城际铁路盾构隧道下穿四孔箱涵引起沉降分析

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2018.11.019

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (11): 116-121.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2018.11.019

城际铁路盾构隧道下穿四孔箱涵引起沉降分析

朱垚锋^1,2 高级工程师, 田书广^1,2 工程师, 倪金鹏^1,2 工程师, 范国相^1,2 工程师

1 中铁十六局集团有限公司,北京 100018
2 中铁十六局集团北京轨道交通工程建设有限公司,北京 101100

收稿日期:2018-08-05 修回日期:2018-10-10 发布日期:2020-11-25
作者简介:朱垚锋 (1984—),男,河南许昌人,学士,高级工程师,主要从事地下工程、隧道工程等方面的研究。E-mail:373600104@qq.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助(51504016)。

Analysis of four-hole culvert settlement caused by underlying shield tunnel of intercity railway

ZHU Yaofeng^1,2, TIAN Shuguang^1,2, NI Jinpeng^1,2, FAN Guoxiang^1,2

1 China Railway 16th Bureau Group Co., Ltd., Beijing 100018, China
2 Beijing Metro Engineering Construction Co., Ltd., China Railway 16th Bureau Group Co., Ltd., Beijing 101100, China

Received:2018-08-05 Revised:2018-10-10 Published:2020-11-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为解决淤泥地层城际铁路盾构隧道下穿既有结构引起其沉降过大问题,以珠机城际铁路盾构隧道下穿四孔箱涵为工程背景,采用参照规范、数值模拟和现场监测的方法,研究淤泥地层盾构隧道下穿箱涵引起的沉降。建立三维数值模型分析加固前箱涵结构及周围土体的沉降值,并以此为依据提出加固方案;对加固后的沉降,建立新的数值模型;将现场监测数据与加固后数值计算值进行对比分析。结果表明:箱涵最大沉降模拟值由加固前的-45 mm减小为加固后的-1.5 mm,加固后现场监测值为-3.1 mm;地表最大沉降模拟值由加固前的-51 mm减小为加固后的-7 mm,加固后现场监测值为-10.1 mm;加固后数值模拟值与现场监测值二者的影响规律以及引起的沉降值基本一致,说明加固方案起到很好的加固效果以及所构建数值模型有合理可行性,可为今后类似工程提供借鉴。

关键词: 盾构隧道, 下穿, 沉降分析, 数值模拟, 现场监测, 加固方案

Abstract: To solve the problem of excessive settlement caused by shield tunnel of intercity railway underlying existing structure in silt stratum, in the background of shield tunnel underlying four-hole culvert on Zhuji Intercity Railway, the settlement caused by shield tunnel underlying four-hole culvert was analyzed after consulting related standards, carrying out numerical simulation and monitoring. A three-dimensional numerical model was built for analysis of the settlement value of the culvert structure and the surrounding soil before reinforcement. A strengthening scheme was designed and used. A new numerical model was built for analysis of the settlement after reinforcement. A comparison was made between the field monitoring data after reinforcement and the data obtained by using the new model. The results show that the maximum settlement value of culvert is reduced from -45 mm to -1.5 mm, the field monitoring value after reinforcement is -3.1 mm, and the maximum settlement value of surface is reduced from -51 mm to -7 mm, the field monitoring value after reinforcement is -10.1 mm, and that the reinforcement scheme has a good strengthening effect and the two numerical models have great effectiveness and it provides reference for future similar.

Key words: shield tunnel, passing through, settlement analysis, numerical simulation, monitoring, reinforcement scheme

中图分类号:

X948

朱垚锋, 田书广, 倪金鹏, 范国相. 城际铁路盾构隧道下穿四孔箱涵引起沉降分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(11): 116-121.

ZHU Yaofeng, TIAN Shuguang, NI Jinpeng, FAN Guoxiang. Analysis of four-hole culvert settlement caused by underlying shield tunnel of intercity railway[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2018, 28(11): 116-121.

参考文献

[1] 黄昌富, 田书广, 王艳辉, 等.新建隧洞垂直下穿既有地铁结构引起的沉降分析[J]. 铁道建筑, 2016 (3): 92-96.
HUANG Changfu, TIAN Shuguang, WANG Yanhui, et al. Analysis of settlement caused by vertical tunneling through existing metro structures in new tunnel[J]. Railway Construction, 2016 (3): 92-96.
[2] 姚海波.大断面隧道浅埋暗挖法下穿既有地铁构筑物施工技术研究[D].北京:北京交通大学, 2005.
YAO Haibo. Research on the construction technology of underlying subway structures with shallow buried and undercutting method for large section tunnel[D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2005.
[3] NGOC-ANH Do, DANIEL Dias, PIERPAOLO Oreste, et al. Three-dimensional numerical simulation of a mechanized twin tunnel in soft ground[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology,2014,42(5): 40-51.
[4] SIGL O, ATZL G. Design of bored tunnel linings for Singapore MRT northeast line C706[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology,1999,14(4): 481-490.
[5] 黄昌富, 田书广, 王艳辉, 等.盾构侧穿不同形式基础建筑物的沉降影响研究[J]. 施工技术, 2017, 46(1): 74-79.
HUANG Changfu, TIAN Shuguang, WANG Yanhui, et al. Research on the influence of shield tunneling on the settlement of different forms of foundation buildings [J]. Construction Technology, 2017, 46(1): 74-79.
[6] MROUEH H, SHAHROUR I. A simplified 3D model for tunnel construction using tunnel boring machines[J]. Tunneling and Underground Space Technology,2008,23(1): 38-45.
[7] 朱逢斌, 缪林昌, 林水仙. 盾构隧道动态施工诱发地面沉降试验研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(11): 116-120.
ZHU Fengbin, MIAO Linchang, LIN Shuixian. Experimental study on ground settlement caused by dynamic shield tunneling [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2017, 27(11): 116-120.
[8] 陶连金, 唐四海, 金亮. 隧道上穿既有车站结构的变形预测及安全评估[J].地下空间与工程学报, 2008, 4(3): 442-447.
TAO Lianjin, TANG Sihai, JIN Liang. Deformation prediction and safety assessment of existing station structures in tunnels[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2008, 4(3): 442-447.
[9] 郭磊, 方俊波. 超浅埋、超近距离穿越运营地铁区间人行隧道施工技术[J].现代隧道技术, 2001, 38(2): 34-39.
GUO Lei, FANG Junbo. Construction technology of ultra-shallow buried and super-distant cross-pedestrian crossing tunnels[J].Modern Tunneling Technology, 2001, 38(2): 34-39.
[10] 张成平, 张顶立, 王梦恕. 大断面隧道施工引起的上覆地铁隧道结构变形分析[J].岩土工程学报, 2009, 31(5): 805-810.
ZHANG Chengping, ZHANG Dingli, WANG Mengshu. Analysis of structural deformation of overlying subway tunnels caused by construction of large cross-section tunnels[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2009, 31(5): 805-810.
[11] 李涛, 刘波, 朱连华, 等. 双线盾构顺序下穿铁路箱涵的实例研究[J]. 太原理工大学学报, 2013, 44(3): 373-377.
LI Tao, LIU Bo, ZHU Lianhua, et al. Case study of double-shield tunneling under railway box culvert[J]. Journal of Taiyuan University of Technology, 2013, 44(3): 373-377.
[12] 杜晓伟, 高永涛. 软土地区大直径盾构对邻近桩基础建筑物影响研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2014, 10(12): 131-137.
DU Xiaowei, GAO Yongtao. Study on influence to pile foundation buildings by big diameter shield tunnelling construction in soft soil area [J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2014, 10(12): 131-137.

[1]	李刚, 刘海振, 杨庆贺, 牛伟锋. 带压开采煤层底板破坏特征与突水风险分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(5): 68-76.
[2]	郑艾辰, 向晋扬, 黄锋, 金成昊, 刘星辰. 空洞对隧道结构安全影响试验与模拟[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(5): 119-126.
[3]	游波, 毛聪, 施式亮, 刘何清, 鲁义, 李敏. 矿用通风服微空间环境变化特征研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(5): 185-193.
[4]	冯巩, 夏元友, 王智德, 严敏嘉. 基于位移信息融合的露天矿边坡动态预警方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(3): 116-122.
[5]	鲁义, 杨帆, 刘欢, 陈健, 王金鹏, 李文辉. 气凝胶消防救援服内衬的热阻计算^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(1): 201-207.
[6]	张钧祥, 刘彦伟, 任培良, 韩红凯, 左伟芹. 基于蠕变效应的穿层钻孔封孔参数优化与试验研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(7): 97-104.
[7]	丁厚成, 连志虚, 邓权龙, 蒋仲安, 杨利炜, 葛梦圆. 振弦栅与高压喷雾协同作用下除尘特性研究^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(6): 106-112.
[8]	荆德吉, 贾鑫, 张天, 孟祥曦, 马明星, 王志恒. 落煤过程中涡旋吹吸式除尘技术数值模拟及试验[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(6): 121-127.
[9]	朱豪豪, 郭海林, ZHUMAKELDI A. 外力作用下管道内表面缺陷处裂纹扩展研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(3): 66-72.
[10]	姜学鹏, 陈欣格, 郭昆. 侧部点式排烟隧道火灾临界风速研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(3): 105-111.
[11]	王亮, 孙毅民, 褚鹏, 赵伟, 邹双英. 基于时空分布特征的煤层瓦斯测压准确性研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(2): 40-47.
[12]	张萌, 刘宏磊, 乔文光, 高勋. 排土场稳定性影响因素显著性研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(2): 69-75.
[13]	曲国娜, 李红健, 贾廷贵, 强倩, 王来贵. 煤堆自燃特征的试验研究与数值模拟^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(12): 69-77.
[14]	荆德吉, 魏德宁, 马明星, 张天, 孟祥曦, 任帅帅. 胶带运输巷粉尘运移及气动喷雾降尘技术^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(11): 93-99.
[15]	崔村燕, 柳宁远, 段永胜, 同江. 长贮库房内偏二甲肼扩散浓度快速估算方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(1): 109-115.

城际铁路盾构隧道下穿四孔箱涵引起沉降分析

Analysis of four-hole culvert settlement caused by underlying shield tunnel of intercity railway

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价