损失认知、安全态度与企业安全生产行为关系研究

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2017.10.021

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (10): 123-129.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2017.10.021

损失认知、安全态度与企业安全生产行为关系研究

刘素霞副教授, 朱雨晴, 梅强教授

江苏大学管理学院,江苏镇江 212013

收稿日期:2017-07-17 修回日期:2017-09-07 出版日期:2017-10-20 发布日期:2020-11-05
作者简介:刘素霞 (1979—),女,河北河间人,博士,副教授,主要从事企业安全管理、安全管制等方面的研究。E-mail:suxialiu@yeah.net。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助(71403108,71373104);中国博士后科学基金资助(2016M590426);江苏省博士后基金资助(1501073C);江苏省“青蓝工程”项目。

Relationships between perception of loss, safety attitude and enterprises' work safety behavior

LIU Suxia, ZHU Yuqing, MEI Qiang

School of Management, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang Jiangsu 212013, China

Received:2017-07-17 Revised:2017-09-07 Online:2017-10-20 Published:2020-11-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为规范企业安全生产行为,以知信行(KAP)理论和安全管理学相关理论为基础,构建预期事故损失认知、安全态度与企业安全生产行为关系的理论模型,深入分析损失认知、安全态度对企业安全生产行为的影响机制;并通过33个题项867份有效问卷收集数据,采用因子分析和结构方程模型(SEM)验证以上理论模型。结果表明:预期事故损失、安全态度分别对企业安全生产行为产生显著的直接正向影响;预期事故损失与安全态度显著正相关;预期间接损失认知与安全态度在对企业安全生产行为作用过程中存在着显著的正交互效应。因此,通过提高企业决策者对预期事故损失的认知水平和安全态度来规范企业安全生产行为,是提升企业安全生产绩效的有效途径。

关键词: 预期事故损失, 认知, 安全态度, 安全生产行为, 结构方程模型(SEM)

Abstract: To regulate enterprises' work safety behavior, a conceptual model was built based on KAP theory and the theory of safety management, for analyzing the relationships between perception of expected accident loss, safety attitude and enterprises' work safety behavior. Influence mechanisms of perception of expected accident loss, safety attitude on enterprises' work safety behavior were analyzed deeply. Through the data collection of 867 valid questionnaires of 33 items, the model was verified by using factor analysis and SEM. The results show that perception of expected accident loss and safety attitude have significant direct positive effects on enterprises' work safety behavior respectively, that perception of expected accident loss is positively correlated with safety attitude, and there is a positive interaction between the perception of expected accident indirect loss and the safety attitude when they affect enterprises' work safety behavior, and that an effective way to improve the level of enterprises' work safety is improving the enterprise policy makers' cognition of the expected accident loss and improving their safety attitude.

Key words: expected accident loss, perception, safety attitude, work safety behavior, structural equation model(SEM)

中图分类号:

X921

刘素霞, 朱雨晴, 梅强. 损失认知、安全态度与企业安全生产行为关系研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(10): 123-129.

LIU Suxia, ZHU Yuqing, MEI Qiang. Relationships between perception of loss, safety attitude and enterprises' work safety behavior[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2017, 27(10): 123-129.

参考文献

[1] 梅强,李钊,刘素霞,等. 基于Multi-Agent的中小煤矿安全生产管制效果研究[J]. 工业工程与管理, 2015, 20(4): 142-151.
MEI Qiang, LI Zhao, LIU Suxia, et al. Research on safety regulation effect of small and medium-sized coal mine based on multi-agent modeling method[J]. Industrial Engineering and Management, 2015, 20(4): 142-151.
[2] HALE A, BORYS D, ADAMS M. Safety regulation: the lessons of workplace safety rule management for managing the regulatory burden [J]. Safety Science, 2013, 51(4): 1-11.
[3] 张菁菁,梅强,刘素霞,等. 安全偏好对小微企业安全生产水平影响研究:基于生产要素竞争视角[J]. 预测, 2016, 35 (5):68-73.
ZHANG Jingjing, MEI Qiang, LIU Suxia, et al. The influence of safety preference on production safety of small enterprises:from the perspective of the competition of production factors[J]. Forecasting, 2016, 35 (5):68-73.
[4] NEAL A, GRIFFIN M A. A study of the lagged relationships among safety climate, safety motivation, safety behavior, and accidents at the individual and group levels [J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2006, 91(4): 946-953.
[5] 梅强,叶俊宇. 舆论监督环境优化研究:以中小企业安全生产为例[J]. 江淮论坛, 2011 (6):133-136.
[6] WALTERS D,JAMES P. What motivates employers to establish preventive management arrangements within supply chains? [J]. Safety Science, 2011, 49(7): 988-994.
[7] LOCKE R, AMENGUAL M, MANGLA A. Virtue out of necessity?: compliance, commitment, and the improvement of labor conditions in global supply chains [J]. Politics & Society, 2009, 37(3):319-351.
[8] Safe Work Australia. The cost of work related injury and illness for Australian employers, workers and the community 2008-2009[R], 2012.
[9] Publications Office of the European Union. Estimate the cost of accidents and ill-health at work: a review of methodologies[R],2014.
[10] GB6441—1986,企业职工伤亡事故分类标准[S].
GB6441-1986,Classification standard for casualty accidents of enterprise workers[S].
[11] CHURCHILL G A. Paradigm for developingbetter measures of marketing constructs [J]. Journal of Marketing Researeh, 1979, 16(4):64-73.
[12] SEXTON J B, HELMREICH R L, NEILANDS T B, et al. The safety attitudes questionnaire: psychometric properties, benchmarking data, and emerging research [J]. BMC Health Services Research, 2006, 6(1):6-44.
[13] FERNANDEZ-MUNIZ B, MONTES-PEON J M, VAZQUEZ-ORDDAS C J. Safety management system: development and validation of a multidimensional scale [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2007, 20(1):52-68.
[14] LIN Sihao, TANG Wenjuan, MIAO Jianying, et al. Safety climate measurement at workplace in China: a validity and reliability assessment[J].Safety Science, 2008,46(7):1 037-1 046.
[15] WARING A. Managerial and non-technical factors in the development of human-created disasters: a review and research agenda [J]. Safety Science, 2015, 79:254-267.
[16] SHIN M, LEE H S, PARK M, et al. A system dynamics approach for modeling construction workers' safety attitudes and behaviors [J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2014, 68(2):95-105.
[17] BBHAN B, CRAINIC D, EECKHOUDT L. Comorbidities and the willingness to pay for health improvements [J]. Journal of Public Economics, 2003, 87: 2 399-2 406.
[18] ZOHAR D, EREV I. On the difficulty of promoting workers' safety behavior: overcoming the underweighting of routine tasks [J]. International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management, 2007, 7(2):122-136.
[19] RAFAJ P, KYPREOS S. Internalisation of external cost in the power generation sector: analysis with global multi-regional MARKAL model [J]. Energy Policy, 2007, 35: 828-843.
[20] OLIVIERI A, BENACCHIO L, BIZZOTTO R, et al. Empowering employers in work-related injuries prevention: a pragmatic trial[J]. Safety Science, 2015, 74:122-127.
[21] JITWASINKUL B, HADIKUSUMO B H W, MEMON A Q. A Bayesian belief network model of organizational factors for improving safe work behaviors in Thai construction industry [J]. Safety Science, 2016, 82:264-273.
[22] VELTRI A, PAGELL M, JOHNSTON D, et al. Understanding safety in the context of business operations: an exploratory study using case studies [J]. Safety Science, 2013, 55:119-134.
[23] LIU Xinxia, HUANG Guoxian, HUANG Huiqiang, et al. Safety climate, safety behavior, and worker injuries in the Chinese manufacturing industry[J]. Safety Science, 2015, 78:173-178.
[24] RUNDMO T. Associations between risk perception and safety [J]. Safety Science, 1996, 24(3): 197-209.
[25] 董志勇. 实验经济学[M].北京: 北京大学出版社, 2005: 43-48.
[26] HUANG Yueng-Hsiang, LEAMON T B, COURTNEY T K, et al. Corporate financial decision-makers' perceptions of workplace safety [J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2007, 39(4): 767-775.
[27] 梅强, 刘素霞. 中小企业安全生产“供求”与政府管制[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2010, 20(3):113-119.
MEI Qiang, LIU Suxia. “Supply and demand” small and medium enterprises' work safety and its government regulation[J].China Safety Science Journal, 2010, 20(3):113-119.
[28] ZHAO Dong, MCCOY A P, KLEINER B M, et al. Stakeholder perceptions of risk in construction [J]. Safety Science, 2016, 82:111-119.
[29] 温忠麟, 侯杰泰, 马什·赫伯特.潜变量交互效应分析方法[J]. 心理科学进展, 2003,11(5): 593-599.
WEN Zhonglin, HOU Jietai, HERBERT M W. Methods and recent research development in analysis of interaction effects between latent variables [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2003, 11(5): 593-599.

损失认知、安全态度与企业安全生产行为关系研究

Relationships between perception of loss, safety attitude and enterprises' work safety behavior

PDF

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	陈彦霖, 黄文炜, 李弘扬. 建筑企业差错管理氛围与工人安全绩效关系[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(5): 28-34.
[2]	戢晓峰, 耿昭师, 普永明, 卢梦媛, 覃文文. 接入道路对山区双车道公路穿村镇路段事故风险影响[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(5): 155-162.
[3]	陈述, 任亚萍, 席炎, 向蕾, 崔洁. 动态惩罚机制下企业安全生产行为演化分析^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(1): 51-57.
[4]	李妙慧, 栗继祖. 群体动力对矿工不安全行为意向的影响研究^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(7): 48-55.
[5]	于光玉, 李慧民. 旧工业建筑改造施工安全影响机制研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(7): 120-129.
[6]	易涛, 栗继祖. 工作不安全感对矿工安全绩效的影响:基于代际差异视角[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(4): 49-56.
[7]	林晓飞, 林必毅, 宋守信, 喻萧, 沈凡. 地铁乘客火灾应激反应过程模型构建与分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(3): 142-147.
[8]	卢国英, 张婷. 交通标志语义认知与情绪加工的脑电研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(3): 184-190.
[9]	张磊, 彭金栓, 陈晓利. 驾驶分心行为量表设计与影响因素分析^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(11): 39-46.
[10]	王丹, 秦云云. 家长式领导对员工安全行为的影响:心理资本的中介作用和犬儒主义的调节作用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(8): 25-30.
[11]	杨越, 宋祥波, 王建忠. 基于TRACEr的管制员差错风险量化分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(8): 109-115.
[12]	张建设, 张文宇, 程瑞雅, 罗春阳, 王天星. 安全事故与施工企业网络能力的结构方程模型^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(6): 57-63.
[13]	汤天培, 周溪召, 盛典, 曹阳. 非机动车用户违规骑行意向与事故倾向性研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(6): 128-134.
[14]	郭楠, 王茜, 石坤杰, 栗继祖. 煤矿安全管理人员工作压力相关研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(5): 1-6.
[15]	陈龙, 王崴, 瞿珏, 胡波, 蔡睿, 赵敏睿. EEG功率信息显示特征对认知负荷的影响[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(2): 183-189.