基于弹性工程概念的作业人员安全绩效研究

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2017.04.028

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (4): 157-162.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2017.04.028

基于弹性工程概念的作业人员安全绩效研究

司鹄^1,2 教授, 杨自立^1,2, 薛永志^1,2, 翟成林^1,2

1 煤矿灾害动力学与控制国家重点实验室,重庆 400044
2 重庆大学资源与环境科学学院,重庆 400044

收稿日期:2016-12-30 修回日期:2017-03-11 发布日期:2020-11-22
作者简介:司鹄 (1964—),女,重庆人,博士,教授,主要从事安全科学、工程力学以及流体力学的研究和教学工作。E-mail: sihu@cqu.edu.cn。
杨自立 (1991—),男,四川江油人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为安全管理、风险评估。E-mail:sihu@cqu.edu.cn。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助(51274259)

Study on safety performance of first line operators in industrial enterprise based on resilience engineering concept

SI Hu^1,2, YANG Zili^1,2, XUE Yongzhi^1,2, ZHAI Chenglin^1,2

1 State Key Laboratory of Coal Mine Disaster Dynamics and Control,Chongqing 400044,China
2 College of Resources and Environmental Science, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China

Received:2016-12-30 Revised:2017-03-11 Published:2020-11-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为提高企业作业人员安全绩效,引入弹性工程概念,总结提出基础弹性因子、行为弹性因子2个方面的7个弹性维度,并构建弹性工程概念对作业人员安全绩效的影响关系模型。根据一家国有化工企业的调研结果,利用多重中介的结构方程模型(SEM)与乘积分布算法进行量化分析,得到弹性概念维度对作业人员安全绩效的影响作用路径。结果表明,作业人员行为弹性因子直接影响安全绩效;4个基础弹性因子均可通过3个行为弹性因子不同的中介作用机制与作用效果,不同程度地正向影响员工的安全绩效;日常管理与事故预防行为分别为基础弹性因子与行为弹性因子中最具影响的弹性维度。

关键词: 作业人员, 安全管理, 弹性工程概念, 结构方程模型(SEM), 多重中介效应

Abstract: For improving the safety performance of the first line operators, 7 resilience dimensions related to work safety in enterprise, including basic resilience factors and behavioral resilience factors, were identified based on the resilience engineering concept,and a model was built for influences of the resilience dimensions on the performance. According to the investigation results from a state owned chemical industrial enterprise, a multiple mediation SEM based approach and a product distribution algorithm were applied to analyze the effective paths,along which the dimensions affect the performance. Study shows that the behavioral resilience factors of employee have a direct impact on safety performance,that the four basic resilience factors have different degrees of positive indirect influence on operators'safety performance, mediated by diversities influence mechanisms of behavioral resilience factors of employee,and that monitoring and preparedness are the most influencial dimension in the basic resilience factors and the behavioral resilience factors respectively.

Key words: operators, safety management, resilience engineeringconcept, structural equation modeling(SEM), multiple mediation effect

中图分类号:

X921

司鹄, 杨自立, 薛永志, 翟成林. 基于弹性工程概念的作业人员安全绩效研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(4): 157-162.

SI Hu, YANG Zili, XUE Yongzhi, ZHAI Chenglin. Study on safety performance of first line operators in industrial enterprise based on resilience engineering concept[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2017, 27(4): 157-162.

参考文献

[1] 廖中举. 企业安全绩效研究:内涵、测量及影响因素[J]. 中国安全科学学报,2015,25(11):139-144.
LIAO Zhongju. A literature review of firm's safety performance: its connotation measurement and factors affecting it[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2015,25(11):139-144.
[2] 樊运晓,傅贵,朱亚威,等. 安全管理体系产生与发展综述[J]. 中国安全科学学报,2015,25(8):3-9.
FAN Yunxiao, FU Gui, ZHU Yawei, et al. A review of establishment and development of safety management system[J]. China Safety Science Journal,2015,25(8):3-9.
[3] STEFANIE H I, VETTE V W, ARJAN D W, et al. Learning from organizational incidents: resilience engineering for high-risk process environments[J]. Process Safety Progress, 2009, 28(1):90-95.
[4] HOLLNAGEL E. From safety-i to safety-II:a white paper,2013[EB/OL].[2015-05-28].https://www.eurocontrol.int/sites/default/files/content/documents/nm/safety/safety_whitepaper_sept_2013-web.pdf.
[5] PASMAN H. Socio-technical systems, system safety, resilience engineering, and deeper accident analysis[M]. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2015: 231-240.
[6] PECIO M. The resilience engineering concept in enterprises with and without occupational safety and health management systems[J]. Safety Science, 2016, 82: 190-198.
[7] BERGSTRM J, WINSEN R V, HENRIQSON E. On the rationale of resilience in the domain of safety:a literature review[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2015, 141:131-141.
[8] LAY E, BRANLAT M, WOODS Z. A practitioner’s experiences operationalizing resilience engineering[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2015, 141:63-73.
[9] SHIRALI G A, MOHAMMADFAM I, EBRAHIMIPOUR V. A new method for quantitative assessment of resilience engineering by PCA and NT approach: a case study in a process industry[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2013, 119(119):88-94.
[10] 王俊伟,宋明莹,周耀明,等. 从安全工程角度谈弹复性工程的起源与发展[J]. 控制工程,2015,22(4):598-607.
WANG Junwei, SONG Mingying, ZHOU Yaoming, et al. Origin and development of resilience engineering: a perspective on safety engineering[J]. Control Engineering of China, 2015,22(4): 598-607.
[11] HOLLNAGEL E, WOODS D, LEVESON N. Resilience engineering: concepts and precepts[M]. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Company, 2006: 275-314.
[12] AZADEH A, SALEHI V, ASHJARI B, et al. Performance evaluation of integrated resilience engineering factors by data envelopment analysis:the case of a petrochemical plant[J]. Process Safety & Environmental Protection, 2014, 92(3): 231-241.
[13] SAURIN T A, JNIOR G C. Evaluation and improvement of a method for assessing HSMS from the resilience engineering perspective: a case study of an electricity distributor[J]. Safety Science, 2011, 49: 355-368.
[14] NEAL A, GRIFFIN M A. A study of the lagged relationships among safety climate, safety motivation, safety behavior, and accidents at the individual and group levels[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2006, 91(4): 946-53.
[15] BEEK D V D, SCHRAAGEN J M. ADAPTER:analysing & developing adaptability & performance in teams to enhance resilience[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2015, 141: 33-44.
[16] IACOBUCCI D. Structural equations modeling:fit indices, sample size, and advanced topics[J]. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2010, 20(1):90-98.
[17] MACKINNON D P, FRITZ M S, WILLIAMS J, et al. Distribution of the product confidence limits for the indirect effect: program PRODCLIN[J]. Behavior Research Methods, 2007, 39(3): 384-389.

基于弹性工程概念的作业人员安全绩效研究

Study on safety performance of first line operators in industrial enterprise based on resilience engineering concept

PDF

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	陈彦霖, 黄文炜, 李弘扬. 建筑企业差错管理氛围与工人安全绩效关系[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(5): 28-34.
[2]	戢晓峰, 耿昭师, 普永明, 卢梦媛, 覃文文. 接入道路对山区双车道公路穿村镇路段事故风险影响[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(5): 155-162.
[3]	李昊, 郝均卫工程师, 李文昌. PDCS安全管理模式研究与应用^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(2): 22-27.
[4]	李妙慧, 栗继祖. 群体动力对矿工不安全行为意向的影响研究^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(7): 48-55.
[5]	于光玉, 李慧民. 旧工业建筑改造施工安全影响机制研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(7): 120-129.
[6]	牛莉霞, 李肖萌. 5G时代智慧矿山安全管理新模式[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(6): 29-36.
[7]	宿国瑞, 贾宝山, 王鹏, 申琢. 基于多源异构数据的煤矿安全管理效果评估^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(6): 64-69.
[8]	曹璐璐, 刘艳. 有限空间作业人员不安全心理与行为关系研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(6): 70-75.
[9]	樊运晓, 牛毅, 杜晓涛. 基于国际专业资格认证的安全管理类课程设置^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(5): 25-30.
[10]	佟瑞鹏, 王露露, 李虹玮, 高宁, 安宇. 安全管理、风险管理与应急管理的关系探讨:基于大安全理念视角^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(5): 36-44.
[11]	宫运华. 安全管理方向本科及研究生培养模式研究^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(5): 126-131.
[12]	易涛, 栗继祖. 工作不安全感对矿工安全绩效的影响:基于代际差异视角[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(4): 49-56.
[13]	徐一菲, 金龙哲, 魏祎璇, 于露. 有限空间作业人员生理状态监测设备研制[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(3): 82-89.
[14]	林晓飞, 林必毅, 宋守信, 喻萧, 沈凡. 地铁乘客火灾应激反应过程模型构建与分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(3): 142-147.
[15]	杨鑫刚, 王起全. 建筑安全管理机制博弈分析与改进^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(11): 26-31.