Research on influencing factors of construction workers' safety competency integrating ISM and G1 method

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.04.0962

Abstract

Abstract:

To explore the factors affecting the safety competency of construction workers, a factor analysis method integrating ISM and G1-Method was proposed. Firstly, the influencing factors were summarized and extracted based on the software-hardware-environment-liveware-liveware(SHELL) model and factor analysis method. Secondly, the multi-level hierarchical structure model of influencing factors of workers' safety competency was constructed through the ISM. Finally, the G1 method was used to calculate the degree of correlation between various factors and the importance of their impact on safety competency. The results show that the constructed model of the influencing factors of safety competency includes two dimensions of safety cognition competency and safety behavior competency and 16 influencing factors. Among them, safety concepts, operation skills and environmental adaptation are the superficial factors for forming construction workers' safety competency, while safety education and management are the deep factors for forming safety competency. At the same time, safety concepts, safety education and training and environmental adaptation are the main influencing factors of safety cognition ability. Operation skills, safety education and training and safety management are the main influencing factors of safety behavior competency.

Key words: interpreting structural models (ISM), order relation analysis method (G1-Method), safety competency, construction workers, influencing factors, safety cognition competency, safety behavior competency

CHENG Lianhua, ZHAO Xudong, HAO Jie. Research on influencing factors of construction workers' safety competency integrating ISM and G1 method[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(4): 61-68.

Figures/Tables 9

Fig.1

Tab.1

Tab.2

Tab.3

Fig.2

Fig.3

Tab.4

Weight coefficient of safety competency indicators

目标层	识别层	W $' D d, 1$	W $' D d, 2$	排序	因素	W'_j_,1	W'_j_,2	排序
建筑工人安全能力	D₁	0.527	0.466	1	F₁	0.166	0.093	1,5
					F₁₂	0.092	0.145	5,1
					F₁₆	0.111	0.109	3,4
					F₁₅	0.029	0.029	15,14
					F₅	0.056	0.044	7,8
					F₁₀	0.043	0.021	8,16
					F₈	0.030	0.025	14,14
	D₂	0.251	0.275	2	F₁₃	0.031	0.035	13,12
					F₇	0.124	0.119	2,3
					F₂	0.096	0.121	4,2
	D₃	0.065	0.089	4	F₆	0.031	0.046	12,7
	D₃	0.065	0.089	4	F₃	0.034	0.043	11,9
	D₄	0.096	0.103	3	F₉	0.059	0.061	6,6
	D₄	0.096	0.103	3	F₁₄	0.037	0.042	10,10
	D₅	0.061	0.067	5	F₄	0.023	0.036	16,11
	D₅	0.061	0.067	5	F₁₁	0.038	0.031	9,13

Tab.4

Fig.4

Fig.5

References 15

[1]	住房和城乡建设部办公厅. 住房和城乡建设部办公厅关于2019年房屋市政工程生产安全事故情况的通报[EB/OL]. [2022-12-01].
[2]	郭聖煜, 郭文会, 宫培松. 地铁施工工人不安全行为统计过程控制研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(7):153-158. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2018.07.025
	GUO Shengyu, GUO Wenhui, GONG Peisong. Research on statistical process control of metro construction workers' unsafe behaviors[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2018, 28(7):153-158. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2018.07.025
[3]	马国强. 施工人员安全能力评价指标体系构建及实证研究[D]. 南京: 东南大学, 2015.
	MA Guoqiang. Construction and empirical research of safety evaluation index system of construction workers[D]. Nanjing: Southeast University, 2015.
[4]	王盼盼, 李启明, 邓小鹏. 施工人员安全能力模型研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2009, 19(8):40-45.
	WANG Panpan, LI Qiming, DENG Xiaopeng. Study on safety competency model of construction workers[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2009, 19(8):40-45.
[5]	GOVAERTS M J B. Educational competencies or education for professional competence[J]. Medical Education, 2008, 42(3): 234-236. doi: 10.1111/med.2008.42.issue-3
[6]	CHANG Shuhsuan, CHEN Derfa, WU Tsungchih. Developing a competency model for safety professionals: correlations between competency and safety functions[J]. Journal of Safety Research, 2012, 43(5/6): 339-350. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2012.10.009
[7]	王旭峰, 邱坤南, 阳富强, 等. 建筑工人个体安全能力影响因素效用量化研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2015, 25(3):133-139.
	WANG Xufeng, QIU Kunnan, YANG Fuqiang, et al. Research on quantizing utility of factors influencing on individual safety competence of construction workers[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2015, 25(3): 133-139.
[8]	梁孔政. 基于胜任素质的施工工人安全能力模型研究[D]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2015.
	LIANG Kongzheng. Research on safety capability model for construction workers based on competency theory[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 2015.
[9]	杜红兵, 马振威, 张庆庆. 基于ANP和SPA的民航飞行员安全能力评价[J]. 工业安全与环保, 2015, 41(6):83-86.
	DU Hongbing, MA Zhenwei, ZHANG Qingqing. Civilian pilots safety capability assessment based on ANP and SPA[J]. Industrial Safety and Environmental Protection, 2015, 41(6): 83-86.
[10]	李云, 刘霁, 姜安民. 基于变异系数法与模糊理论的建筑工人安全能力评价研究[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2020, 17(8):2162-2170.
	LI Yun, LIU Ji, JIANG Anmin. Study on safety ability evaluation of construction workers based on variation coefficient method and fuzzy theory[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2020, 17(8): 2162-2170.
[11]	邓小鹏, 王盼盼, 李启明, 等. 基于FSDT的地铁盾构施工人员安全能力评价[J]. 解放军理工大学学报:自然科学版, 2011, 12(3): 289-293.
	DENG Xiaopeng, WANG Panpan, LI Qiming, et al. Safety competence assessment on shield metro construction workers based on fuzzy signal detection theory[J]. Journal of PLA University of Science and Technology:National Science, 2011, 12(3): 289-293.
[12]	马利华, 颜会哲, 姚立根, 等. 网络关系特征下IVIFS模型的建筑工人安全能力评价[J]. 数学的实践与认识, 2018, 48(22):34-40.
	MA Lihua, YAN Huizhe, YAO Ligen, et al. Evaluation of the safety capability of construction workers with network relational characteristics based on IVIFS model[J]. Mathematics in Practice and Theory, 2018, 48(22): 34-40.
[13]	吴超, 王秉. 行为安全管理元模型研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2018, 14(2):5-11.
	WU Chao, WANG Bing. Research on meta-model of behavior-based safety management[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2018, 14(2): 5-11.
[14]	杨晓强, 张智华, 姜浩然, 等. CPE和G1法的机场安全绩效评价指标体系研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(3):1-7. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.03.001
	YANG Xiaoqiang, ZHANG Zhihua, JIANG Haoran, et al. Research on airport safety performance evaluation index system based on criteria for performance excellence and G1 method[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(3): 1-7. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.03.001
[15]	秦旋, MANCINI M, TRAVAGLINI A, 等. 基于市场推广视角的BIM技术采纳障碍因素中意对比研究[J]. 管理学报, 2016, 13(11): 1718-1727.
	QIN Xuan, MANCINI M, TRAVAGLINI A, et al. A comparative study on barriers between China and Italy in BIM adoption from the construction market perspective[J]. Chinese Journal of Management, 2016, 13(11): 1718-1727.

维度	能力因子	解释
安全认知能力A₁	风险感知能力B₁	工人对施工作业中存在的风险信息进行感知和处理的能力
	风险理解能力B₂	工人对客观存在危险发生概率与后果的直观判断与主观感觉能力
	安全决策能力B₃	工人对施工环境未来安全状态的控制与优化方案做出决策的能力
安全行为能力A₂	安全待人能力B₄	工人保障自身或他人安全方面的行为反应能力
	安全处事能力B₅	工人处理安全相关事务中的行为反应能力
	安全接物能力B₆	工人安全防护行为及对安全设施设备的操作行为能力

目标层	识别层	因素层
建筑工人安全能力	个人特质界面D₁	安全意识S₁、安全知识S₂、安全态度S₃、安全操作技能S₄、工作经验S₅、文化素养S₆、身体状况S₇、心理情绪S₈、环境适应力S₉、工作满意度S₁₀
	S-L因素界面D₂	施工任务S₁₁、安全教育培训S₁₂、安全投入S₁₃、安全激励S₁₄、操作规范S₁₅、安全道德规范S₁₆
	H-L因素界面D₃	人机匹配S₁₇、设备可靠度S₁₈、操作设备S₁₉、安全防护配置S₂₀、安全设施S₂₁
	L-L因素界面D₄	人际关系S₂₂、关键人物领导S₂₃、安全示范S₂₄、群体沟通S₂₅、群体监督S₂₆
	E-L因素界面D₅	采光照明S₂₇、环境噪音S₂₈、环境卫生S₃₉、空气气候S₃₀、安全氛围S₃₁

主成分命名	方差累积%	显著性影响因素
安全观念F₁	17.393	S₁、S₂、S₃
安全管理F₂	30.047	S₁₁、S₁₃、S₁₄
设备设施配置F₃	37.566	S₁₉、S₂₀、S₂₁
现场环境F₄	44.917	S₂₇、S₂₈、S₂₉、S₃₀
身心状态F₅	50.540	S₇、S₈
设备安全F₆	55.471	S₁₇、S₁₈
安全教培F₇	59.503	S₁₂
工作满意度F₈	63.387	S₁₀
群体引导F₉	67.077	S₂₃、S₂₄
文化素养F₁₀	70.306	S₆
安全氛围F₁₁	73.185	S₃₁
操作技能F₁₂	75.946	S₄
行为规范F₁₃	78.547	S₁₅、S₁₆
群体交际F₁₄	80.884	S₂₂、S₂₅、S₂₆
工作经验F₁₅	83.063	S₅
环境适应F₁₆	85.048	S₉