场景对驾驶人危险辨识能力评估结果的影响

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2018.04.006

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为提高用驾驶人危险辨识能力评估系统得到的评估结果的信效度,探讨评估场景对评估结果的影响。首先,分析各类评估系统中评估场景的异同点;其次,由于评估场景一般为危险情境,通过对危险定义与类型、危险风险度的系统梳理,探讨危险情境对评估结果的影响;最后,通过分析动静态场景的优缺点,探讨场景展现形式对评估结果的影响。结果表明:危险情境的主观和客观风险度的一致性越高,评估结果的信效度越好;动静态场景各有利弊,静态场景能有效避免评估结果的模糊性和驾驶人的疲劳厌烦效应,动态场景更利于理解危险情境,同时更贴近驾驶人实际驾驶时的危险辨识工作机制。

关键词: 危险辨识, 评估场景, 驾驶人, 评估结果, 信效度

Abstract: To improve the reliability and validity of evaluation results of drivers obtained by using drivers' hazard perception evaluation systems, the effects of evaluation scenarios on evaluation result were discussed. Firstly, the similarities and differences between the evaluation scenarios in various types of evaluation systems were analyzed. Then, as evaluation scenarios are generally dangerous scenarios, the effects of dangerous scenarios on evaluation results were analyzed through systematically reviewing the definition, types and risk degrees of dangerous scenarios. Finally, through analyzing the advantages and disadvantages of the static and dynamic scenarios, the effects of scenarios forms on evaluation results were explored. The results indicate that the higher the consistency between the subjective and objective risks in dangerous scenarios, the better the reliability and validity of the scenarios results, that the static and dynamic scenarios have their advantages and disadvantages, that the static scenarios can effectively avoid the ambiguity of the evaluation results and the driver's tiredness and boredom effect, and that the dynamic scenarios are more conducive to the understanding of dangerous scenarios and are closer to the hazard perception working mechanism when the driver is actually driving.

Key words: hazard perception, evaluation scenarios, driver, evaluation result, reliability and validity

中图分类号:

X913.4

吴初娜, 曾诚. 场景对驾驶人危险辨识能力评估结果的影响[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(4): 30-35.

WU Chu'na, ZENG Cheng. Effects of scenarios on drivers' hazard perception evaluation result[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2018, 28(4): 30-35.

参考文献

[1] ROBERT B I,NICOLA J S,AMY R W.Video-based road commentary training improves hazard perception of young drivers in a dual task[J].Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2009, 41(3): 445-452.
[2] 秦雅琴, 张红强, 熊坚, 等. 风险驾驶模拟情境下驾驶人风险感知研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2015,15(2): 142-148.
QIN Yaqin, ZHANG Hongqiang, XIONG Jian, et al. Driver's hazard perception under simulating risk driving scenarios[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2015, 15(2): 142-148.
[3] 刘新洋. 驾驶员危险知觉综述研究[J]. 社会心理科学, 2012, 27(2):29-32,61.
LIU Xinyang. A study on driver's risk perception review[J]. Science of Social Psychology, 2012, 27(2):29-32,61.
[4] WOLL J D. Vorad collision warning radar[C].Radar Conference,1995: 369-372.
[5] VANLAAR W, YANNIS G. Perception of road accident causes[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2006, 38(1): 155-161.
[6] 张茜. 驾驶经验与人格特征对驾驶人危险感受影响的研究[D]. 大连: 辽宁师范大学, 2010.
ZHANG Qian. A study of the effect of driving experience and personality on driver's risk perception[D]. Dalian: Liaoning Normal University, 2010.
[7] 孙龙, 常若松. 汽车驾驶员危险知觉测试研究进展[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2014, 24(1): 10-14.
SUN Long, CHANG Ruosong. Advances in drivers' hazard perception test research[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2014, 24(1): 10-14.
[8] SCIALFA C T, BORKENHAGEN D, LYON J, et al. The effects of driving experience on responses to a static hazard perception test[J].Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2012,43(5): 1 759-1 770.
[9] FULLER R. Driver training and assessment: implications of the task-difficulty homeostasis model[C]. Driver Behavior and Training, 2007: 337-348.
[10] HULL M, CHRISTIE R. Hazard perception test: the geelong trial and future development[C]. Proceedings of the National Road Safety Seminar, 1992: 148-165.
[11] MCGOWAN A M, BANBURY S P. Evaluating interruption-based techniques using embedded measures of driver anticipation[C]. A Cognitive Approach to Situation Awareness: Theory and Application, 2004, 176-192.
[12] 零事故研究所. 危险感知测试[EB/OL].[2016-06-20]. http://carrisk.cathay-ins.com.tw/aware_test.asp.
[13] 郭应时, 付锐, 袁伟, 等.驾驶人潜在危险预知能力评估系统研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2013, 23(3): 73-78.
GUO Yingshi, FU Rui, YUAN Wei, et al. Research on the assessment system of drivers' ability to detect the potential hazard[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2013, 23(3): 73-78.
[14] Government of South Australia. Hazard Perception Test[EB/OL].[2016-06-20]. http://mylicence.sa.gov.au/hazard-perception-test/3/2.
[15] UNDERWOOD G, CRUNDALL D, CHAPMAN P. Driving simulator validation with hazard perception[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2011, 14(6): 435-446.
[16] 王延斌. 新驾驶员险情感知训练研究[D]. 北京: 清华大学, 2010.
WANG Yanbin. Research on new drivers' risk perception training[D]. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2010.
[17] CRUNDALL D, CHAPMAN P, TRAWLEY S, et al. Some hazards are more attractive than others: drivers of varying experience respond differently to different types of hazard[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2012, 45(3): 600-609.
[18] SHAHAR A, ALBERTI C F, CLARKE D, et al. Hazard perception as a function of target location and the field of view[J]. Accident Analysis& Prevention,2010, 42(6): 1 577-1 584.
[19] 王焕博, 常若松, 马锦飞. 不同音乐条件下驾驶员注意广度对危险知觉的影响[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2016, 26(3): 21-26.
WANG Huanbo, CHANG Ruosong, MA Jinfei. Influence of drivers' attention span on hazard perception under different music conditions[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2016, 26(3): 21-26.
[20] 都萌, 施颖. 提高驾驶员危险预测能力的训练方法研究[J]. 科技资讯, 2011(34): 213.
[21] MEIR A, BOROWSKY A, ORON-GILAD T. Formation and evaluation of act and anticipate hazard perception training (AAHPT) intervention for young novice drivers[J]. Traffic Injury Prevention, 2014, 15(2): 172-180.
[22] CHARLES T S, DAVID B, JOHN L, et al. A comparison of static and dynamic hazard Perception tests[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2013, 51(2): 268-273.
[23] WETTON M A, HORSWILL M S, HATHERLY C, et al. The development and validation of two complementary measures of drivers' hazard perception ability[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2010, 42(4): 1 232-1 239.
[24] HAWORTH N, SYMMONS M, KOWADLO N. Hazard perception by inexperienced motorcyclist[J]. Research Report, 2000,6(3): 221-231.
[25] GARAY L, FISHER D, HANCOCK K L. Effects of driving experience and lighting condition on driving performance[J]. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting Proceedings, 2004, 48(19): 2 290-2 294.
[26] 常若松, 马锦飞, 陈晓晨, 等. 驾驶员危险知觉情境问卷的编制[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2013, 21(2): 201-204.
CHANG Ruosong, MA Jinfei, CHEN Xiaochen, et al. Development of the situation questionnaire of driving hazard perception[J]. China Journal of Health Psychology, 2013, 21(2): 201-204.
[27] 金会庆, 何存道, 陈嵘. 危险感受[J]. 心理科学, 1994, 17(1):42-46, 54.
JIN Huiqing, HE Cundao, CHEN Rong. Risk perception[J]. Psychological Science, 1994, 17(1):42-46, 54.
[28] FRANK P, MCKENMA. What role should the concept of risk play in theories of accident involvement?[J]. Erogmics, 1988, 31(4): 469-484.
[29] ARMSBY P, BOYLE A J, WRIGHT C C. Methods for assessing drivers' perception of specific hazards on the road[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 1989, 21(1): 45-60.
[30] 曾诚, 吴初娜, 孟兴凯. 驾驶人危险辨识进展研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2016, 26(12): 74-79.
ZENG Cheng WU Chu'na, MENG Xingkai. A review of progress in studying drivers' hazard perception[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2016, 26(12): 74-79.
[31] SAGBERG F, BJORNSKAU T. Hazard perception and driving experience among novice drivers[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2006, 38(2): 407-414.
[32] WATTS G R, QUIMBY A R. Aspects of road layout that affect drivers' perception and risk taking[R]. TRRL Report, Transport and Road Research Laboratory, 1980.
[33] UNDERWOOD G, NGAI A, UNDERWOOD J. Driving experience and situation awareness in hazard detection[J]. Safety Science, 2013,56(7): 29-35.
[34] SAVAGE S W, POTTER D D, TATLER B W. Does preoccupation impair hazard perception? a simultaneous EEG and eye tracking study[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2013,17: 52-62.
[35] BOROWSKY A, SHINAR D, ORON-GILAD T. Age, skill, and hazard perception in driving[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2010, 42(4): 1 240-1 249.
[36] PRADHAN A K, HAMMEL K R, DERAMUS R, et al. The use of eye movements to evaluate the effects of driver age on risk perception in an advanced driving simulator[J]. The Journal of the Human Factors, 2005, 47(4): 840-852.