002
2 三峡大学水利与环境学院,湖北宜昌 443002
3 宁夏水利科学研究院,宁夏银川 750001

收稿日期:2017-10-13 出版日期:2018-01-28 发布日期:2020-09-28
通讯作者: ** 龚润(1994—),女,湖北黄冈人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为工程管理。E-mail:1361902371@qq.com。
作者简介:晋良海 (1973—),男,四川简阳人,博士,副教授,主要从事水利水电建设项目运筹、施工作业安全工效研究。E-mail:16405495@qq.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助(51609128);水电工程施工与管理湖北省重点实验室(三峡大学)开放基金资助(2016KSD13,2016KSD06)。

Influences of cognitive structure variables on lifting workers' intentions to violate

JIN Lianghai^1,2, GONG Run², CHEN Shu^1,2, XIAO Jinke², CAI Lili², YAO Ruojun³

1 Hubei Key Laboratory of Construction and Management in Hydropower Engineering, China Three Gorges University, Yichang Hubei 443002, China
2 College of Hydraulic and Environmental Engineering,China Three Gorges University,Yichang Hubei 443002,China
3 Ningxia Academy of Water Resources, Yinchuan Ningxia 750001,China

Received:2017-10-13 Online:2018-01-28 Published:2020-09-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探究认知结构变量对起重作业人员违章行为意向的影响,基于计划行为理论(TPB),引入风险感知、安全意识和行为经验3个认知结构变量,构建作业人员违章行为意向假设模型;通过统计分析257份有效问卷,验证假设模型;利用结构方程模型(SEM)揭示认知结构变量对起重作业违章行为意向的影响路径。研究表明:安全意识、行为经验、行为态度、主观规范和知觉行为控制对违章行为意向均有显著的正向影响;风险感知通过安全意识、安全意识通过行为经验间接正向影响违章行为意向;风险感知、安全意识、行为经验、主观规范和知觉行为控制均通过行为态度间接正向影响违章行为意向。

关键词: 违章行为意向, 认知结构变量, 计划行为理论(TPB), 结构方程模型(SEM), 风险感知, 安全意识, 行为经验

Abstract: The paper aimed at exploring the effects of cognitive structural variables on lifting workers' intentions to violate. On the basis of TPB, a model of lifting workers' violation behavior intention was built by introducing three cognitive structural variables, risk perception, safety consciousness and behavioral experiences. The hypothesis model was validated through the statistical analysis of the data on 257workers, obtained by carrying out a questionnaire survey, and SEM was used to reveal the influence paths of cognitive structural variables on lifting workers' intentions to violate.The result shows that safety consciousness, behavior experience, behavioral attitudes, subjective norms and perceptual behavior control have a remarkable direct effect on the intention to violate, that risk perception has a remarkable indirect effect on the intention through safety consciousness, that safety consciousness also has a remarkable indirect effect on the intention through behavioral experience, and that lifting workers' violation behavior intentions are also indirectly effected by risk perception,subjective norms and perceptual behavior control through the medium of behavioral attitude.

Key words: intention to violate, cognitive structure variables, theory of planned behavior (TPB), structural equation model(SEM), risk perception, safety consciousness, behavior experience

中图分类号:

X923

晋良海, 龚润, 陈述, 肖金克, 蔡莉莉, 姚若军. 认知结构变量对起重作业人员违章行为意向的影响[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(1): 8-13.

JIN Lianghai, GONG Run, CHEN Shu, XIAO Jinke, CAI Lili, YAO Ruojun. Influences of cognitive structure variables on lifting workers' intentions to violate[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2018, 28(1): 8-13.

参考文献

[1] 2017年一季度房屋市政工程生产安全事故情况通报[BE/OL].(2017-04-24).http://www.mohurd.gov.cn/wjfb/ 201704/t20170428_231673.html.
[2] 张孟春, 方东平. 建筑工人不安全行为产生的认知原因和管理措施[J]. 土木工程学报, 2012,45(增2): 297-305.
ZHANG Mengchun, FANG Dongping. Cognitive causes of construction worker's unsafe behaviors and management measures[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2012,45(S2): 297-305.
[3] AJZEN I. The theory of planned behavior[J]. Research in Nursing & Health, 1991, 14(2): 137-144.
[4] FISHBEIN Martin,AJZEN Icek. Belief, attitude, intention and behavior:an introduction to theory and research [J]. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 1975, 41(4): 842-844.
[5] 李乃文, 马跃, 牛莉霞. 基于计划行为理论的矿工故意违章行为意向研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2011,21(10): 3-9.
LI Naiwen, MA Yue, NIU Lixia. Research on miners' deliberate violation behavior intentions based on theory of planned behavior[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2011,21(10): 3-9.
[6] 晋良海, 肖金克, 张荣坤. 高处作业个体安全防护的修正行为意向模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2016,26(7): 12-17.
JIN Lianghai, XIAO Jinke, ZHANG Rongkun. Study on modified TPB model for individual safeguarding behavioral intention during high-altitude operation[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2016,26(7): 12-17.
[7] 王丹. 基于计划行为理论的矿工违章行为研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2011,21(4): 7-12.
WANG Dan. Study of Miners'violation behaviors based on theory of planned behavior[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2011,21(4): 7-12.
[8] FORWARD S E. The theory of planned behaviour: tole of descriptive norms and past behaviour in the prediction ofdrivers' intentions to violate[J]. Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology & Behaviour, 2009, 12(3): 198-207.
[9] WICKENS C D. Engineering psychology and human performance[M]. New York:HarperCollins Publishers, 1992:27.
[10] RASMUSSEN J. Human errors. a taxonomy for describing human malfunction in industrial installations [J]. Journal of Occupational Accidents, 1982,4(2/3/4): 311-333.
[11] COOPER S E, WREATHALL J, THOMPSON C M D M, et al. Knowledge-base for the new human reliability analysis method, a technique for human error analysis (ATHEANA)[J]. Office of Scientific & Technical Information Technical Reports, 1996, 84(4): 477-485.
[12] HOLLNAGEL E. Cognitive reliability and error analysis method (CREAM)[M]. London:Elsevier Science, 1998: 262-275.
[13] KINES P. Case studies of occupational falls from heights: cognition and behavior in context[J]. Journal of Safety Research,2003,34(3): 263-71.
[14] SHEPPARD B H, HARTWICK J, WARSHAW P R. The theory of reasoned action: a meta-analysis of past rese[J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 1988, 15(3): 325-343.
[15] SLOVIC P. The perception of risk[J]. Risk Society & Policy, 2000, 69(3):112.
[16] 杨辰飞, 陈雪波, 孙秋柏. 企业员工安全意识影响因素的探索和分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2015,25(1): 34-39.
YANG Chenfei, CHEN Xuebo, SUN Qiubai. Exploration and analysis of factors influencing employees'safety awareness[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2015,25(1): 34-39.
[17] PARKER J F. A human factors guide for aviation maintenance[J]. Proceedings of the Human Factors, 1993, 37(1): 30-33.
[18] 段文婷, 江光荣. 计划行为理论述评[J]. 心理科学进展, 2008,16(2): 315-320.
DUAN Wenting, JIANG Guangrong. A review of the theory of planned behavior[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2008,16(2): 315-320.
[19] AJZEN I. Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior[J]. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2002, 32(4): 665-683.
[20] JGJ 276—2012,建筑施工高处作业安全技术规范[S].
JGJ 276-2012,Safety technical specifications of high altitude operation in construction[S].

认知结构变量对起重作业人员违章行为意向的影响

Influences of cognitive structure variables on lifting workers' intentions to violate

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	陈彦霖, 黄文炜, 李弘扬. 建筑企业差错管理氛围与工人安全绩效关系[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(5): 28-34.
[2]	戢晓峰, 耿昭师, 普永明, 卢梦媛, 覃文文. 接入道路对山区双车道公路穿村镇路段事故风险影响[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(5): 155-162.
[3]	秦雅琴, 李秋谷, 赵鹏燕, 宝发旺, 谢济铭. 基于多分类Adaboost算法的驾驶人风险感知倾向研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(4): 141-147.
[4]	李妙慧, 栗继祖. 群体动力对矿工不安全行为意向的影响研究^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(7): 48-55.
[5]	于光玉, 李慧民. 旧工业建筑改造施工安全影响机制研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(7): 120-129.
[6]	易涛, 栗继祖. 工作不安全感对矿工安全绩效的影响:基于代际差异视角[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(4): 49-56.
[7]	林晓飞, 林必毅, 宋守信, 喻萧, 沈凡. 地铁乘客火灾应激反应过程模型构建与分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(3): 142-147.
[8]	张磊, 彭金栓, 陈晓利. 驾驶分心行为量表设计与影响因素分析^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(11): 39-46.
[9]	李琰, 毛钰, 张燕. 建筑工人应急行为影响机制^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(10): 1-7.
[10]	梁娜. 铁路营业线施工安全风险分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(S1): 27-31.
[11]	王丹, 秦云云. 家长式领导对员工安全行为的影响:心理资本的中介作用和犬儒主义的调节作用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(8): 25-30.
[12]	张建设, 张文宇, 程瑞雅, 罗春阳, 王天星. 安全事故与施工企业网络能力的结构方程模型^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(6): 57-63.
[13]	汤天培, 周溪召, 盛典, 曹阳. 非机动车用户违规骑行意向与事故倾向性研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(6): 128-134.
[14]	安宇, 王袆, 李子琪, 张姜博南, 佟瑞鹏. 基于TPB的矿工不安全行为形成机制[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(10): 20-26.
[15]	安宇, 李建飞, 李虹玮, 祁明辉, 许素睿, 佟瑞鹏. 煤矿安全监管人员工作压力与行为作用机制[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(1): 7-13.