China Safety Science Journal ›› 2020, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (3): 53-59.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.03.009

• Safety engineering technology • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Study on performance of gas-liquid extinguishing agent for lithium iron phosphate battery modules

HUANG Qiang1, TAO Fengbo1, LIU Yang1,2, SUN Lei1, NIU Zhiyuan3, JIN Yang3   

  1. 1. Research Institute, State Grid Jiangsu Electric Power Co., Ltd., Nanjing Jiangsu 210024, China;
    2. State Grid Jiangsu Electric Power Co., Ltd., Nanjing Jiangsu 211103, China;
    3. School of Electrical Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou Henan 450001, China
  • Received:2019-12-01 Revised:2020-02-10 Online:2020-03-28 Published:2021-01-26

Abstract: In order to study performance of different extinguishing agents for energy storage battery modules, an energy storage cabin test platform was built. With lithium iron phosphate energy storage battery module of 8.8 kWh as research object, fire was induced by thermal runaway from 0.5 C rate constant current overcharge, and experiments were conducted to compare performance of four fire-extinguishing agents, including medium-pressure water mist, Novec1230, heptafluoropropane and hexafluoropropane. The results show that hexafluoropropane can not extinguish battery fire within a short time while Novec1230 and heptafluoropropane can extinguish it quickly but can not cool it effectively with a tendency to reignite, all of which are not suitable to be fire extinguishing agent for lithium iron phosphate battery modules. However, medium-pressure water mist can quickly extinguish fire and prevent re-ignition with its continuous injection, thus making an ideal fire extinguishing material.

Key words: energy storage cabin, lithium iron phosphate battery, thermal runaway, extinguishing agent, battery module

CLC Number: